Qualitative and quantitative peptidomic and proteomic approaches to phenotyping chicken semen

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 112, Issue , 2015, Pages 313-335

  Labas, Valérie ^a,b,c,d,e   Grasseau, Isabelle ^a,b,c,d   Cahier, Karine ^a,b,c,d   Gargaros, Audrey ^a,b,c,d   Harichaux, Grégoire ^a,b,c,d,e   Teixeira Gomes, Ana Paula ^c,e,f   Alves, Sabine ^a,b,c,d   Bourin, Marie ^a,b,c,d   Gérard, Nadine ^a,b,c,d   Blesbois, Elisabeth ^a,b,c,d  

^a UMR85 PHYSIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION ET DES COMPORTEMENTS   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^d IFCE   (France)

^e CEMAGREF   (France)

^f UR1282   (France)

Author keywords

Chicken (Gallus gallus); Fertility; ICM MS; Proteomic; Semen; Top down MS

Indexed keywords

ACROSIN; AVIAN BETA DEFENSIN 10; AVIAN BETA DEFENSIN 9; AVIDIN; BETA DEFENSIN; CD5 MOLECULE LIKE PROTEIN; CHEMERIN; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE SUBUNIT 7C; GAMMA GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE; GAMMA GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE 1; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER 3; OUTER MEMBRANE PROTEIN; OVALBUMIN; POLYUBIQUITIN; POLYUBIQUITIN B; PROPIONYL COENZYME A CARBOXYLASE; PROPIONYL COENZYME A CARBOXYLASE BETA POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEIN; PROTEOME; SERUM ALBUMIN; TUBULIN POLYMERIZATION PROMOTING PROTEIN FAMILY MEMBER 2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VITELLINE MEMBRANE OUTER LAYER PROTEIN 1; AVIAN PROTEIN; SEMINAL PLASMA PROTEIN;

ADULT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY METABOLISM; GALLUS GALLUS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MALE; MALE FERTILITY; MATRIX ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY; NANOFLOW LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PEPTIDOMICS; PHENOTYPE; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN POLYMORPHISM; PROTEOMICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; RESPIRATORY CHAIN; SEMINAL PLASMA; SPERM; SPERM QUALITY; SPERMATOZOON; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; ANIMAL; CHICKEN; METABOLISM;

GALLUS GALLUS;

ANIMALS; AVIAN PROTEINS; CHICKENS; MALE; PROTEOMICS; SEMEN; SEMINAL PLASMA PROTEINS;

EID: 84909952024     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Blesbois E. Biological features of the avian male gamete and their application to biotechnology of conservation. J Poult Sci 2012, 49:141-149.
2. Blesbois E., Brillard J.P. Specific features of in vivo and in vitro sperm storage in birds. Animal 2007, 1:1472-1481.
3. Stepinska U., Bakst M. Fertilization. Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Birds 2007, 10:553-587. B.G.M. Jamieson (Ed.).
4. Oliva R., de Mateo S., Estanyol J.M. Sperm cell proteomics. Proteomics 2009, 9:1004-1017.
5. Park Y.J., Kim J., You Y.A., Pang M.G. Proteomic revolution to improve tools for evaluating male fertility in animals. J Proteome Res 2013, 12:4738-4747.
6. Blesbois E., Grasseau I., Seigneurin F., Mignon-Grasteau S., Saint Jalme M., Mialon-Richard M.M. Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens. Theriogenology 2008, 69:252-261.
7. Dacheux J.L., Paquignon M. Relations between the fertilizing ability, motility and metabolism of epididymal spermatozoa. Reprod Nutr Dev 1980, 20:1085-1099.
8. Dacheux J.L., Druart X., Fouchecourt S., Syntin P., Gatti J.L., Okamura N., et al. Role of epididymal secretory proteins in sperm maturation with particular reference to the boar. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1998, 53:99-107.
9. Blesbois E., Caffin J.P. 'Serum like' albumin of fowl seminal plasma and effects of albumin on fowl spermatozoa stored at 4 degrees C. Br Poult Sci 1992, 33:663-670.
10. Blesbois E., Hermier D. Effects of high-density lipoproteins on storage at 4 degrees C of fowl spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1990, 90:473-482.
11. Blesbois E., de Reviers M. Effect of different fractions of seminal plasma on the fertilizing ability of fowl spermatozoa stored in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1992, 95:263-268.
12. Marzoni M., Castillo A., Sagona S., Citti L., Rocchiccioli S., Romboli I., et al. A proteomic approach to identify seminal plasma proteins in roosters (Gallus gallus domesticus). Anim Reprod Sci 2013, 140:216-223.
13. Froman D.P., Feltmann A.J., Pendarvis K., Cooksey A.M., Burgess S.C., Rhoads D.D. Physiology and endocrinology symposium: a proteome-based model for sperm mobility phenotype. J Anim Sci 2011, 89:1330-1337.
14. Druart X., Rickard J.P., Mactier S., Kohnke P.L., Kershaw-Young C.M., Bathgate R., et al. Proteomic characterization and cross species comparison of mammalian seminal plasma. J Proteomics 2013, 91C:13-22.
15. Martinez-Heredia J., Estanyol J.M., Ballesca J.L., Oliva R. Proteomic identification of human sperm proteins. Proteomics 2006, 6:4356-4369.
16. Oliva R., Martinez-Heredia J., Estanyol J.M. Proteomics in the study of the sperm cell composition, differentiation and function. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2008, 54:23-36.
17. Peddinti D., Nanduri B., Kaya A., Feugang J.M., Burgess S.C., Memili E. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of bovine spermatozoa of varying fertility rates and identification of biomarkers associated with fertility. BMC Syst Biol 2008, 2:19.
18. Duncan M.W., Thompson H.S. Proteomics of semen and its constituents. Proteomics Clin Appl 2007, 1:861-875.
19. Gatti J.L., Castella S., Dacheux F., Ecroyd H., Metayer S., Thimon V., et al. Post-testicular sperm environment and fertility. Anim Reprod Sci 2004, 82-83:321-339.
20. Govindaraju A., Dogan S., Rodriguez-Osorio N., Grant K., Kaya A., Memili E. Delivering value from sperm proteomics for fertility. Cell Tissue Res 2012, 349:783-793.
21. Bantscheff M., Schirle M., Sweetman G., Rick J., Kuster B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem 2007, 389:1017-1031.
22. Duncan M.W., Roder H., Hunsucker S.W. Quantitative matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2008, 7:355-370.
23. Piersma S.R., Warmoes M.O., de Wit M., de Reus I., Knol J.C., Jimenez C.R. Whole gel processing procedure for GeLC-MS/MS based proteomics. Proteome Sci 2013, 11:17.
24. Gilchrist A., Au C.E., Hiding J., Bell A.W., Fernandez-Rodriguez J., Lesimple S., et al. Quantitative proteomics analysis of the secretory pathway. Cell 2006, 127:1265-1281.
25. Liu H., Sadygov R.G., Yates J.R. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2004, 76:4193-4201.
26. Washburn M.P., Wolters D., Yates J.R. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19:242-247.
27. Chelius D., Bondarenko P.V. Quantitative profiling of proteins in complex mixtures using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2002, 1:317-323.
28. Higgs R.E., Knierman M.D., Gelfanova V., Butler J.P., Hale J.E. Comprehensive label-free method for the relative quantification of proteins from biological samples. J Proteome Res 2005, 4:1442-1450.
29. Wang G., Wu W.W., Zeng W., Chou C.L., Shen R.F. Label-free protein quantification using LC-coupled ion trap or FT mass spectrometry: reproducibility, linearity, and application with complex proteomes. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:1214-1223.
30. Wang W., Zhou H., Lin H., Roy S., Shaler T.A., Hill L.R., et al. Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards. Anal Chem 2003, 75:4818-4826.
31. Wiener M.C., Sachs J.R., Deyanova E.G., Yates N.A. Differential mass spectrometry: a label-free LC-MS method for finding significant differences in complex peptide and protein mixtures. Anal Chem 2004, 76:6085-6096.
32. Bondarenko P.V., Chelius D., Shaler T.A. Identification and relative quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2002, 74:4741-4749.
33. Old W.M., Meyer-Arendt K., Aveline-Wolf L., Pierce K.G., Mendoza A., Sevinsky J.R., et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:1487-1502.
34. Mignon-Grasteau S., Muley N., Bastianelli D., Gomez J., Peron A., Sellier N., et al. Heritability of digestibilities and divergent selection for digestion ability in growing chicks fed a wheat diet. Poult Sci 2004, 83:860-867.
35. Burrows W., Quinn J. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poult Sci 1937, 14:251-254.
36. Brillard J.P., McDaniel G.R. The reliability and efficiency of various methods for estimating spermatozoa concentration. Poult Sci 1985, 64:155-158.
37. Sexton T.J. A new poultry semen extender. 1. Effects of extension on the fertility of chicken semen. Poult Sci 1977, 56:1443-1446.
38. Seigneurin F., Blesbois E. Effects of freezing rate on viability and fertility of frozen-thawed fowl spermatozoa. Theriogenology 1995, 43:1351-1358.
39. Eisen M.B., Spellman P.T., Brown P.O., Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:14863-14868.
40. Vizcaino J.A., Cote R., Reisinger F., Barsnes H., Foster J.M., Rameseder J., et al. The proteomics identifications database: 2010 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D736-D742.
41. Vizcaino J.A., Cote R.G., Csordas A., Dianes J.A., Fabregat A., Foster J.M., et al. The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D1063-D1069.
42. Labas V., Grasseau I., Cahier K., Gargaros A., Harichaux G. Teixeira-Gomes AP, et al. Data for chicken semen proteome and label free quantitative analyses displaying sperm quality biomarkers. 2014, Data in Brief December. 10.1016/j.dib.2014.08.008.
43. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002, 74:5383-5392.
44. Nesvizhskii A.I., Keller A., Kolker E., Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2003, 75:4646-4658.
45. Dennis G., Sherman B.T., Hosack D.A., Yang J., Gao W., Lane H.C., et al. DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol 2003, 4:P3.
46. Huang da W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009, 4:44-57. [It was published online: 18 December 2008]. 10.1038/nprot.2008.211.
47. Zybailov B., Coleman M.K., Florens L., Washburn M.P. Correlation of relative abundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling. Anal Chem 2005, 77:6218-6224.
48. Emonet S., Shah H.N., Cherkaoui A., Schrenzel J. Application and use of various mass spectrometry methods in clinical microbiology. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010, 16:1604-1613.
49. Feng H.T., Sim L.C., Wan C., Wong N.S., Yang Y. Rapid characterization of protein productivity and production stability of CHO cells by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2011, 25:1407-1412.
50. Kannan L., Liyanage R., Lay J.O., Rath N.C. Evaluation of beta defensin 2 production by chicken heterophils using direct MALDI mass spectrometry. Mol Immunol 2009, 46:3151-3156.
51. Kannan L., Rath N.C., Liyanage R., Lay J.O. Identification and characterization of thymosin beta-4 in chicken macrophages using whole cell MALDI-TOF. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007, 1112:425-434.
52. Ouedraogo R., Daumas A., Ghigo E., Capo C., Mege J.L., Textoris J. Whole-cell MALDI-TOF MS: a new tool to assess the multifaceted activation of macrophages. J Proteomics 2012, 75:5523-5532.
53. Demirev P.A., Feldman A.B., Kowalski P., Lin J.S. Top-down proteomics for rapid identification of intact microorganisms. Anal Chem 2005, 77:7455-7461.
54. Demirev P.A., Ramirez J., Fenselau C. Tandem mass spectrometry of intact proteins for characterization of biomarkers from Bacillus cereus T spores. Anal Chem 2001, 73:5725-5731.
55. Wynne C., Fenselau C., Demirev P.A., Edwards N. Top-down identification of protein biomarkers in bacteria with unsequenced genomes. Anal Chem 2009, 81:9633-9642.
56. Demirev P.A., Fenselau C. Mass spectrometry for rapid characterization of microorganisms. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif) 2008, 1:71-93.
57. Demirev P.A., Fenselau C. Mass spectrometry in biodefense. J Mass Spectrom 2008, 43:1441-1457.
58. Brogden K.A., Ackermann M., McCray P.B., Tack B.F. Antimicrobial peptides in animals and their role in host defences. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003, 22:465-478.
59. Derache C., Labas V., Aucagne V., Meudal H., Landon C., Delmas A.F., et al. Primary structure and antibacterial activity of chicken bone marrow-derived beta-defensins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009, 53:4647-4655.
60. Herve-Grepinet V., Rehault-Godbert S., Labas V., Magallon T., Derache C., Lavergne M., et al. Purification and characterization of avian beta-defensin 11, an antimicrobial peptide of the hen egg. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010, 54:4401-4409.
61. Lynn D.J., Higgs R., Lloyd A.T., O'Farrelly C., Herve-Grepinet V., Nys Y., et al. Avian beta-defensin nomenclature: a community proposed update. Immunol Lett 2007, 110:86-89.
62. Dhople V., Krukemeyer A., Ramamoorthy A. The human beta-defensin-3, an antibacterial peptide with multiple biological functions. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006, 1758:1499-1512.
63. Kluver E., Adermann K., Schulz A. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of beta-defensins, multi-functional peptides of the immune system. J Pept Sci 2006, 12:243-257.
64. Hall S.H., Yenugu S., Radhakrishnan Y., Avellar M.C., Petrusz P., French F.S. Characterization and functions of beta defensins in the epididymis. Asian J Androl 2007, 9:453-462.
65. Rodriguez-Jimenez F.J., Krause A., Schulz S., Forssmann W.G., Conejo-Garcia J.R., Schreeb R., et al. Distribution of new human beta-defensin genes clustered on chromosome 20 in functionally different segments of epididymis. Genomics 2003, 81:175-183.
66. Back J.F., Bain J.M., Vadehra D.V., Burley R.W. Proteins of the outer layer of the vitelline membrane of hen's eggs. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982, 705:12-19.
67. Mann K., Mann M. In-depth analysis of the chicken egg white proteome using an LTQ Orbitrap Velos. Proteome Sci 2011, 9:7.
68. Shamsi F.A., Chen Z., Liang J., Li K., Al-Rajhi A.A., Chaudhry I.A., et al. Analysis and comparison of proteomic profiles of tear fluid from human, cow, sheep, and camel eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011, 52:9156-9165.
69. Shimizu T., Vassylyev D.G., Kido S., Doi Y., Morikawa K. Crystal structure of vitelline membrane outer layer protein I (VMO-I): a folding motif with homologous Greek key structures related by an internal three-fold symmetry. EMBO J 1994, 13:1003-1010.
70. Lessley B.A., Brown K.I. Purification and properties of a proteinase inhibitor from chicken seminal plasma. Biol Reprod 1978, 19:223-234.
71. Kubiak A., Jakimowicz P., Polanowski A. A Kazal-type serine proteinase inhibitor from chicken liver (clTI-1): purification, primary structure, and inhibitory properties. Int J Biol Macromol 2009, 45:194-199.
72. Dada R., Kumar M., Jesudasan R., Fernandez J.L., Gosalvez J., Agarwal A. Epigenetics and its role in male infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012, 29:213-223.
73. Siciliano L., Marciano V., Carpino A. Prostasome-like vesicles stimulate acrosome reaction of pig spermatozoa. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2008, 6:5.
74. Surai P.F., Blesbois E., Grasseau I., Chalah T., Brillard J.P., Wishart G.J., et al. Fatty acid composition, glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity and total antioxidant activity of avian semen. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 1998, 120:527-533.
75. Castleman V.H., Romio L., Chodhari R., Hirst R.A., de Castro S.C., Parker K.A., et al. Mutations in radial spoke head protein genes RSPH9 and RSPH4A cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with central-microtubular-pair abnormalities. Am J Hum Genet 2009, 84:197-209.
76. Curry A.M., Williams B.D., Rosenbaum J.L. Sequence analysis reveals homology between two proteins of the flagellar radial spoke. Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12:3967-3977.
77. Lupetti P., Mencarelli C., Rosetto M., Heuser J.E., Dallai R. Structural and molecular characterization of dynein in a gall-midge insect having motile sperm with only the outer arm. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1998, 39:303-317.
78. Zariwala M.A., Knowles M.R., Leigh M.W. Primary ciliary dyskinesia. SourceGeneReviews 1993-2014, University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle (WA). R.A. Pagon, M.P. Adam, T.D. Bird, C.R. Dolan, C.T. Fong, R.J.H. Smith, K. Stephens (Eds.).
79. Roy A., Lin Y.N., Agno J.E., DeMayo F.J., Matzuk M.M. Absence of tektin 4 causes asthenozoospermia and subfertility in male mice. FASEB J 2007, 21:1013-1025.
80. Shimasaki S., Yamamoto E., Murayama E., Kurio H., Kaneko T., Shibata Y., et al. Subcellular localization of Tektin2 in rat sperm flagellum. Zoolog Sci 2010, 27:755-761.
81. Cao W., Ijiri T.W., Huang A.P., Gerton G.L. Characterization of a novel tektin member, TEKT5, in mouse sperm. J Androl 2011, 32:55-69.
82. Gerton G. Function of the acrosome. Fertilization 2001, 265-302. Academic Press, New York. E.M. Hardey (Ed.).
83. Belleannee C., Belghazi M., Labas V., Teixeira-Gomes A.P., Gatti J.L., Dacheux J.L., et al. Purification and identification of sperm surface proteins and changes during epididymal maturation. Proteomics 2011, 11:1952-1964.
84. Thimon V., Metayer S., Belghazi M., Dacheux F., Dacheux J.L., Gatti J.L. Shedding of the germinal angiotensin I-converting enzyme (gACE) involves a serine protease and is activated by epididymal fluid. Biol Reprod 2005, 73:881-890.
85. Nakamura R., Nakamoto C., Obama H., Durward E., Nakamoto M. Structure-function analysis of Nel, a thrombospondin-1-like glycoprotein involved in neural development and functions. J Biol Chem 2012, 287:3282-3291.