A randomised trial comparing the i-gel™ with the LMA Classic™ in children

Anaesthesia

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 606-611

  Lee, J R ^a   Kim, M S ^a   Kim, J T ^b   Byon, H J ^b   Park, Y H ^b   Kim, H S ^b   Kim, C S ^b  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD CARE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INFANT; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD;

AIR PRESSURE; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; INFANT; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE BREATHING; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; METHYL ETHERS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84862793214     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07072.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. White MC, Cook TM, Stoddart PA,. A critique of elective paediatric supraglottic airway devices. Pediatric Anesthesia 2009; 19 (Suppl. 1): 55-65.
2. Intersurgical, i-gel User Guide. (accessed 01/10/2011).
3. Bamgbade OA, Macnab WR, Khalaf WM,. Evaluation of the i-gel airway in 300 patients. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2008; 25: 865-6.
4. Janakiraman C, Chethan DB, Wilkes AR, Stacey MR, Goodwin N,. A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 674-8.
5. Uppal V, Gangaiah S, Fletcher G, Kinsella J,. Randomized crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA-Unique in anaesthetized, paralysed adults. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009; 103: 882-5.
6. Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R, Scholz J, Doerges V, Bein B,. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA-Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1118-24.
7. Keijzer C, Buitelaar DR, Efthymiou KM, et al., A comparison of postoperative throat and neck complaints after the use of the i-gel and the La Premiere disposable laryngeal mask: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2009; 109: 1092-4.
8. Teoh WH, Lee KM, Suhitharan T, Yahaya Z, Teo MM, Sia AT,. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 1173-9.
9. Shin WJ, Cheong YS, Yang HS, Nishiyama T,. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2010; 27: 598-601.
10. Mizushima A, Wardall GJ, Simpson DL,. The laryngeal mask airway in infants. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 849-51.
11. Park C, Bahk JH, Ahn WS, Do SH, Lee KH,. The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2001; 48: 413-7.
12. Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, Cros AM,. The I-gel, a single-use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2009; 53: 376-9.
13. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Luepold B, et al., Performance of the pediatric-sized i-gel compared with the Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask in anesthetized and ventilated children. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 102-10.
14. Beringer RM, Kelly F, Cook TM, et al., A cohort evaluation of the paediatric i-gel™ airway during anaesthesia in 120 children. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 1121-6.
15. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia, 4th edn. London: United Kingdom, 2007.
16. Cook TM, Cranshaw J,. Randomized crossover comparison of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with Laryngeal Tube Sonda during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005; 95: 261-6.
17. Kapila A, Addy EV, Verghese C, Brain AI,. The intubating laryngeal mask airway: an initial assessment of performance. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1997; 79: 710-3.
18. Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, Keller C, Brimacombe L, Brimacombe M,. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2004; 99: 1560-3.
19. Theiler LG, Kleine-Grueggeney M, Kaiser D, et al., Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 111: 55-62.
20. Ghai B, Makkar JK, Bhardwaj N, Wig J,. Laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: comparison between rotational, lateral and standard technique. Pediatric Anesthesia 2008; 18: 308-12.
21. Ghai B, Wig J,. Comparison of different technique of laryngeal mask placement in children. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology 2009; 22: 400-4.
22. Okuda K, Inagawa G, Miwa T, Hiroki K,. Influence of head and neck position on cuff position and oropharyngeal sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2001; 86: 122-4.
23. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K,. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004; 93: 528-31.
24. Hockings L, Heaney M, Chambers NA, Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS,. Reduced air leakage by adjusting the cuff pressure in pediatric laryngeal mask airways during spontaneous ventilation. Pediatric Anesthesia 2010; 20: 313-7.
25. von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Erb TO, Chambers NA, Heaney M,. Laryngeal mask airways-to inflate or to deflate after insertion? Pediatric Anesthesia 2009; 19: 837-43.
26. Licina A, Chambers NA, Hullett B, Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS,. Lower cuff pressures improve the seal of pediatric laryngeal mask airways. Pediatric Anesthesia 2008; 18: 952-6.
27. Goudsouzian NG, Denman W, Cleveland R, Shorten G,. Radiologic localization of the laryngeal mask airway in children. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 1085-9.
28. Inagawa G, Okuda K, Miwa T, Hiroki K,. Higher airway seal does not imply adequate positioning of laryngeal mask airways in paediatric patients. Pediatric Anesthesia 2002; 12: 322-6.
29. Weiss M, Engelhardt T,. Proposal for the management of the unexpected difficult pediatric airway. Pediatric Anesthesia 2010; 20: 454-64.