Recognition-by-Components: A Bird's Eye View

How Animals See the World: Comparative Behavior, Biology, and Evolution of Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Wasserman, Edward A ^a   Biederman, Irving ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Brightness; Color; Comparative psychology; Object recognition; Pigeons; Shading; Visual object perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907995928     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334654.003.0012     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Astley, S. L., & Wasserman, E. A. (1992). Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons: All negative stimuli are not created equal. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 193-207.
2. Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2001). The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people vs. nonpeople images by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 29, 107-119.
3. Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F., Jr., & Knauss, K. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 219-234.
4. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
5. Biederman, I. (2000). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: A review of recent research and theory. Spatial Vision, 13, 241-253.
6. Biederman, I. (2007). Recent psychophysical and neural research in shape recognition. In Recent psychophysical and neural research in shape recognition (Eds.), Object recognition, attention, and action (pp. 71-88). New York: Springer.
7. Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (1999). One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Research, 39, 2885-2889.
8. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
9. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
10. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for 3D viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
11. Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-base determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64.
12. Blough, D. (1982). Pigeon perception of letters of the alphabet. Science, 218, 397-398.
13. Cabe, P. A. (1976). Transfer of discrimination from solid objects to pictures by pigeons: A test of theoretical models of pictorial perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 545-550.
14. Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recognition, 9, 65-68.
15. Cerella, J. (1979). Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 68-77.
16. Cerella, J. (1980). The pigeon's analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognition, 12, 1-6.
17. Cerella, J. (1982). Mechanisms of concept formation in the pigeon. In Mechanisms of concept formation in the pigeon (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 241-263). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Cerella, J. (1986). Pigeons and perceptrons. Pattern Recognition, 19, 431-438.
19. Cerella, J. (1990). Shape constancy in the pigeon: The perspective transformations decomposed. In Shape constancy in the pigeon: The perspective transformations decomposed (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Pattern recognition, Vol. VIII (pp. 145-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Cook, R. G., & Wasserman, E. A. (2004). Behavioral physiology: Visual perception mechanisms. In Behavioral physiology: Visual perception mechanisms (Ed.), Encyclopedia of animal behavior. Phoenix: Greenwood.
21. Cook, R. S., Wright, A. A., & Kendrick, D. F. (1990). Visual categorization by pigeons. In Visual categorization by pigeons (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Pattern recognition, Vol. VIII (pp. 187-214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. D'Amato, M. R., & Van Sant, P. (1988). The person concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 43-55.
23. Delius, J. D. (1992). Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 301-311.
24. DiPietro, N. T., Wasserman, E. A., & Young, M. E. (2002). Effects of occlusion on pigeons' visual object recognition. Perception, 31, 299-312.
25. Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Gibson, B. M., Lazareva, O. F., Gosselin, F., Schyns, P. G., & Wasserman, E. A. (2007). Non-accidental properties underlie shape recognition in mammalian and non-mammalian vision. Current Biology, 17, 336-340.
27. Gibson, B. M., Wasserman, E. A, Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2005). Applying bubbles to localize features that control pigeons' visual discrimination behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 376-382.
28. Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Bubbles: A new technique to reveal the use of visual information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41, 2261-2271.
29. Hayward, W. G. (1998). Effects of outline shape in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptions and Performance, 24(2), 427-440.
30. Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Riddles of natural categorization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, Biology, 308, 129-144.
31. Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., & Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285-302.
32. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
33. Kayaert, G., Biederman, I., & Vogels, R. (2003). Shape tuning in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3016-3027.
34. Kayaert, G., Biederman, I., & Vogels, R. (2005). Representation of regular and irregular shapes in macaque inferotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1308-1321.
35. Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
36. Kirkpatrick, K. (2001). Object recognition. In Object recognition (Ed.), Avian visual cognition.
37. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., & Wasserman, E. A. (1996). The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 60-67.
38. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1996). Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 465-475.
39. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1998). Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 34-46.
40. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2000). The pigeon's discrimination of shape and location information. Visual Cognition, 7, 417-436.
41. Lazareva, O. F., & Wasserman, E. A. (2008). Categories and concepts in animals. In Categories and concepts in animals (Ed.), Learning theory and behavior. Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference, Vol. 1 (pp. 197-226). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
42. Lazareva, O. F., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2007). Pigeons' recognition of partially occluded objects depends on specific training experience. Perception, 36, 33-48.
43. Lazareva, O. F., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2008). Pigeons and humans are more sensitive to nonaccidental than to metric changes in visual objects. Behavioural Processes, 77, 199-209.
44. Logothetis, N. K., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 577-621.
45. Lumsden, E. A. (1977). Generalization of an operant response to photographs and drawings/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 405-407.
46. Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45.
47. Mash, C., Arterberry, M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2007). Mechanisms of visual object recognition in infancy: 5-month-olds generalize beyond the interpolation of familiar views. Infancy, 12, 31-43.
48. Matsukawa, A., Inoue, S., & Jitsumori, M. (2004). Pigeon's recognition of cartoons: Effects of fragmentation, scrambling, and deletion of elements. Behavioural Processes, 65, 25-34.
49. Morgan, C. L. (1894). An introduction to comparative psychology. London: Walter Scott, Ltd.
50. Mumford, D., Kosslyn, S. M., Hillger, L. A., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1987). Discriminating figure from ground: The role of edge detection and region-growing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 84, 7354-7358.
51. Nagasaka, Y., Lazareva, O. F., & Wasserman, E. A. (2007). Prior experience affects amodal completion in pigeons. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 596-605.
52. Nederhouser, M., Mangini, M. C., Subramaniam, S., & Biederman, I. (2001). Translation between S1 and S2 eliminates costs of changes in the direction of illumination. Journal of Vision, 1, 92a.
53. Newell, F. N., & Findlay, J. M. (1997). The effect of depth rotation on object identification. Perception, 26, 1231-1257.
54. Peissig, J. J., Kirkpatrick, K., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2006). Effects of varying stimulus size on object recognition in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 419-430.
55. Peissig, J. J., Wasserman, E. A., Young, M. E., & Biederman, I. (2002). Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons. Vision Research, 42, 2051-2062.
56. Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1999). The pigeon's perception of depth-rotated shapes. Current Psychology of Cognition, 18, 657-690. Invited paper. [Reprinted in J. Fagot (Ed.), Picture perception in animals (pp. 37-70). Psychology Press, Ltd.: East Sussex, England.].
57. Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2000). Seeing things from a different angle: The pigeon's recognition of single geons rotated in depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 115-132.
58. Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2005). The role of edges in object recognition by pigeons. Perception, 34, 1353-1374.
59. Peterson, M. A. (2001). Object perception. In Object perception (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of perception. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.
60. Reid, S. L., & Spetch, M. L. (1998). Perception of pictorial depth cues by pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 698-704.
61. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2003). How visual cortex recognizes objects: The tale of the standard model. In How visual cortex recognizes objects: The tale of the standard model (Eds.), The visual neurosciences, Vol. 2 (pp. 1640-1653). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Roberts, W. A., & Mazmanian, D. S. (1988). Concept learning at different levels of abstraction by pigeons, monkeys, and people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 247-260.
63. Soto, F. A., & Wasserman, E. A. (2010). Error-driven learning in visual categorization and object recognition: A common elements model. Psychological Review, 117, 349-381.
64. Soto, F. A., & Wasserman, E. A. (2011). Asymmetrical interactions in the perception of face identity and emotional expression are not unique to the primate visual system. Journal of Vision, 11, 1-18.
65. Spetch, M., Friedman, A., & Reid, S. L. (2001). The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 238-255.
66. Spetch, M. L., & Friedman, A. (2006). Comparative cognition of object recognition. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 1, 12-35.
67. Tarr, M. J., Kersten, D., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). Why the visual system might encode the effects of illumination. Vision Research, 38, 2259-2275.
68. Ullman, S. (2007). Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 58-64.
69. Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1992). Discrimination of contourdeleted images by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 387-399.
70. Vecera, S. V., & O'Reilly, R.C. (1998). Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: An interactive account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 441-462.
71. Vogels, R., & Biederman, I. (2002). Effects of illumination intensity and direction on object coding in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 756-766.
72. Von Fersen, L., & Lea, S. E. G. (1990). Category discrimination by pigeons using 5 polymorphous features. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 69-84.
73. Wang, G., Obama, S., Yamashita, W., Sugihara, T., & Tanaka, K. (2005). Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1568-1575.
74. Wasserman, E. A. (1991). The pecking pigeon: A model of complex visual processing? A review of M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. M. Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior, Vol. XIII Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation. Contemporary Psychology, 36, 605-606.
75. Wasserman, E. A., Gagliardi, J. L., Cook, B. R., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Astley, S. L., & Biederman, I. (1996). The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 205-221.
76. Wasserman, E. A., Kiedinger, R. E., & Bhatt, R. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons:Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 235-246.
77. Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Van Hamme, L. J., & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 4, 336-341.
78. Wasserman, E. A., & Zentall, T. R. (2006). Comparative cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.
79. Young, M. E., Peissig, J. J., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2001). Discrimination of geons by pigeons: The effects of variations in surface depiction. Animal Learning and Behavior, 29, 97-106.
80. Zentall, T. R., Wasserman, E. A., Lazareva, O. F., Thompson, R. K. R., & Rattermann, M. J. (2008). Concept learning in animals. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 3, 13-45.