Improving research through user engagement

Improving Research through User Engagement

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-149

  Rickinson, Mark ^a   Sebba, Judy ^b   Edwards, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909436834     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203831304     Document Type: Book

References (171)

1. Abelson, D. (2007) ‘Any ideas? Think tanks and policy analysis in Canada’, in L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett and D. Laycock (eds) Policy Analysis in Canada: the state of the art, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
2. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., Dyson, A., Farrell, P., Frankham, J., Gallannaugh, F., Howes, A. and Smith, R. (2006) Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion, Abingdon: Routledge.
3. Amara, N., Ouimet, M. and Landry, R. (2004) ‘New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies’, Science Communication, 26(1): 75–106.
4. Anxiety Zone (2009) ‘Dyslexia’, AnxietyZone. Online. Available: http://www.anxietyzone.com/conditions/dyslexia.html (accessed 5 June 2010).
5. Ball, S. and Exley, S. (2010) ‘Making policy with “good ideas”: policy networks and the “intellectuals” of New Labour’, Journal of Education Policy, 25(2): 151–169.
6. Barab, S. and Squire, K. (2004) ‘Design- based research: putting a stake in the ground’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1): 1–14.
7. Barnes, M. (2006) ‘Researching with service users: a perspective from health and social policy’, paper presented at Seminar 4 of the User Engagement Thematic Seminar Series, Maison Française d’Oxford, 8 March 2006.
8. Barnes, M. (2008) ‘Is the personal no longer political? A response to Charles Leadbeater, Jamie Bartlett and Niamh Gallagher’s “Making it Personal” (Demos, 2008)’, Soundings, 39: 152–159.
9. Barnes, M. and Taylor, S. (2007) Involving Older People in Research: examples, purposes and good practice. Online. Available: http://www.era- age.group.shef.ac.uk/download.php?id=406 (accessed 23 March 2010).
10. Barnett- Page, E. and Thomas, J. (2009) ‘Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review’, BMC Medical Research Methodology 9: 59.
11. Bartlett, J. (2009) ‘At your service: navigating the future market in health and social care’. Online. Available: http://www.demos.co.uk/files/ At_your_service:-_web.pdf?1256725103 (accessed 12 February 2010).
12. Bell, D. (1979) Social Science since the Second World War, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
13. Braye, S. and Preston- Shoot, M. (2005) ‘Emerging from out of the shadows? Service user and carer involvement in systematic reviews’, Evidence & Policy, 1(2): 173–193.
14. British Academy (2008) Punching our Weight: the humanities and social sciences in public policy making. Online. Available: http://www.sis.ac.uk/ Wilson_Report.pdf (accessed 1 October 2009).
15. British Educational Research Association (BERA) (2008) The 2008 BERA Charter for Research Staff. Online. Available: http://www.bera.ac.uk/ files/guidelines/bera- charter.pdf (accessed 12 November 2009).
16. Brown, A. (1992) ‘Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2): 141–178.
17. Brown, C. (2009) ‘Effective research communication and its role in the development of evidence based policy- making. A case study of the Training and Development Agency for Schools’, MA dissertation, Institute of Education, University of London.
18. Cabinet Office Strategy Unit (2009) Power in People’s Hands: learning from the world’s best public services. Online. Available: http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/224869/world- class.pdf (accessed 3 February 2010).
19. Campbell, R. J., Robinson, W., Neelands, J., Hewston, R. and Mazzoli, L. (2007) ‘Personalised learning: ambiguities in theory and practice’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2): 135–54.
20. Campbell, S., Benita, S., Coates, E., Davies, P. and Penn, G. (2007) Analysis for Policy: evidence- based policy in practice. Online. Available: http://www.gsr.gov.uk/downloads/resources/pu256_160407.pdf (accessed 12 May 2010).
21. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF) (n.d.) ‘Policy on open access to research outputs’. Online. Available: http://www.chsrf.ca/AboutUs/funding_granting/policy.aspx (accessed 7 January 2011).
22. Carlile, P. (2004) ‘Transferring, translating and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries’, Organization Science, 15(5): 555–1568.
23. Chaiklin, S. (1993) ‘Understanding the social scientific practice of Understanding practice’, in S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (eds) Understanding Practice: perspectives on activity and context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Chapman, J. (2002) System Failure: why governments must learn to think differently, London: Demos.
25. Children’s Workforce Development Council (CWDC) (2004) National Occupational Standards in Children’s Care, Learning and Development. Online. Available: http://www.cwdcouncil.org.uk/nos/ccld-level-3 (accessed 1 June 2010).
26. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R. and Schauble, L. (2003) ‘Design experiments in educational research’, Educational Researcher, 32(1): 9–13.
27. Collins, A. (1992) ‘Towards a design science of education’, in E. Scanlon and T. O’Shea (eds) New Directions in Educational Technology, Berlin: Springer- Verlag.
28. Collins, A., Joseph, D. and Bielaczyc, K. (2004) ‘Design research: theoretical and methodological issues’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1): 15–42.
29. Commission on the Social Sciences (2003) Great Expectations: the social sciences in Britain. Online. Available: http://www.acss.org.uk/docs/ GtExpectations.pdf (accessed 2 December 2010).
30. Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers (2008) Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers. Online. Available: http://www.researchconcordat.ac.uk/documents/concordat.pdf (accessed 1 December 2009).
31. Connell, J. and Kubisch, A. (1998) Applying a Theory of Change Approach to the Evaluation of Comprehensive Community Initiatives: progress, prospects, and problems, Aspen CO: Aspen Institute.
32. Cooper, A. and Levin, B. (2010) ‘Some Canadian contributions to understanding knowledge mobilisation’, Evidence and Policy (in press).
33. Cooper, A., Levin, B. and Campbell, C. (2009) ‘The growing (but still limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice’, Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3): 159–171.
34. Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M. and Smith, P. C. (1999) ‘What works? The role of evidence in public sector policy and practice’, Public Money and Management, 19: 3–5.
35. Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. and Walter, I. (2008) ‘Why “knowledge transfer” is misconceived for applied social research’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 13(3): 188–190.
36. Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) (2008) Analysis and Evidence Strategy. Online. Available: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/general/Analysis%20and%20Evidence%20Strategy%20 (AES- 2008).pdf (accessed 5 March 2010).
37. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA) (2000) The Impact of Educational Research. Online. Available: http://www.detya.gov.au/highered/respubs/impact/overview.htm (accessed 3 June 2010).
38. Dowse, L. (2009) ‘“It’s like being in a zoo”: researching with people with intellectual disability’, Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 9(3): 141–153.
39. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2009a) Taking Stock: a summary of ESRC’s work to evaluate the impact of research on policy and practice. Online. Available: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/ Images/taking_stock_tcm6–30940.pdf (accessed 10 November 2009).
40. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2009b) ESRC Research Funding Guide Post fEC. Online. Available: http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/ESRC_ Research_Funding_Guide_tcm6–9734.pdf (accessed 24 October 2009).
41. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2009c) ESRC Postgraduate Training and Development Guidelines 2009. Online. Available: http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/ Images/Postgraduate%20Training%20and%20Development%20 Guidelines_tcm6–33067.pdf (accessed 25 November 2009).
42. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2010a) ‘How to write a good application’, ESRC Society Today. Online. Available: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Support/research_ award_holders/FAQs2/index1.aspx (accessed 8 November 2010).
43. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2010b) ‘Knowledge exchange opportunites’. Online. Available: http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/KnowledgeExch/index.aspx (accessed 15 December 2010).
44. Edwards, A. (2001) ‘Researching pedagogy: a sociocultural agenda’, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 9(2): 161–186.
45. Edwards, A. (2002) ‘Responsible research: ways of being a researcher’, British Educational Research Journal, 28(2): 157–168.
46. Edwards, A. (2010) Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: the relational turn in expertise, Dordrecht: Springer.
47. Edwards, A., Sebba, J. and Rickinson, M. (2006b) ‘Working with users in educational research: some implications for research capacity building’, Building Research Capacity, (11): 1–4.
48. Edwards, A., Sebba, J. and Rickinson, M. (2007) ‘Working with users: the implications for educational research’, British Educational Research Journal, 33(5): 647–661.
49. Edwards, A., Sebba, J. and Rickinson, M. (2009b) Making a Difference: collaborating with users to develop educational research; TLRP Research Briefing No 76. Online. Available: http://www.tlrp.org/pub/documents/EdwardsA%20RB76%20Final.pdf (accessed 12 February 2010).
50. Edwards, A., Lunt, I. and Stamou, E. (2010) ‘Inter- professional work and expertise: new roles at the boundaries of schools’, British Educational Research Journal, 36(1): 27–45.
51. Edwards, A., Barnes, M., Plewis, I. and Morris, K. (2006a) Working to prevent the Social Exclusion of Children and Young People: Final Lessons from the National Evaluation of the Children’s Fund. DfES Research Report 734, London: DfES.
52. Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J. and Warmington, P. (2009a) Improving Inter- professional Collaborations: multi- agency working for children’s wellbeing, London: Routledge.
53. Ellis, V. (2010) ‘Studying the process of change: the double stimulation strategy in teacher education research’, in V. Ellis, A. Edwards and P. Smagorinsky (eds) Cultural- historical Perspectives on Teacher Education and Development, London: Routledge.
54. Engeström, Y. (1999) ‘Activity theory and individual and social transformation’, in Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen and R.-L. Punamäki (eds) Perspectives on Activity Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Engeström, Y. (2007) ‘Putting activity theory to work: the change laboratory as an application of double stimulation’, in H. Daniels, M. Cole and J. V. Wertsch (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Wertsch (eds) (2008) From Teams to Knots: activity theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Evetts, J. (2009) ‘New professionalism and new public management: changes continuities and consequences’, Comparative Sociology, 8: 247–66.
58. Facts in Education (2010) ‘The facts on school choice and decentralization’, Facts in Education, 7 April. Online. Available at http://factsineducation.blogspot.com/2010/04/facts-on-school-choice-and.html (accessed 2 December 2010).
59. Fielding, M. (2001) ‘Students as radical agents of change’, Journal of Educational Change, 2: 123–41.
60. Fielding, M. and Bragg, S. (2003) Students as Researchers: making a difference, Cambridge: Pearson.
61. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Foster, M., Harris, J., Jackson, K., Morgan, H. and Glendinning, C. (2006) ‘Personalised social care for adults with disabilities: a problematic concept for frontline practice’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 14(2): 125–35.
63. Foster, P. and Hammersley, M. (1998) ‘A review of reviews: structure and function in reviews of educational research’, British Educational Research Journal, 24(5): 609–28.
64. Furlong, J. and Oancea, A. (2005) Assessing Quality in Applied and Practicebased Educational Research: a framework for discussion, Oxford: Oxford University Department of Educational Studies.
65. Furlong, J. and Salisbury, J. (2005) ‘Best practice research scholarships: an evaluation’, Research Papers in Education, 20(1): 45–83.
66. Garcia, J., Sinclair, J., Dickson, K., Thomas, J., Brunton, J., Tidd, M. and the PSHE Review Group (2006) Conflict Resolution, Peer Mediation and Young People’s Relationships: review conducted by the Personal, Social and Health Education (PSHE) school-based Review Group. Technical report. Online. Available: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=NZ7TOKwLxp4%3d&tabid=708&mid=1621&language=en- US (accessed 3 June 2010).
67. Gardiner, P. (1988) Kierkegaard, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Gibbons, M. (1999) ‘Science’s new social contract’, Nature 402(6761 Suppl): C81–C84.
69. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge, London: Sage.
70. Goldacre, B. (2009) ‘Influence from the sun and moon’, Bad Science Series, Guardian, 31 October.
71. Gough, P. R., Lajoie, J., Shlonsky, A. and Trocmé, N. (2009) ‘Journal Watch: an inter- university collaborative learning partnership’, Social Work Education, 29(1): 18–26.
72. Haas, E. (2007) ‘False equivalency: think tank references on education in the news media’, Peabody Journal of Education, 82(1): 63–102.
73. Hargreaves, D. (1998) ‘A new partnership of stakeholders and a national strategy for research in education’, in J. Rudduck and D. McIntyre (eds) Challenges for Educational Research, London: Paul Chapman.
74. Harlen, W. (1977) ‘A stronger teacher role in curriculum development?’, Curriculum Studies 9(1): 21–9.
75. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2009) Research Excellence Framework: impact pilot exercise. Online. Available: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/impact (accessed 10 February 2010).
76. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2010) Annex A: initial decisions on the Research Excellence Framework. Online. Available: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/circlets/2010/ cl04_10/cl04_10a.pdf (accessed 5 June 2010).
77. Hillage, J., Pearson, R., Anderson, A. and Tamkin, P. (1998) Excellence in Research on Schools, DfEE Research Report 74, London: DfEE.
78. HM Government (2009) Building Britain’s Future, CM7654. Norwich: The Stationery Office.
79. Hodkinson, P. and Smith, J. K. (2004) ‘The relationship between research, policy and practice’, in G. Thomas, and R. Pring (eds) Evidence- based Practice in Education, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
80. Huberman, M. (1987) ‘Steps towards an integrated model of research utilization’, Knowledge, 8: 586–611.
81. Huberman, M. (1990) ‘Linkage between researchers and practitioners: a qualitative study’, American Educational Research Journal, 27: 363–91.
82. Huberman, M. (1993) ‘Linking the practitioner and research communities for school improvement’, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(1): 1–16.
83. Innvaer, S., Vist, G., Trommald, M. and Oxman, A. (2002) ‘Health policymakers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7(4): 239–44.
84. Jacklin, A., Robinson, C., O’Meara, L. and Harris, A. (2007) Improving the Experiences of Disabled Students in Higher Education, York: Higher Education Academy.
85. Kahn, P., Wareham, T. and Young, R. (2006) ‘Evaluation of a collaborative practitioner review methodology developed for a review of the effectiveness of reflective practices in programmes for new academic staff in universities’, paper presented at British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Warwick, September 2006.
86. Kennedy, M. (1997) ‘The connection between research and practice’, Educational Researcher, 26(7): 9–17.
87. Kirst, M. W. (2000) ‘Bridging education research and education policymaking’, Oxford Review of Education, 26(4): 379–91.
88. Knight, L. and Pettigrew, A. (2007) ‘Explaining process and performance in the co- production of knowledge: a comparative analysis of collaborative research projects’, paper presented at the Organization Studies Third Summer Workshop, Crete, Greece, June 2007.
89. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: how sciences make knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90. Knott, J. H. and Weissert, C. S. (1996) Linking Ideas to Policy: what can be learned from foundations’ efforts to inform health policymakers, East Lansing, MI: Institute for Public Policy and Social Research.
91. Landry, R., Amara, N. and Lamari, M. (2001) ‘Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada’, Research Policy, 30: 333–49.
92. Landry, R., Amara, N. and Lamari, M. (2003) ‘The extent and determinants of utilization of university research in government agencies’, Public Administration Review, 63(2): 192–205.
93. Lavis, J. N., McLeod, C. B. and Gildiner, A. (2003) ‘Measuring the impact of health research’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 8: 165–70.
94. Leadbeater, C. (2004) Learning about Personalisation: how can we put the learner at the heart of the education system?, London: Demos.
95. Lencucha, R., Kothari, A. and Hamel, N. (2010) ‘Extending collaborations for knowledge translation: lessons from the community based participatory research literature’, Evidence & Policy, 6(1): 61–75.
96. Levin, B. (2004a) ‘Media- government relations in education’, Journal of Education Policy, 19(3): 271–83.
97. Levin, B. (2004b) ‘Making research in education to matter more’, Education and Policy Archives, 12(56): 1–22.
98. Levin, B. (2008) ‘Thinking about knowledge mobilisation’, paper prepared for an invitational symposium sponsored by the Canadian Council on Learning and the Social Sciences and the Humanities Research Council of Canada, May 2008.
99. Lomas, J. (1993) ‘Diffusion, dissemination and implementation: who should do what?’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703: 226–35.
100. Lomas, J., Culyer, T., McCutcheon, C., McAuley, L. and Law, S. (2005) Conceptualizing and Combining Evidence for Health System Guidance. Online. Available: http://www.chsrf.ca/other_documents/pdf/ evidence:e.pdf (accessed 3 March 2010).
101. Lundvall, B.- Å. (1996) ‘The social dimension of the learning economy’, DRUID Working Paper No. 96–1.
102. Lundvall, B.- Å. (2000) ‘The learning economy: some implications for the knowledge base of health and education systems’, in OECD/CERI (eds) Knowledge Management in the Learning Society, Paris: OECD/CERI.
103. McIntyre, D. (1998) ‘The usefulness of educational research: an agenda for consideration and action’, in J. Rudduck and D. McIntyre (eds) Challenges for Educational Research, London: Paul Chapman.
104. McLaughlin, C. and Black- Hawkins, K., Townsend., A. (2005) Practitioner Research and Enquiry within Networked Learning Communities, Nottingham: NCSL.
105. McNutt, K. and Marchildon, G. (2009) ‘Think tanks and the web: measuring visibility and influence’, Canadian Public Policy, 35(2): 219–36.
106. Martinez, N. R. and Campbell, D. (2007) ‘Using knowledge brokering to promote evidence- based policy- making’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(5): 325–420.
107. Miliband, D. (2004) Personalised Learning: building a new relationship with schools, speech to North of England Education Conference, Belfast 8 January. Online. Available http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/ eOrderingDownload/personalised- learning.pdf (accessed 4 May 2010).
108. Millar, R. (2002) ‘Towards evidence- based practice in science education’, School Science Review, 84 (307): 19–20.
109. Mitchell, F., Lunt, N. and Shaw, I. (2010) ‘Practitioner research in social work: a knowledge review’, Evidence & Policy, 6: 7–31.
110. Mollas- Gallart, J., Tang, P. and Morros, S. (2000) ‘Assessing the nonacademic impact of grant- funded socio- economic research: results from a pilot study’, Research Evaluation, 9(3): 171–82.
111. Morris, A., Percy- Smith, J. and Rickinson, M. (2007) Practitioners and Evidence: designing research and development to influence practice, Reading: CfBT.
112. Mulgan, G. (2005) ‘Government, knowledge and the business of policy making: the potential and limits of evidence- based policy’, Evidence & Policy, 1(2): 215–26.
113. Munn, P., Ozga, J., Raffe, D., Simpson, M., Allan, J., Boreham, N., Johnstone, R., Morris, B., Bryce, T., Christie, D., Humes, W. and Livingston, K. (2003) A Collaborative Proposal for a National Programme of Infrastructure Development and Research. Online. Available: http://www.aers.org.uk/aers/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&i d=12&Itemid=26 (accessed 15 November 2009).
114. Nissen, M. (2009) ‘Objectification and prototype’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6(1): 67–87.
115. Nonaki, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
116. Nowotny, H. (2000) ‘Transgressive competence: the narrative of expertise’, European Journal of Social Theory, 3(1): 5–21.
117. Nowotny, H. (2003) ‘Dilemma of expertise’, Science and Public Policy, 30(3): 151–6.
118. Nuffield Foundation (2010) 2010 Guide to Grants for Research and Innovation. Online. Available: http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Grants%20for%20research%20and%20innovation%20%20-%20complete%20guide%202010v13_09_10(3).pdf (accessed 12 March 2010).
119. Nutley, S. M. (2005) ‘Models of the research- policy relationship’, paper presented at Seminar 2 of the User Engagement Thematic Seminar Series, Institute of Education, University of London, London, 24 May 2005.
120. Nutley, S. M., Walter, I. and Davies, H. (2007) Using Evidence: how research can inform public services, Bristol: The Policy Press.
121. Oakley, A. (2000) Experiments in Knowing: gender and method in the social sciences, Cambridge: Polity Press.
122. Oancea, A. (2005) ‘Criticisms of educational research’, British Educational Research Journal, 31(2): 157–83.
123. Ontario Ministry of Education (2010) Research and Evaluation Strategy, Ontario: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Online. Available: www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/research/research.pdf (accessed 15 December 2010).
124. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Centre of Educational Research and Innovation (CERI) (2002) Educational Research and Development in England: Examiners’ Report, Paris: OECD/ CERI.
125. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Centre of Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). (2007) Evidence in Education: linking research and policy, Paris: OECD/ CERI.
126. Pawson, R. (2003) Assessing the Quality of Evidence in Evidence- based Policy: why, how and when? Online. Available: http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/ publications/Pawson.pdf (accessed 3 June 2010).
127. Phipps, D. J. and Shapson, S. (2009) ‘Knowledge mobilisation builds local research collaborations for social innovation’, Evidence & Policy, 5(3): 211–27.
128. Pollard, A. (2004) ‘The SERA lecture 2003: what is and what might be? TLRP strategies and the development of educational research’, Scottish Educational Review, 36(1): 11–21.
129. Prost, A. (2001) Pour un programme stratégique de recherche en education. Report to the ministers d’Education nationale et de la Recherche, Paris: Ministere de l’Education nationale.
130. Punch, S. (2002) ‘Research with children: the same or different from research with adults’, Childhood, 9(3): 321–41.
131. Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) (2008) Sub- panel 45 Education Subject Overview Report. Online. Available: http://www.sfre.ac.uk/wp- content/ uploads/2009/01/uoa45- education.pdf (accessed 6 October 2009).
132. ResearchImpact (2008) ‘ResearchImpact hosts Canada’s first virtual Aboriginal Policy Research Forum’, ResearchImpact. Online. Available: www.researchimpact.ca/kmbinaction/aboriginal/index.html (accessed 1 December 2010).
133. Rich, A. (2004) Think Tanks, Public Policy and the Politics of Expertise, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134. Rickinson, M., Walker, M. and Rudd, P. (2005) Mid- term Review of the ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme. Online. Available: http://www.tlrp.org/manage/documents/NFER_Final_TLRP_Report_ March_2005.pdf (10 October 2009).
135. Rigby, E. (2005) ‘Linking research and policy on Capitol Hill’, Evidence and Policy, 1: 195–213.
136. Royal College of General Practitioners (2006) Curriculum Statement 3.6. Online. Available: http://www.gmc- uk.org/3_6_Research_01.pdf_30450718.pdf (accessed 31 May 2010).
137. Rudduck, J. and McIntyre, D. (eds) (1998) Challenges for Educational Research, London: Paul Chapman.
138. Rudduck, J., Brown, N. and Hendy, L. (2005) ‘Personalised learning: the East Sussex project’, paper presented at the DfES Conference, November 2005.
139. Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J. and Tiberghien, A. (2009) ‘Design tools in didactical research: instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences’, Educational Researcher, 38(5): 329–42.
140. Saunders, L. (ed.) (2007a) Educational Research and Policy- making, London: Routledge.
141. Saunders, L. (2007b) ‘Editor’s introduction’, in L. Saunders (ed.) Educational Research and Policy- making, London: Routledge.
142. Sebba, J. (2007) ‘Enhancing impact on policy- making through increasing user engagement in research’, in L. Saunders (ed.) Educational Research and Policy- making, London: Routledge.
143. Sebba, J. and Robinson, C. (2010) Evaluation of UNICEF UK’s Rights Respecting Schools Award (RRSA), London: UNICEF.
144. Seely Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (2002) The Social Life of Information, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
145. Shakespeare, T. (1993) ‘Disabled people’s self- organisation: a new social movement?’, Disability, Handicap and Society, 8(3): 249–64.
146. Shakespeare, T. (2006) Disability Rights and Wrongs, London: Routledge.
147. Sharland, E. and Taylor, I. (2006) ‘Social care research: a suitable case for systematic review?’, Evidence & Policy, 2: 503–23.
148. Shavelson, R. J. and Towne, L. (2002) Scientific Research in Education, Washington DC: National Academy Press.
149. Slavin, R. (2002) ‘Evidence- based education policies: transforming educational practice and research’, Educational Researcher, 31(7): 15–21.
150. Somekh, B. (2007) ‘The interplay between policy and research in relation to ICT in education in the UK: issues from twenty years of programme evaluation’, in L. Saunders (ed.) Educational Research and Policy- making, London: Routledge.
151. Stehr, N. (1994) Knowledge Societies, London: Sage.
152. Sullivan, H., Barnes, M. and Matka, E. (2002) ‘Building collaborative capacity through “Theories of Change”: early lessons from the evaluation of Health Action Zones in England’, Evaluation, 8(2): 205–26.
153. Sutherland, R., John, P. and Robertson, S. (2007) Improving Learning with ICT, London: Routledge.
154. Sylva, K., Taggart, B., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P. and Siraj- Blatchford, I. (2007) ‘Changing models of research to inform educational policy’, Research Papers in Education, 22(2): 155–68.
155. Taylor, C., Connolly, M., Power, S. and Rees, G. (2007) Formative Evaluation of the Applied Educational Research Scheme (AERS). Online. Available: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/208243/0055238.pdf (accessed 12 May 2010).
156. Tetroe, J. M., Graham, I. D, Foy, R., Robinson, N., Eccles, M. P., Wensing, M., Durieux, P., Légaré, F., Palmhøj Nielson, C., Adily, A., Ward, J. E., Porter, C., Shea, B. and Grimshaw, J. M. (2008) ‘Health research funding agencies’ support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study’, Milbank Quarterly, 86(1): 125–55.
157. TLRP (2006) Using Computers to Enhance Learning: integrating ICT into everyday classroom practices, TLRP Research Briefing No. 19. Online. Available: http://www.tlrp.org/pub/documents/Sutherland_RB_19.pdf (accessed 31 May 2010).
158. TLRP (n.d.) ‘Towards evidence based practice in science education 2000–2003’. Online. Available: http://www.tlrp.org/proj/phase1/phase1bsept.html (accessed 15 December 2010).
159. Thomson, P. and Gunter, H. (2006) ‘From “consulting pupils” to “pupils as researchers”: a situated case narrative’, British Educational Research Journal, 32(6): 839–56.
160. Training and Development Agency for Schools (TDA) (2007) Professional Standards for Teachers. Online. Available: http://www.tda.gov.uk/upload/resources/pdf/s/standards_a4.pdf (accessed 29 June 10).
161. van den Acker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. and Nieveen, N. (2006) Educational Design Research, London: Routledge.
162. Walter, I., Nutley, S., Percy- Smith, J., McNeish, D. and Frost, S. (2004) Improving the Use of Social Care Research, SCIE Knowledge Review 7. Online. Available: http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/knowledge reviews/kr07.pdf (accessed 31 May 2010).
163. Ward, V., House, A. and Hamer, S. (2009) ‘Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain?’, Evidence & Policy, 5: 267–79.
164. Webb, S. (2002) ‘Evidence- based practice and decision analysis in social work: an implementation model’, Journal of Social Work, 2(1): 45–64.
165. Webb, S. (2008) ‘Modelling service user participation in social care’, Journal of Social Work, 8: 269–90.
166. Weiss, C. H. (1979) ‘The many meanings of research utilization’, Public Administration Review, 39(5): 426–31.
167. Weiss, C. H. (1980) ‘Knowledge creep and decision accretion’, Science Communication, 1: 381–404.
168. Whitty, G. (2002) Making Sense of Education Policy, London: Paul Chapman.
169. Willinsky, J. (2005) ‘Scientific research in a democratic culture: or what is social science for?’, Teachers College Record, 107(1): 38–51.
170. Winch, C. (2001) ‘Accountability and relevance in educational research’, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35: 443–59.
171. Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P. and Cicmil, S. (2006) ‘Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK governmentfunded research network’, International Journal of Project Management, 24: 638–49.