Evaluation of i-gel™ airway in children: A meta-analysis

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1072-1079

  Maitra, Souvik ^a   Baidya, Dalim K ^a   Bhattacharjee, Sulagna ^a   Khanna, Puneet ^b  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

airway; children; I gel; laryngeal mask airway; pediatric; supraglottic

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD STAIN; COUGHING; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; META ANALYSIS; PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESPIRATION CONTROL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOMACH TUBE; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE;

EID: 84907987579     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pan.12483     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. vanZundert TC, Brimacombe JR, Ferson DZ, et al,. Archie Brain: celebrating 30 years of development in laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 1375-1385.
2. ® supraglottic airway, adult and paediatric sizes. Intersurgical, Wokingham, Berkshire, United Kingdom 2010
3. Lee JR, Kim MS, Kim JT, et al,. A randomised trial comparing the i-gel (TM) with the LMA Classic (TM) in children. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 606-611.
4. Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, et al,. The I-gel, a single-use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 376-379.
5. ™) airway during anaesthesia in 120 children. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 1121-1126.
6. Das B, Mitra S, Jamil SN, et al,. Comparison of three supraglottic devices in anesthetised paralyzed children undergoing elective surgery. Saudi J Anaesth 2012; 6: 224-228.
7. ™ in Anaesthetised, Paralyzed Children Undergoing Elective Surgery. N Am J Med Sci 2012; 4: 453-457.
8. ™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery. Pediatr Anesth 2012; 22: 355-359.
9. Gasteiger L, Brimacombe J, Oswald E, et al,. LMA ProSeal(TM) vs. i-Gel(TM) in ventilated children: a randomised, crossover study using the size 2 mask. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56: 1321-1324.
10. Fukuhara A, Okutani R, Oda Y,. A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fibreoptic findings. J Anesth 2013; 27: 1-6.
11. Shariffuddin II, Wang CY,. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu Aura Once Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysedanaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 82-85.
12. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I,. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13.
13. ™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2014; 30: 195-198.
14. ™ in infants. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 362-367.
15. ™vs. classic laryngeal mask airway in small children. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014; 66: 127-130.
16. Jagannathan N, Sommers K, Sohn LE, et al,. A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children. Pediatr Anesth 2013; 23: 127-133.
17. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, et al,. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 286-287.
18. Beleña JM, Núñez M, Anta D, et al,. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30: 119-123.
19. Wong DT, Yang JJ, Jagannathan N,. Brief review: the LMA Supreme supraglottic airway. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 483-493.
20. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Pediatr Anesth 2005; 15: 229-234.
21. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Luepold B, et al,. Performance of the pediatric-sized i-gel compared with the Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask in anesthetized and ventilated children. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 102-110.
22. ™ supraglottic airway device in children. Pediatr Anesth 2012; 22: 765-771.
23. Shin WJ, Cheong YS, Yang HS, et al,. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 598-601.
24. Shi YB, Zuo MZ, Du XH, et al,. [Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2013; 93: 1978-1980.
25. Zhang X, Chen M, Li Q,. The ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway is more effective than the LMA-Classic in pediatric anesthesia: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2012; 24: 639-646.
26. Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK,. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31: 266-273.