Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens

Theriogenology

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 252-261

  Blesbois, E ^a   Grasseau, I ^a   Seigneurin, F ^b   Mignon Grasteau, S ^c   Saint Jalme, M ^d   Mialon Richard, M M ^e  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b SYSAAF   (France)

^c STATION DE RECHERCHES AVICOLES   (France)

^d MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^e UMR1213 HERBIVORES   (France)

Author keywords

Chicken; Cryopreservation; Freezing; Semen quality; Spermatozoa

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHICKEN; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; MALE; MEMBRANE FLUIDITY; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OSMOLARITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; STANDARD;

ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; CHICKENS; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; MALE; MEMBRANE FLUIDITY; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

AVES; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 37449002076     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Tajima A. Production of germ-line chimeras and their application in domestic chicken. Avian Poult Biol Rev 13 (2002) 15-30
2. Van de Lavoir M.C., Diamond J.H., Leighton P.A., Mather-Love C., Heyers B.S., Bradshaws R., Kerchner A., Hooi L.T., Gessaro T.M., Swanberg S.E., Delany M.E., and Etches R.J. Germline transmission of genetically modified primordial germ cells. Nature 441 (2006) 766-769
3. Petite J.N. Avian germplasm preservation: embryonic stem cells or primordial germ cell?. Poult Sci 85 (2006) 237-242
4. Bellagamba F., Cerolini S., and Cavalchini L.G. Cryopreservation of poultry semen: a review. World's Poult Sci J 49 (1993) 157-166
5. Hammersted R.H. Cryopreservation of poultry semen-current status and economics. In: Bakst M.R., and Wishart G.J. (Eds). Proceedings of the first international symposium on the artificial insemination of poultry. Poultry Science Association, Savoy, Illinois, USA (1995) 229-250
6. Massip A., Leibo S., and Blesbois E. Cryobiology and the breeding of domestic animals. In: Benson E., Fuller B., and Lane N. (Eds). Life in the frozen state vol. 12 (2004), Taylor and Francis Group, London (GBR) 371-392
7. Blesbois E. Current status in avian semen cryopreservation. World's Poult Sci J 63 (2007) 213-222
8. Blesbois E., Seigneurin F., Grasseau I., Limouzin C., Besnard J., Gourichon D., Coquerelle G., Rault P., and Tixier-Boichard M. Semen cryopreservation for ex-situ management of genetic diversity in chickens; creation of the French Avian Cryobank. Poult Sci 8 (2007) 550-565
9. ESHRE Andrology Special Interest Group. Consensus workshop on advanced diagnostic andrology techniques. Hum Reprod 11 (1996) 1463-1479
10. Gadea J. Sperm factors related to in vitro and in vivo porcine fertility. Theriogenology 63 (2005) 431-444
11. Gillan L., Evans G., and Maxwell W.M. Flow cytometric evaluation of sperm parameters in relation to fertility potential. Theriogenology 63 (2005) 445-457
12. Hoflack G., Rijsselaere T., Maes D., Dewulf J., Opsomer G., de Kruif A., and Van Soom A. Validation and usefulness of the sperm quality analyser (SQA II-C) for bull semen analysis 2005. Reprod Domestic Anim 40 (2005) 237-244
13. Papadopoulos S., Hanrahan J.P., Donovan A., Duffy P., Boland M.P., and Lonergan P. In vitro fertilization as a predictor of fertility from cervical insemination of sheep. Theriogenology 63 (2005) 150-159
14. Vidament M. French field result on factors affecting fertility of frozen stallion semen. Anim Reprod Sci 89 (2005) 115-136
15. Hernandez M., Roca J., Ballester J., Vasquez J.M., Martinez E.A., Johannisson A., Saravia F., and Rodriguez-Martinez H. Differences in SCSA outcome among boars with different sperm freezability. Int J Androl 29 (2006) 583-591
16. Peterson K., Kappen M.A., Ursem P.J., Nothling J.O., Colenbrander B., and Gadella B.M. Microscopic and flow cytometric semen assessment of Dutch AI-bucks: effects of semen processing procedures and their correlation to fertility. Theriogenology 67 (2007) 1163-1171
17. Blanco J.M., Gee G., Wildt D.E., and Donogue A.M. Species variation in osmotic, cryoprotectant, and cooling rate tolerance in poultry, eagle, and falcon spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 63 (2000) 1164-1171
18. Blesbois E., Grasseau I., and Seigneurin F. Membrane fluidity and the ability to survive cryopreservation in domestic bird spermatozoa. Reproduction 129 (2005) 371-378
19. Long J.A. Avian semen cryopreservation: what are the biological challenges?. Poult Sci 85 (2006) 232-236
20. Beaumont C. Genetic parameters of the duration of fertility in hens. Can J Anim Sci 72 (1992) 193-201
21. Brillard J.P., Beaumont C., and Scheller M.F. Physiological responses of hens divergently selected on the number of chicks obtained from a single insemination. J Reprod Fertil 114 (1998) 111-117
22. Brillard P., and Mc Daniel J. The reliability and efficiency of various methods for estimating spermatozoa concentration. Poult Sci 64 (1985) 155-158
23. Sexton T.J. A new poultry semen extender. Effects of the diluent composition on the fertilizing capacity of the chicken semen stored at 5 °C. Poult Sci 57 (1977) 285-289
24. Seigneurin F., and Blesbois E. Effects of freezing rate on viability and fertility of frozen-thawed fowl spermatozoa. Theriogenology 43 (1995) 1351-1358
25. Blom E. Live-dead sperm stain by means of eosin-nigrosin smears. Fertil Steril 1 (1950) 176-177
26. Laird A.K., Tyler S.A., and Barton A.D. Dynamics of normal growth. Growth 29 (1965) 233-248
27. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8 (1999), SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
28. Wishart G.J. Quantitation of the fertilising ability of fresh compared with frozen and thawed fowl spermatozoa. Br Poult Sci 26 (1985) 375-380
29. Holt W.V. Basic aspects of frozen storage in semen. Anim Reprod Sci 62 (2000) 3-22
30. Ansah G., and Buckland R. Genetic variation in fowl semen cholesterol and phospholipid levels and the relationship of these lipids with fertility of frozen-thawed and fresh semen. Poult Sci 92 (1982) 604-615
31. Lake P.E. The male in reproduction. In: Bell D.J., and Freeman B.M. (Eds). Physiology and biochemistry of the domestic fowl vol. 3 (1971), Academic Press, London 1411-1447
32. Lake PE, Stewart JM. Artificial insemination in poultry. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Bulletin. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London 1978;213.
33. Lake P.E. The male in reproduction. In: Freeman B.M. (Ed). Physiology and biochemistry of the domestic fowl vol. 5 (1984), Academic Press, London 381-405
34. Shinitzky M., and Yuli I. Lipid fluidity at the submacroscopical level: determination by fluorescence polarization. Biochim Biophys Acta 515 (1982) 367-394
35. Giraud N.M., Motta C., Boucher D., and Grizard G. Membrane fluidity predicts the outcome of cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 15 (2000) 2160-2164
36. Mc Daniel C.D., Hannah J.L., Parker H.M., Smith T.W., Schultz C.D., and Zumwalt C.D. Use of sperm analyzer for evaluating broiler breeder males. 1. Effects of altering sperm quality and quantity on sperm motility index. Poult Sci 77 (1998) 888-893
37. Froman D.P., and Mc Lean D.J. Objective measurement of sperm motility based upon sperm penetration of Accudenz. Poult Sci 75 (1996) 776-784
38. Froman D.P., and Feltmann A.J. Sperm mobility: a quantitative trait of the domestic fowl. Biol Reprod 58 (1998) 379-384
39. Froman D.P., Feltmann A.J., Rhoads M.L., and Kirby J.D. Sperm mobility: a primary determinant of fertility in the fowl. Biol Reprod 61 (1999) 400-405
40. Froman D.P., and Feltmann A.J. Sperm mobility: phenotype in roosters determined by concentration of motile sperm and straight line velocity. Biol Reprod 62 (2000) 303-309
41. Froman D.P., Bowling E.R., and Wilsont J.L. Sperm mobility phenotype not determined by sperm quality index. Poult Sci 82 (2003) 496-502
42. Froman D.P., Wardell J.C., and Feltmann A.J. Sperm mobility: deduction of a model explaining phenotypic variations in roosters. Biol Reprod 74 (2006) 487-491
43. Parker H.J., Yeatma J.B., Schultz C.D., Zumwalt C.D., and Mc Daniel C.D. Use of a semen analyser for evaluating broiler breeder males. 2. Selection of young broiler breeder roosters for the sperm quality index increases fertile egg production. Poult Sci 79 (2000) 771-777
44. Parker H.M., Karaca A.J., Yeatman J.B., Frank L.R., and Mc Daniel C.D. Fertility of broiler breeders following categorization by the OptiBreed sperm quality index when hens are inseminated with a constant number of sperm. Poult Sci 81 (2002) 239-245
45. Parker H.M., and Mc Daniel C.C. Semen dilution prior to analysis influences the ability of the sperm quality analyzer to predict fertility whether inseminating with a constant number of sperm or a constant volume of semen. Poult Sci 82 (2003) 1808-1815
46. Mortimer D. CASA and evaluation of sperm motility. Proceedings of the ESHRE Camus '97. Computer assisted sperm analysis. San Miniato (Pisa) Italy, 3-6 April 1997 (1997)
47. Bakst M.R., and Cecil H.S. Effect of bovine serum albumin on motility and fecundity of turkey spermatozoa before and after storage. J Reprod Fertil 94 (1992) 287-293