Recent psychophysical and neural research in shape recognition

Object Recognition, Attention, and Action

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 71-88

  Biederman, Irving ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349796562     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-73019-4_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Baker C, Behrmann M, Olson C (2002) Influence of visual discrimination training of the representation of parts and whole in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nat Neurosci 5:1210-1216.
2. Behrmann M, Peterson M, Moscovitch M, Suzuki S (2006) Independent representation of parts and the relations between them: evidence from integrative agnosia. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (32:1169-1184).
3. Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115-147.
4. Biederman I (1995) Visual object recognition. In: Kosslyn SM, Osherson DN (Eds) An invitation to cognitive science, 2nd edition, Vol. 2, visual cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 121-165.
5. Biederman I (2000) Recognizing depth-rotated objects: a review of recent research and theory. Spat Vis 13:241-253.
6. Biederman I, Bar M (1998) Same-different matching of depth-rotated objects. Paper presented at the Meetings of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Ft. Lauderdale, FL., May. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:1113.
7. Biederman I, Bar M (1999) One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Res 39:2885-2899.
8. Biederman I, Bar M (2000) Views on views: response to Hayward & Tarr (2000). Vision Res 40:3901-3905.
9. Biederman I, Cooper EE (1991) Evidence for complete translational and refl ectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception 20:585-593.
10. Biederman I, Cooper EE (1992) Size invariance in visual object priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:121-133.
11. Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC (1993) Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for 3D viewpoint invariance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1162-1182.
12. Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC (1995) Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: reply to Tarr and Bulthoff (1995). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:1506-1514.
13. Biederman I, Kalocsai P (1997) Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philos Trans R Soc London Biol Sci 352:1203-1219.
14. Biederman I, Subramaniam S (1997) Predicting the shape similarity of objects without distinguishing viewpoint invariant properties (VIPs) or parts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:998.
15. Biederman I, Subramaniam S, Bar M, Kalocsai P, Fiser J (1999) Subordinate-level object classifi cation reexamined. Psychol Res (62:131-153).
16. Cooper EE, Biederman I, Hummel JE (1992) Metric invariance in object recognition: a review and further evidence. Can J Psychol 46:191-214.
17. Cooper EE, Subramaniam S, Biederman I (1995) Recognizing objects with an irregular part. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:473.
18. Edelman S, Bulthoff HH (1992) Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects. Vision Res 32:2385-4000.
19. Esteky H, Tanaka K (1998) Effects of changes in aspect ratio of stimulus shape on responses of cells in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Soc Neurosci Abstr 24:899.
20. Hayward WG, Tarr MJ (1997) Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1511-1521.
21. Hayworth KJ, Biederman I (2005) Differential EMRI activity produced by variation in parts and relations during object perception. J Vision 5(8):740.
22. Hummel JE, Biederman I (1992) Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psycholog Rev 99:480-517.
23. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ (1987) Visual object processing: a cognitive neuropsychological approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, London.
24. Kayaert G, Biederman I, Vogels R (2003) Shape tuning in macaque inferior temporal cortex. J Neurosci 23:3016-3027.
25. Kayaert G, Biederman I, Op De Beeck H, Vogels R (2005b) Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 22:212-224.
26. Kayaert G, Biederman I, Vogels R (2005a) Representation of regular and irregular shapes in macaque inferotemporal cortex. Cereb Cortex 15:1308-1321.
27. Kobatake E, Tanaka K (1994) Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 71:856-867.
28. Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N (2000) Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J Neurosci 20:3310-3318.
29. Lades M, Vortbruggen JC, Buhmann J, Lange J, von der Malsburg C, Wurtz RP, Konen W (1993) Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Trans Comput 42:300-311.
30. Logothetis NK (1999) Paper presented at a workshop on Visual Object Recognition by Humans and Machines, Bad Homburg, Germany, May.
31. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Bulthoff HH, Poggio T (1994) View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Curr Biol 4:401-414.
32. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
33. Mel BW (1997) SEEMORE: combining color, shape, and texture histogramming in a neurally-inspired approach to visual object recognition. Neural Comput 9:777- 804.
34. Nederhouser M, Biederman I, Davidoff J, Yue X, Kayaert G, Vogels R (2005) The representation of shape in individuals from a culture with limited contact with regular, simple artifacts. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society. May.
35. Nowak LG, Bullier J (1997) The timing of information transfer in the visual system. In: Kaas J, Rockland K, Peters A (Eds) Extrastriate cortex, cerebral cortex Vol. 12. Plenum, New York, pp 205-241.
36. Pasupathy A, Connor CE (1999) Response to contour features in macaque V4. J Neurophysiol 82:2490-2502.
37. Poggio T, Edelman S (1990) A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 343:263-266.
38. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T (2002) Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:162-168.
39. Shepard RN, Cermak GW (1973) Perceptual-cognitive explorations of a toroidal set of free-form stimuli. Cognit Psychol 4:351-377.
40. Tanaka K (1993) Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. Science 262:685- 688.
41. Tanaka K (1996) Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:109-139.
42. Tarr MJ, Bulthoff HH (1995) Is human object recognition better described be geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1995). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:1494-1505.
43. Tarr MJ, Bulthoff HH, Zabinski M, Blanz V (1997) To what extent do unique parts infl uence recognition across viewpoint? Psychol Sci 8:282-289.
44. Tarr MJ, Williams P, Hayward WG, Gauthier I (1998) Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nat Neurosci 1:275-277.
45. Tsunoda K, Yamane Y, Nishizaki M, Tanifuji M (2001) Complex objects are represented in macaque inferotemporal cortex by the combination of feature columns. Nat Neurosci 4:832-838.
46. Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psychol Rev 84:327-352.
47. Tversky B, Hemenway K (1984) Objects, parts, and categories. J Exp Psychol Gen 113:169-193.
48. Vogels R, Biederman I (2002) Effects of illumination intensity and direction on object coding in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cereb Cortex 12:756-766.
49. Vogels R, Biederman I, Bar M, Lorincz A (2001) Sensitivity of macaque temporal neurons to differences in view-invariant vs metric properties of depth-rotated objects. J Cogn Neurosci 13:444-453.
50. Winston PH (1975) Learning structural descriptions from examples. In: Winston PH (Ed) The psychology of computer vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 157-209.
51. Wiscott L, Fellous J-M, Kruger N, von der Malsburg C (1997) Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching. IEEE PAMI 19:775-779.
52. Zerroug M, Nevatia R (1996) Volumetric descriptions from a single intensity image. Int J Comput Vis 20:11-42.