Representation of regular and irregular shapes in macaque inferotemporal cortex

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1308-1321

  Kayaert, Greet ^a   Biederman, Irving ^b   Vogels, Rufin ^a  

^a KU LEUVEN UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Object recognition; Shapes; Single cell; Symmetry

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIZE PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 23944525095     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi014     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ashby FG, Ell SW (2001) The neurobiology of human category learning. Trends Cogn Sci 5:204-210.
2. Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115-147.
3. Biederman I (1995) Visual object recognition. In: An invitation to cognitive science. Vol. 2: Visual cognition, 2nd edn (Kosslyn SM, Osherson DN, eds), pp. 121-165. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Biederman I, Bar M (1999) One shot-viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Res 39:2885-2899.
5. Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC (1993) Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1162-1182.
6. Biederman I, Kalocsai P (1997) Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 352:1203-1219.
7. Biederman I, Subramaniam S (1997) Predicting the shape similarity of objects without distinguishing viewpoint invariant properties (VIPs) or parts. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 38:998.
8. Biederman I, Subramaniam S, Bar M, Kalocsai P, Fiser J (1999) Subordinate-level classification reexamined. Psychol Res 62:131-153.
9. Borg I, Leutner D (1985) Measuring the similarity of MDS configurations. Multivar Behav Res 20:325-334.
10. Cooper EE, Subramaniam S, Biederman I (1995) Recognizing objects with an irregular part. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 36:473.
11. Dean P (1976) Effects of inferotemporal lesions on the behavior of monkeys. Psychol Bull 83:41-72.
12. Dobbins A, Zucker SW, Cynader MS (1987) Endstopped neurons in the visual cortex as a substrate for calculating curvature. Nature 329:438-441.
13. Freedman DJ, Riesenhuber M, Poggio T, Miller EK (2003) A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization. J Neurosci 23:5235-5246.
14. Green DM, Swets JA (1974) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Robert E. Krieger.
15. Gross CG, Rocha-Miranda CE, Bender DB (1972) Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. J Neurophysiol 35:96-111.
16. Hahn U, Ramscar M (2001) Similarity and categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Hegdé J, Van Essen D (2000) Strategies of shape representation in macaque visual area V2. J Neurosci 20(RC61):1-6.
18. Janssen P, Vogels R, Orban GA (2000) Selectivity for 3D shape that reveals distinct areas within macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science 288:2054-2056.
19. Kayaert G, Biederman I, Vogels, R (2003) Shape tuning in macaque inferior temporal cortex. J Neurosci 23:3016-3027.
20. Kimia BB (2003) On the role of medial geometry in human vision. J Physiol Paris 97:155-190.
21. Koffka K (1935) Principles of gestalt psychology. London: Lund Humphries,.
22. Lades M, Vorbruggen JC, Buhmann J, Lange J, von der Malsburg C, Wurtz RP, Konen W (1993) Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Trans Comput 42:300-311.
23. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Bülthoff HH, Poggio T (1994) View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Curr Biol 4:401-414.
24. Mazer JA, Vinje WE, McDermott J, Schiller PH, Gallant, JL (2002) Spatial frequency and orientation tuning dynamics in area V1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:1645-1650.
25. Op de Beeck H, Wagemans J, Vogels R (2001) Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes. Nat Neurosci 4:1244-1252.
26. Pasupathy A, Connor CE (1999) Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. J Neurophysiol 82:2490-2502.
27. Pasupathy A, Connor CE (2001) Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. J Neurophysiol 86:2505-2519.
28. Pasupathy A, Connor CE (2002) Population coding of shape in area V4. Nat Neurosci 5:1332-1338.
29. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T (1999) Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat Neurosci 2:1019-1025.
30. Sigala N, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex. Nature 415:318-320.
31. Tanaka K (1996) Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:109-139.
32. Tanaka K (2003) Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. Cereb Cortex 13:90-99.
33. Versavel M, Orban GA, Lagae L (1990) Responses of visual cortical neurons to curved stimuli and chevrons. Vision Res 30:235-248.
34. Vogels R (1999) Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 2: single cell study. Eur J Neurosci 11:1239-1255.
35. Vogels R, Biederman I, Bar M, Lorincz A (2001) Inferior temporal neurons show greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than to metric shape differences. J Cogn Neurosci 13:444-453.
36. Vogels R, Sáry G, Dupont P, Orban G (2002) Human brain regions involved in visual categorization. Neuroimage 16:401-414.
37. Young MP, Yamane S (1992) Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. Science 256:1327-1331.