The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 205-221

  Wasserman, Edward A ^a   Gagliardi, Joseph L ^a   Cook, Brigette R ^a   Kirkpatrick Steger, Kim ^a  

^a E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COGNITION; LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGEONS AND DOVES; ROTATION;

ANIMALS; COGNITION; COLUMBIDAE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; LEARNING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; ROTATION;

EID: 0030117531     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.22.2.205     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Astley, S. L., & Wasserman, E. A. (1992). Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons: All negative stimuli are not created equal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 193-207.
2. Bhatt, R. S. (1988). Categorization in pigeons: Effects of category size, congmity with human categories, selective attention, and secondary generalization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
3. Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F. Jr., & Knauss, K. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 219-234.
4. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115147.
5. Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (1995, November). One-shot viewpoint invariance with nonsense objects. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
6. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
7. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depthrotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
8. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Biilthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
9. Cabe, P.A. (1980). Picture perception in nonhuman subjects. In M. A. Hagen (Ed.), The perception of pictures (Vol. 2, pp. 305-343). New York: Academic Press.
10. Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recognition, 9, 65-68.
11. Cerella, J. (1990). Shape constancy in the pigeon: The perspective transformations decomposed. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. B. Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative Analyses of Behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 145-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Cook, B. R. (1994). Stimulus generalization of depth-rotated drawings. Unpublished honors thesis, University of Iowa.
13. Delius, J. D. (1992). Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 20, 301-311.
14. Delius, J. D., & Hollard, V. D. (1995). Orientation invariant pattern recognition by pigeons (Colitmba livid) and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109, 278-290.
15. Edelman, S., & Biilthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
16. Ferraro, D. R., & Grisham, M. G. (1972). Discrimination and generalization of complex visual shape variations in pigeons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 35, 915-927.
17. Gagliardi, J. L. (1994). Pigeons' perception of stimuli rotated in depth. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Iowa.
18. Guttman, H., & Kalish, H. I. (1956). Discriminability and stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 79-88.
19. Haber, R. N., & Hershenson, M. (1980). The psychology of visual perception (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
20. Hollard, V. D., & Delius, J. D. (1982). Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. Science, 218, 804-806.
21. Honig, W. K., Boneau, C. A., Burstein, K. R., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1963). Positive and negative generalization gradients obtained after equivalent training conditions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 111-116.
22. Honig, W. K., & Urcuioli, P. (1981). The legacy of Guttman & Kalish (1956): 25 years of research on stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 405-445.
23. Hummel, J. E. (1994). Reference frames and relations in computational models of object recognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 111-116.
24. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
25. Kalish, H. I., & Guttman, N. (1957). Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 139-144.
26. Kalish, H. I., & Guttman, N. (1959). Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: A test of the summation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 268-272.
27. King, M., Meyer, G. E., Tangney, J., & Biederman, I. (1976). Shape constancy and a perceptual bias towards symmetry. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 129-136.
28. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., & Wasserman, E. A. (1996). The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 60-67.
29. Kubovy, M., & Podgorny, P. (1981). Does pattern matching require the normalization of size and orientation? Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 24-28.
30. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Biilthoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. (1994). View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-414.
31. Lumsden, E. A. (1977). Generalization of an opérant response to photographs and drawings/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 405-407.
32. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 200, 269-294.
33. Massaro, D. \V. (1973). The perception of rotated shapes: A process analysis of shape constancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 413-422.
34. Pani, J. R. (1993). Limits on the comprehension of rotational motion: Mental imagery of rotations with oblique components. Perception, 22, 785-808.
35. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize 3D objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
36. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
37. Reynolds, G. S. (1961). Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 289-294.
38. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
40. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of threedimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
41. Spence, K. W. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 44, 430-444.
42. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55-82.
43. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comments on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Jour-
44. nal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
45. Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1992). Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 387-399.
46. Vauclair, J., Fagot, J., & Hopkins, W. D. (1993). Rotation of mental images in baboons when the input is directed to the left cerebral hemisphere. Psychological Science, 4, 99-103.
47. Vetter, G. H., & Hearst, E. (1968). Generalization and discrimination of shape orientation in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 753-765.
48. Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Picture perception: A bird's eye view. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 184-189.
49. Wasserman, E. A., & Astley, S. L. (1994). A behavioral analysis of concepts: Its application to pigeons and children. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of teaming and motivation (pp. 73-132). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
50. Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Van Hamme, L. J., & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 4, 336-341.
51. Wilkie, D. M. (1973). Attention and "visual field dependency" in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 7-15.