Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 34-46

  Kirkpatrick Steger, Kim ^a,c   Wasserman, Edward A ^a   Biederman, Irving ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PIGEONS AND DOVES;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COLUMBIDAE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0031609578     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.24.1.34     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
2. Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (1995, November). One-shot viewpoint invariance with nonsense objects. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
4. Brown, S. D., & Dooling, R. J. (1993). Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus Undulatus): II. Synthetic models. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 48-60.
5. Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recognition, 9, 65-68.
6. Cerella, J. (1979). Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 68-77.
7. Cerella, J. (1980). The pigeon's analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognition, 12, 1-6.
8. Cerella, J. (1982). Mechanisms of concept formation in the pigeon. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 241-263). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Cerella, J. (1986). Pigeons and perceptrons. Pattern Recognition, 19, 431-438.
10. Cerella, J. (1990). Shape constancy in the pigeon. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. B. Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation (Vol. 8, pp. 145-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
12. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
13. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). [Positional invariance in the pigeon]. Unpublished raw data.
14. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., & Wasserman, E. A. (1996). The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 60-67.
15. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1996). Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 465-475.
16. Marr, D. (1977). Analysis of occluding contour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 197B, 441-475.
17. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
18. Pinker, S. (1984). Visual cognition: An introduction. Cognition, 18, 1-63.
19. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize 3D objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
20. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Steele, K. M. (1990). Configurai processes in pigeon perception. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. B. Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative analysis of behavior: Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation (Vol. 8, pp. 111-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55-82.
23. Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1992). Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 387-399.
24. Waltz, D. (1975). Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 19-91). New York: McGraw Hill.
25. Wasserman, E. A. (1991). The pecking pigeon: A model of complex visual processing. [Review of Quantitative analyses of behavior, Vol. 8: Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation]. Contemporary Psychology, 36, 605-606.
26. Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Picture perception: A bird's eye view. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 184-189.
27. Wasserman, E. A., Gagliardi, J. L., Cook, B. R., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Astley, S. L., & Biederman, I. (1996). The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 205-221.
28. Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Van Hamme, L. J., & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 4, 336-341.
29. Watanabe, S., & Ito, Y. (1991). Discrimination of individuals in pigeons. Bird Behaviour, 9, 20-29.