Unattentive speech processing is influenced by orthographic knowledge: Evidence from mismatch negativity

Brain and Language

Volumn 137, Issue , 2014, Pages 103-111

  Pattamadilok, Chotiga ^a   Morais, José ^b   Colin, Cécile ^b   Kolinsky, Régine ^b,c  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^c Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique FNRS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Orthographic knowledge; Reading acquisition; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; UNATTENTIVE SPEECH PROCESSING; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; RECOGNITION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84908563492     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Alexandrov A.A., Boricheva D.O., Pulvermüller F., Shtyrov Y. Strength of word-specific neural memory traces assessed electrophysiologically. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(8):e22999.
2. Blau V., van Atteveldt N., Ekkebus M., Goebel R., Blomert L. Reduced neural integration of letters and speech sounds links phonological and reading deficits in adult dyslexia. Current Biology 2009, 19(6):503-508.
3. Blomert L., Froyen D. Multi-sensory learning and learning to read. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2010, 77:195-204.
4. Bottcher-Gandor C., Ullsperger P. Mismatch negativity in event-related potentials to auditory stimuli as a function of varying interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology 1992, 29(5):546-550.
5. Colin C., Hoonhorst I., Markessis E., Radeau M., de Tourtchaninoff M., Foucher A. Mismatch Negativity (MMN) evoked by sound duration contrasts: An unexpected major effect of deviance direction on amplitudes. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009, 120(1):51-59.
6. Colin C., Radeau M., Soquet A., Demolin D., Colin F., Deltenre P. Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk-MacDonald effect: A phonetic representation within short-term memory. Clinical Neurophysiology 2002, 113(4):495-506.
7. Cutler A., Davis C. An orthographic effect in phoneme processing, and its limitations. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00018.
8. Cutler A., Treiman R., van Ooijen B. Strategic deployment of orthographic knowledge in phoneme detection. Language and Speech 2010, 53(3):307-320.
9. Damian M.F., Bowers J.S. Orthographic effects in rhyme monitoring tasks: Are they automatic?. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2009, 22(1):106-116.
10. Dehaene S., Pegado F., Braga L.W., Ventura P., Nunes Filho G., Jobert A. How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 2010, 330(6009):1359-1364.
11. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Cerebral specialization for speech and non-speech stimuli in infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(3):449-460.
12. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Baillet S. A phonological representation in the infant brain. NeuroReport 1998, 9(8):1885-1888.
13. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Pena M. Electrophysiological evidence for automatic phonetic processing in neonates. NeuroReport 2001, 12(14):3155-3158.
14. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Pena M., Christophe A., Landrieu P. Phoneme perception in a neonate with a left sylvian infarct. Brain and Language 2004, 88(1):26-38.
15. Duncan C.C., Barry R.J., Connolly J.F., Fischer C., Michie P.T., Näätänen R. Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009, 120(11):1883-1908.
16. Ehri L.C., Wilce L.S. The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology 1979, 71(1):26-40.
17. Fernandes T., Kolinsky R. From hand to eye: The role of literacy, familiarity, graspability, and vision-for-action on enantiomorphy. Acta Psychologica 2013, 142(1):51-61.
18. Fodor J.A. The modularity of mind 1983, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Froyen D., Bonte M.L., van Atteveldt N., Blomert L. The long road to automation: Neurocognitive development of letter-speech sound processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(3):567-580.
20. Froyen D., Van Atteveldt N., Bonte M., Blomert L. Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds. Neuroscience Letters 2008, 430(1):23-28.
21. Froyen D., Willems G., Blomert L. Evidence for a specific cross-modal association deficit in dyslexia: An electrophysiological study of letter-speech sound processing. Developmental Science 2011, 14(4):635-648.
22. Gernsbacher M.A. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1984, 113(2):256-281.
23. Gordon B. Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language 1985, 24(6):631-645.
24. Grainger J., Ferrand L. Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language 1996, 35(5):623-647.
25. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review 1999, 106:491-528.
26. Imai S., Walley A.C., Flege J.E. Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005, 117:896-907.
27. Kaukoranta E., Sams M., Hari R., Hämäläinen M., Näätänen R. Reactions of human auditory cortex to a change in tone duration. Hearing Research 1989, 41(1):15-22.
28. Kreuz R.J. The subjective familiarity of English homophones. Memory and Cognition 1987, 15(2):154-168.
29. Liberman A.M., Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985, 21(1):1-36.
30. Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 1998, 19(1):1-36.
31. Marslen-Wilson W., Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 1978, 10(1):29-63.
32. Mattingly I.G., Liberman A.M. Specialized perceiving systems for speech and other biologically significant sounds. Auditory function: Neurobiology bases of hearing 1988, 775-793. Wiley, New York: NY. G.M. Edelman, W.E. Gall, W.M. Cowan (Eds.).
33. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 1986, 18(1):1-86.
34. McGurk H., MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976, (264):746-748.
35. Meyer, J., Dentel, L., Meunier, F. (2010). Intelligibilité de la parole à plusieurs distances dans un bruit naturel. In Paper presented at the 10eme congrès français d'acoustique, Lyon, France.
36. Monzalvo K., Dehaene-Lambertz G. How reading acquisition changes children's spoken language network. Brain and Language 2013, (127):356-365.
37. Muneaux M., Ziegler J.C. Locus of orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Novel insights from the neighbour generation task. Language and Cognitive Processes 2004, 19(5):641-660.
38. Näätänen R. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology 2001, 38(1):1-21.
39. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Rinne T., Alho K. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118(12):2544-2590.
40. Näätänen R., Syssoeva O., Takegata R. Automatic time perception in the human brain for intervals ranging from milliseconds to seconds. Psychophysiology 2004, 41(4):660-663.
41. New B., Pallier C., Brysbaert M., Ferrand L. Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods 2004, 36(3):516-524.
42. Nusbaum H.C., Pisoni D.B., Davis C.K. Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report 1984, 10:357-376.
43. Paavilainen P., Karlsson M.-L., Reinikainen K., Näätänen R. Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1989, 73(2):129-141.
44. Pattamadilok C., Kolinsky R., Luksaneeyanawin S., Morais J. Orthographic congruency effects in the suprasegmental domain: Evidence from Thai. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61(10):1515-1537.
45. Pattamadilok C., Lafontaine H., Morais J., Kolinsky R. Auditory Word Serial Recall Benefits from Orthographic Dissimilarity. Language and Speech 2010, 53(3):321-341.
46. Pattamadilok C., Morais J., Kolinsky R. Naming in noise: The contribution of orthographic knowledge to speech repetition. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:1-12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00361.
47. Pattamadilok C., Morais J., Ventura P., Kolinsky R. The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French. Language and Cognitive Processes 2007, 22(5):700-726.
48. Pattamadilok C., Perre L., Dufau S., Ziegler J.C. On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 21(1):169-179.
49. Pattamadilok C., Perre L., Ziegler J.C. Beyond rhyme or reason: ERPs reveal task-specific activation of orthography on spoken language. Brain and Language 2011, 116(3):116-124.
50. Peereman R., Dufour S., Burt J.S. Orthographic influences in spoken word recognition: The consistency effect in semantic and gender categorization tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2009, 16(2):363-368.
51. Perre L., Bertrand D., Ziegler J. Literacy affects spoken language in a non-linguistic task: An erp study. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:1-8. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00274.
52. Perre L., Pattamadilok C., Montant M., Ziegler J.C. Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring?. Brain Research 2009, 1275:73-80.
53. Perre L., Ziegler J.C. On-line activation of orthography in spoken word recognition. Brain Research 2008, 1188:132-138.
54. Pulvermüller F., Kujala T., Shtyrov Y., Simola J., Tiitinen H., Alku P. Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. NeuroImage 2001, 14(3):607-616.
55. Pulvermüller F., Shtyrov Y. Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Progress in Neurobiology 2006, 79(1):49-71.
56. Pulvermüller F., Shtyrov Y., Kujala T., Näätänen R. Word specific cortical activity as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 2004, 41(1):106-112.
57. Rastle K., McCormick S.F., Bayliss L., Davis C.J. Orthography influences the perception and production of speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37(6):1588.
58. Richardson F.M., Seghier A.M., Leff A.P., Thomas M.S.C., Price C.J. Multiple routes from occipital to temporal cortices during reading. Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(22):8239-8247.
59. Sams M., Paavilainen P., Alho K., Näätänen R. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section 1985, 62(6):437-448.
60. Schaadt G., Pannekamp A., van der Meer E. Auditory phoneme discrimination in illiterates: Mismatch negativity: A question of literacy?. Developmental Psychology 2013, 49(11):1-12.
61. Scharinger M., Merickel J., Riley J., Idsardi W.J. Neuromagnetic evidence for a featural distinction of English consonants: Sensor-and source-space data. Brain and Language 2011, 116(2):71-82.
62. Seidenberg M.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1979, 5(6):546-554.
63. Shallice T. From neuropsychology to mental structure 1988, Cambridge University Press.
64. Shtyrov Y., Hauk O., Pulvermuller F. Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 19(4):1083-1092.
65. Shtyrov Y., Kimppa L., Pulvermuller F., Kujala T. Event-related potentials reflecting the frequency of unattended spoken words: A neuronal index of connection strength in lexical memory circuits?. Neuroimage 2011, 55(2):658-668.
66. Shtyrov Y., Pulvermuller F., Naatanen R., Ilmoniemi R.J. Grammar Processing Outside the Focus of Attention: An MEG Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(8):1195-1206.
67. Szwed M., Ventura P., Querido L., Cohen L., Dehaene S. Reading acquisition enhances an early visual process of contour integration. Developmental Science 2011, 15(1):139-149.
68. Taft M. Orthographically influenced abstract phonological representation: Evidence from non-rhotic speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2006, 35(1):67-78.
69. Taft M., Castles A., Davis C., Lazendic G., Nguyen-Hoan M. Automatic activation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58(2):366-379.
70. Taft M., Hambly G. The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language 1985, 24(3):320-335.
71. Tanenhaus M.K., Flanigan H.P., Seidenberg M.S. Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition 1980, 8(51):513-520.
72. Van Atteveldt N.M., Formisano E., Goebel R., Blomert L. Integration of letters and speech sounds in the human brain. Neuron 2004, 43(2):271-282.
73. Ventura P., Fernandes T., Cohen L., Morais J., Kolinsky R., Dehaene S. Literacy acquisition reduces the influence of automatic holistic processing of faces and houses. Neuroscience Letters 2013.
74. Ventura P., Morais J., Pattamadilok C., Kolinsky R. The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 2004, 19(1):57-95.
75. Ventura P., Pattamadilok C., Fernandes T., Klein O., Morais J., Kolinsky R. Schooling in western culture promotes context-free processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2008, 100(2):79-88.
76. Ziegler J.C., Ferrand L. Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1998, 5:683-689.
77. Ziegler J.C., Ferrand L., Montant M. Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks. Memory and Cognition 2004, 32(5):732-741.