Data for chicken semen proteome and label free quantitative analyses displaying sperm quality biomarkers

Data in Brief

Volumn 1, Issue , 2014, Pages 37-41

  Labas, Valérie ^a,b,c,d,e   Grasseau, Isabelle ^a,b,c,d   Cahier, Karine ^a,b,c,d   Gargaros, Audrey ^a,b,c,d   Harichaux, Grégoire ^a,b,c,d,e   Teixeira Gomes, Ana Paula ^c,e,f   Alves, Sabine ^a,b,c,d   Bourin, Marie ^a,b,c,d   Gérard, Nadine ^a,b,c,d   Blesbois, Elisabeth ^a,b,c,d  

^a UMR85 PHYSIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION ET DES COMPORTEMENTS   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^d IFCE   (France)

^e CEMAGREF   (France)

^f UR1282   (France)

Author keywords

Chicken (Gallus gallus); Fertility; Proteome; Seminal plasma; Spermatozoa

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; BODY FLUIDS; CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

AVIAN SPECIES; CHICKEN (GALLUS GALLUS); FERTILITY; GENETIC RESOURCES; LABEL FREE; MALE GAMETE; PERFORMANCE; SEMINAL PLASMA; SPERM QUALITY; SPERMATOZOON;

BIOMARKERS;

EID: 84923646095     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23523409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2014.08.008     Document Type: DP

References (10)

1. Labas V., Grasseau I., Cahier K., Gargaros A., Harichaux G., Teixeira-Gomes A.P., et al. Qualitative and quantitative peptidomic and proteomic approaches to phenotyping chicken semen. J Proteomics 2014, (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2014.07.024).
2. Mignon-Grasteau S., Muley N., Bastianelli D., Gomez J., Peron A., Sellier N., et al. Heritability of digestibilities and divergent selection for digestion ability in growing chicks fed a wheat diet. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83:860-867.
3. Brillard J.P., McDaniel G.R. The reliability and efficiency of various methods for estimating spermatozoa concentration. Poult. Sci. 1985, 64:155-158.
4. Sexton T.J. A new poultry semen extender. 1. Effects of extension on the fertility of chicken semen. Poult. Sci. 1977, 56:1443-1446.
5. Blesbois E., Grasseau I., Seigneurin F., Mignon-Grasteau S., Saint Jalme M., Mialon-Richard M.M. Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens. Theriogenology 2008, 69:252-261.
6. Seigneurin F., Blesbois E. Effects of freezing rate on viability and fertility of frozen-thawed fowl spermatozoa. Theriogenology 1995, 43:1351-1358.
7. Vizcaino J.A., Cote R., Reisinger F., Barsnes H., Foster J.M., Rameseder J., et al. The proteomics identifications database: 2010 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:D736-D742.
8. Vizcaino J.A., Cote R.G., Csordas A., Dianes J.A., Fabregat A., Foster J.M., et al. The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D1063-D1069.
9. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74:5383-5392.
10. Nesvizhskii A.I., Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4:1419-1440.