Personalised social care for adults with disabilities: A problematic concept for frontline practice

Health and Social Care in the Community

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 125-135

  Foster, Michele ^a   Harris, Jennifer ^b   Jackson, Karen ^e   Morgan, Hannah ^c   Glendinning, Caroline ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Choice; Community care; Disabled adults; Personalised social care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; DISABLED PERSON; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DISABLED PERSONS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS;

EID: 33645128008     PISSN: 09660410     EISSN: 13652524     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00602.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barnes M. (1998) Whose needs, whose resources? Accessing social care. In: M. Langan (Ed.) Welfare: Needs, Rights and Risks, pp. 81-126. Routledge, London.
2. Barnes M. (2005) The same old process? Older people, participation and deliberation. Ageing and Society 25 (2), 245-260.
3. Barnes M. & Prior D. (1995) Spoilt for choice? How consumerism can disempower public service users. Public Money & Management July-September, 53-58.
4. Beresford P. & Croft S. (2004) Service users and practitioners united: the key component for social work reform. British Journal of Social Work 34, 53-68.
5. Bewley C. & Glendinning C. (1994) Involving Disabled People in Community Care Planning. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.
6. Cabinet Office (2005) Improving the Life Chances of Disabled People, Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, London.
7. Chevannes M. (2002) Social construction of the managerialism of needs assessment by health and social care professionals. Health and Social Care in the Community 10 (3), 168-178.
8. Clapton J. & Kendall E. (2002) Autonomy and participation in rehabilitation: time for a new paradigm? Disability and Rehabilitation 24, 987-991.
9. Clarke J. (2004) Consumers, Clients or Citizens? Politics, policy and practice in the reform of Social Care. Paper prepared for Socialforskninginstituttet (SFI) symposium on Consumerism and Social Care, Copenhagen.
10. Davies A., Ellis K. & Rummery K. (1997) Access to Assessment; Perspectives of Practitioners, Disabled People and Carers. Policy Press, Bristol.
11. Department of Health (2005) Independence, Well-Being and Choice. Our Vision for the Future of Social Care for Adults in England. Department of Health, London.
12. Elsworth J., Marks J., McGrath J. & Wade D. (1999) An audit of goal planning in rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 6(2), 51-61.
13. Evans T. & Harris J. (2004) Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work 34, 871-895.
14. Foster M. & Tilse C. (2003) Referral to rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: a model for understanding inequities in access. Social Science and Medicine 56 (10), 2201-2210.
15. Glendinning C., Halliwell S., Jacobs S., Rummery K. & Tyrer J. (2000) New kinds of care, new kinds of relationships: how purchasing services affects relationships in giving and receiving personal assistance. Health and Social Care in the Community 8, 201-212.
16. Hall R. (1991) Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
17. Hardy B., Young R. & Wistow G. (1999) Dimensions of choice in the assessment and care management process: the views of older people, carers and care managers. Health and Social Care in the Community 7 (6), 483-491.
18. Harris J. & Morgan H. (2002) Outcomes for Disabled Service Users Interim Project Report, Social Policy Research Unit, The University of York/Department of Health.
19. Holland S. (2000) The assessment relationship: interactions between social workers and parents in child protection assessments. British Journal of Social Work 30, 149-163.
20. Jones A. & May J. (1992) Working in Human Service Organizations. Longman, Melbourne.
21. Kielhofner G. & Barrett L. (1998) Meaning and misunderstanding in occupational forms: a study of therapeutic goal setting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 52, 345-353.
22. Knight T. & Caveney S. (1998) Assessment and action records: will they promote good parenting? British Journal of Social Work 28, 29-43.
23. Kuipers P., Carlson G., Bailey S. & Sharma A. (2004) A preliminary exploration of goal setting in community based rehabilitation for people with brain impairment. Brain Impairment 5, 30-41.
24. Leadbeater C. (2004) Personalisation Through Participation: A New Script for Public Services. Demos, London.
25. Lent A. & Arend N. (2004) Making Choices. How Can Choice Improve Local Public Services? New Local Government Network, London.
26. Macpherson R., Jerrom B., Lott G. & Ryce M., (1999) The outcome of clinical goal setting in a mental health rehabilitation service. A model for evaluating clinical effectiveness. Journal of Mental Health 8 (1), 95-102.
27. Mason J. (1996) Qualitative Researching. Sage Publications, London.
28. Middleton L. (1997) The Art of Assessment. Venture Press, Birmingham.
29. Milner J. & O'Byrne P. (1998) Assessment in Social Work. Palgrave, Hampshire.
30. Morgan G. (1990) Introduction. In: G. Morgan (Ed.) Organizations in Society, pp. 1-16. Macmillan, London.
31. Nicholas E. (2003) An outcomes focus in carer assessment and review: value and challenge. British Journal of Social Work 1, 31-47.
32. Policy Commission on Public Services (2004) Making Public Services Personal: A new compact for public services. Policy Commission on Public Services Report to the National Consumer Council, London.
33. Qureshi H. (1999) Outcomes of social care for adults: attitudes towards collecting outcome information in practice. Health and Social Care in the Community 7 (4), 257-265.
34. Rummery K. (2002) Disability, Citizenship and Community Care: a Case for Welfare Rights? Ashgate, Aldershot.
35. Sheppard M., Newstead S., DiCaccavo A. & Ryan K. (2001) Comparative hypothesis assessment and quasi triangulation as process knowledge assessment strategies in social work practice. British Journal of Social Work 31, 863-885.
36. Simpson G., Foster M., Kuipers P., Kendall M. & Hanna J. (2005) An organizational perspective on goal setting in community-based brain injury rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 27 (15), 901-910.
37. Social Services Inspectorate (2002) Modern Social Services: A Commitment to Reform. Social Services Inspectorate, London.
38. Spander H. (2004) Friend or foe? Towards a critical assessment of direct payments. Critical Social Policy 24 (2), 187-209.
39. Thornton P. & Tozer R. (1995) Having a Say in Change: Older People and Community Care. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.