The pigeon's perception of depth-rotated shapes

Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive

Volumn 18, Issue 5-6, 1999, Pages 657-690

  Peissig, Jessie J ^a   Young, Michael E ^b   Wasserman, Edward ^a   Biederman, Irving ^b  

^a E11 SSH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Object perception; Shape discrimination; Visual recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000790361     PISSN: 02499185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
2. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
4. Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recognition, 9, 65-68.
5. Delius, J. D. (1992). Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 20, 301-311.
6. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
7. Gross, C. G., Bender, D. G., & Rocha-Miranda, C. E. (1969). Visual receptive fields of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the monkey. Science, 166, 1303-1306.
8. Gross, C. G., Rocha-Miranda, C. E., & Bender, D. G. (1972). Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 96-111.
9. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., & Wasserman, E. A. (1996). The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 60-67.
10. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. (1994). View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-413.
11. Lumsden, E. A. (1977). Generalizations of an operant response to photographs and drawings/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various viewpoints. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 405-407.
12. Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1999a). The pigeon's ability to form a generalized representation. Unpublished manuscript.
13. Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1999b). Seeing things from a different angle: The pigeon's recognition of single geons rotated in depth. Unpublished manuscript.
14. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
15. Rock, I., & DiVita, J. (1987). A case of viewer-centered perception. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 280-293.
16. Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 109-139.
17. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55-82.
18. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
19. Tarr, M. J., Bülthoff, H. H, Zabinski, M., & Blanz, V. (1997). To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint? Psychological Science, 8, 282-289.
20. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
21. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-253.
22. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1992). Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 387-399.
24. Wasserman, E. A., Gagliardi, J. L., Cook, B. R., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Astley, S. L., & Biederman, I. (1996). The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 205-221.
25. Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Van Hamme, L. J., & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 4, 336-341.
26. Watanabe, S. (1997). Visual discrimination of real objects and pictures in pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 25, 185-192.