Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: Systematic review with meta-analysis

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 266-273

  Maitra, Souvik ^a   Khanna, Puneet ^a   Baidya, Dalim Kumar ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DEVICE SAFETY; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPHONIA; FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HOARSENESS; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNX SPASM; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE; PRESSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SORE THROAT; STOMACH DISTENSION; SUPINE POSITION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VOCAL CORD; VOMITING; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; OROPHARYNX; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIME;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; OROPHARYNX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SUPINE POSITION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84902125578     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.EJA.0000435015.89651.3d     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal' - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:650-654.
2. Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, et al. Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15:428- 432. (Pubitemid 37491078)
3. Natalini G, Franceschetti ME, Pantelidi MT, et al. Comparison of the standard laryngeal mask airway and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in obese patients. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90:323-326. (Pubitemid 36304874)
4. Wong DT, Yang JJ, Jagannathan N. Brief review: the LMA Supreme supraglottic airway. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59:483-493.
5. Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, et al. Evaluation of the LMA SupremeTM in 100 nonparalysed patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:555-562.
6. vanZundert A, Brimacombe J. The LMA Supreme - a pilot study. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:209-210.
7. Rowley E, Dingwall R. The use of single-use devices in anaesthesia: balancing the risks to patient safety. Anaesthesia 2007; 62:569-574. (Pubitemid 46796317)
8. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme - a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:405-410.
9. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme - a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:79-83.
10. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, et al. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53:852-857.
11. Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37:815-819.
12. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27:602-607.
13. Ló pez AM, Valero R, Hurtado P, et al. Comparison of the LMA Supreme with the LMA Proseal for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107:265-271.
14. Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, et al. A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMA ProSealTM in children. Anaesthesia 2012; 67:632-639.
15. Van Zundert TC, Brimacombe Jr. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2012; 63:35-41.
16. Hayashi K, Suzuki A, Kasai T, et al. A comparison of the single-use laryngeal mask airway supreme (SLMA) with the reusable laryngeal mask airway proseal (PLMA) in anesthetized adult Japanese patients. Masui 2012; 61:1048-1052.
17. Belen?a JM, Nún? ez M, Anta D, et al. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30:119-123.
18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Int Med 2009; 151:264-269.
19. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5:13.
20. Hoşten T, Şahin TY, Kuş A, et al. Comparison of Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway during cholecystectomy. Balkan Med J 2012; 29:314-319.
21. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82:286-287. (Pubitemid 29057634)
22. Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, et al. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the supreme laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:262-265.
23. Goldmann K, Hoch N, Wulf H. Influence of neuromuscular blockade on the airway leak pressure of the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfall med Schmerzther 2006; 41:228-232.
24. Strube PJ. The LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:691.
25. Chen BZ, Tan L, Zhang L, Shang YC. Is muscle relaxant necessary in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery with a ProSeal LMA? J Clin Anesth 2013; 25:32-35.
26. Shariffuddin II, Wang CY. Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu Aura Once Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:82-85. (Pubitemid 350233213)