Objective surgical performance evaluation based on haptic feedback

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 85, Issue , 2002, Pages 304-310

  Moody, Louise ^a   Baber, Chris ^a   Arvanitis, Theodoros N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK; PHANTOMS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DATA COLLECTION METHOD; FORCE APPLICATION; OPERATING THEATRE; PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS; PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK; SURGICAL SIMULATION SYSTEMS; TASK COMPLETION TIME; VIRTUAL REALITY TRAINING;

SURGERY;

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INJURY; SKIN; SUTURING METHOD;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SKIN; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 1542591114     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-929-5-304     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Hamdorf, J. M. and J. C. Hall (2000). Acquiring surgical skills. British Journal of Surgery 87: 28-37.
2. Kaufman, H. H., R. L. Wiegand, et al. (1987). Teaching surgeons to operate-principles of psychomotor skills training. Ada Neurochirurgica 87: 1-7.
3. O'Toole, R. V., R. R. Playter, et al. (1999). Measuring and developing suturing technique with a virtual reality surgical simulator. Journal of American College of Surgeons 189(1): 114-27.
4. Caraugh, J. H., M. Martin, et al. (1999). Modelling surgical expertise for motor skill acquisition. American Journal of Surgery 177: 331-6.
5. Gupta, V., N. P. Reddy, et al. (1997). Forces in laparoscopic surgical tools. Presence 6(2): 218-28.
6. Chen, E. and B. Marcus (1998). Force feedback for surgical simulation. Proceedings of the IEEE 86(3): 524-30.
7. Kopta, J. A. (1971). An approach to the evaluation of operative skills. Surgery 70(2): 297-303.
8. Macmillan, A. I. and A. Cuschieri (1999). Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: Predictive and concurrent validity. American Journal of Surgery 177: 274-7.
9. Platt, A. J., G. Holt, et al. (1997). A new method for the assessment of suturing ability. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh 42: 383-5.
10. Rosser, J. C., L. E. Rosser, et al. (1997). Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Archives of Surgery 132: 200-4.
11. Torkington, J., S. G. T. Smith, et al. (2000). The role of simulation in surgical training. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons England 82: 88-94.
12. Rosen, J., M. MacFarlane, et al. (1999). Surgeon-tool force/torque signatures - evaluation of surgical skills in minimally invasive surgery. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, San Francisco, CA, IOS Press.
13. SensAble Technologies www.sensable.com
14. Berkley, J. Weghorst, S. et al. (1999) Fast finite element based deformation and force-feedback: Suture demo/version 1.0 alpha, SensAble Technologies. www.hitl.washington.edu.people/jberkley.download.htm