The effect of depth rotation on object identification

Perception

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 1231-1257

  Newell, Fiona N ^a,b   Findlay, John M ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; ROTATION;

ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ROTATION;

EID: 0031318971     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p261231     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bartram D J, 1974 "The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming" Cognitive Psychology 6 325-356
2. Bartram D J, 1976 "Levels of coding in picture - picture comparison tasks" Memory and Cognition 4 593-602
3. Biederman I, 1987 "Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding" Psychological Review 94 115-147
4. Biederman I, Gerhardstein P C, 1993 "Recognising depth-rotated objects: evidence for 3D viewpoint invariance" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 1162-1182
5. Biederman I, Ju G, 1988 "Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition" Cognitive Psychology 20 38-64
6. Bruce V, Valentine T, Baddeley A D, 1987 "The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition" Applied Cognitive Psychology 1 109-120
7. Bülthoff H, Edelman S, 1992 "Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 89 60-64
8. Cutzu F, Edelman S, 1994 "Canonical views in object representation and recognition" Vision Research 34 3037-3056
9. Davidoff J B, Ostergaard A L, 1988 "The role of colour in categorical judgements" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 40 533-544
10. Edelman S, 1995 "Class similarity and view-point invariance in the recognition of 3D objects" Biological Cybernetics 72 207-220
11. Edelman S, Bülthoff H H, 1992 "Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects" Vision Research 32 2385-2400
12. Edelman S, Weinshall D, 1991 "A self-organising multiple-view representation of 3D objects" Biological Cybernetics 64 209-219
13. Foley J D, 1987 "Interfaces for advanced computing" Scientific American 257 126-136
14. Hoffman D D, Richards W A, 1985 "Parts of recognition", in Visual Cognition Ed. S Pinker (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 65-96
15. Hummel J E, Biederman I, 1992 "Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition" Psychological Review 99 480-517
16. Humphrey K, Jolicoeur P, 1993 "An examination of the effects of axis foreshortening, monocular depth cues, and visual field on object identification" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46A 137-159
17. Humphrey K, Khan S C, 1992 "Recognising novel views of three-dimensional objects" Canadian Journal of Psychology 46 170-190
18. Humphreys G W, Riddoch M J, 1984 "Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36A 385-415
19. Jolicoeur P, 1985 "The time to name disoriented natural objects" Memory and Cognition 13 289-303
20. Jolicoeur P, 1992 "Identification of disoriented objects: a dual-systems theory", in Understanding Vision Ed. G W Humphreys (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific) pp 180-198
21. Jolicoeur P, Gluck M A, Kosslyn S M, 1984 "Pictures and names: Making the connection" Cognitive Psychology 16 243-275
22. Lawson R, Humphreys G W, Watson D G, 1994 "Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures" Perception 23 595-614
23. Lowe D G, 1985 Perceptual Organisation and Visual Recognition (Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff)
24. Marr D, 1982 Vision (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman)
25. Marr D, Nishihara H K, 1978 "Representation and recognition of the spatial organisation of three-dimensional shapes" Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 200 269-294
26. McMullen P A, Jolicoeur P, 1990 "The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections" Memory and Cognition 18 99-115
27. McMullen P A, Jolicoeur P, 1992 "The reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the top of rotated objects" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 807-820
28. Newell F N, 1993 Perceptual Recognition of Familiar Objects Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Durham, Durham, UK
29. Palmer S, Rosch E, Chase P, 1981 "Canonical perspective and the perception of objects", in Attention and Performance volume IX, Eds J Long, A Baddeley (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
30. Poggio T, Edelman S, 1990 "A network that learns to recognise three-dimensional objects" Nature (London) 343 263-266
31. Price C J, Humphreys G W, 1989 "The effects of surface detail on object categorisation and naming" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41A 797-828
32. Quinlan P T, Humphreys G W, 1993 "Perceptual frames of reference and two-dimensional shape recognition: further examination of internal axes" Perception 22 1343-1364
33. Rock I, DiVita J, 1987 "A case of viewer-centred object perception" Cognitive Psychology 19 280-293
34. Rock I, DiVita J, Barbeito R, 1981 "The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 719-732
35. Rosch E, Mervis C B, Gray W D, Johnson D M, Boyes-Braem P, 1976 "Basic objects in natural categories" Cognitive Psychology 8 382-439
36. Shepard R N, Metzler J, 1971 "Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects" Science 171 701-703
37. Tarr M J, 1995 "Rotating objects to recognise them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of 3D objects" Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2 55-82
38. Tarr M J, Bülthoff H H, 1995 "Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural-descriptions or by multiple-views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993)" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 1494-1505
39. Tarr M J, Pinker S, 1989 "Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition" Cognitive Psychology 21 233-282
40. Ullman S, 1989 "Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition" Cognition 32 193-254
41. Warrington E K, James M, 1986 "Visual object recognition in patients with right-hemisphere lesions: axes or features?" Perception 15 355-366
42. Warrington E K, Taylor A M, 1978 "Two categorical stages of object recognition" Perception 7 695-705
43. Weinshall D, Werman M, 1997 "On view likelihood and stability" IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 19 (2) 99-108