Comparison of size 2.5 i-gel™ with proseal LMA™ in anaesthetised, paralyzed children undergoing elective surgery

North American Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 4, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 453-457

  Mitra, Subhro ^a   Das, Bikramjit ^a   Jamil, Shahin N ^a  

^a ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

I gel; Pediatric patients; Proseal laryngeal mask airway

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; I GEL; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASK; MEDICAL DEVICE; MORBIDITY; OROPHARYNGEAL SEALING PRESSURE; PARALYSIS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SUPRAGLOTTIC MASK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84867521514     PISSN: 22501541     EISSN: 19472714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.101983     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Userguides/i-gel_users Guide_English.pdf. 2010. (Accessed January 10, 2012 at http://www.i-gel.com/).
2. Uppal V, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Comparison of the i-gel with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:264-268.
3. Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R, Scholz J, Doerges V, Bein B. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesthesia 2009;64:1118-1124.
4. Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M. Comparison of clinical performance of i-gel with LMA Proseal in Elective surgeries. Indian J Anesth 2009;53:302-305.
5. Gabbot DA, Beringer R. The iGEL supraglottic airway: A potential role for resuscitation? Resuscitation 2007;73: 161-162.
6. TM airway for ventilation and rescue intubation. Anaesthesia 2007;62:419-420.
7. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of the i-gel airway: A novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia 2005;60:1022-1026.
8. Jackson KM, Cook TM. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia 2007;62:388-393.
9. Keijzer C, Buitelaar DR, Efthymiou KM, Srámek M, Ten Cate J, Ronday M, et al. A comparison of postoperative throat and neck complaints after the use of the i-gel and the La Premiere disposable laryngeal mask: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1092-1095.
10. Richez B, Saltel L, Banchereau F, Torrielli R, Cros AM. A new single use supraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: An observational study of the i-gel. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1137-1139.
11. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, et al. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009;111:55-62.
12. Bopp C, Chauvin C, Schwaab C, Mayer J, Marcoux L, Diemunsch P. L'I-gel en chirurgie pediatrique: serie initiale. 51eme Congres National d'anesthesie et de Reanimation (SFAR) Paris, 23-26 september 2009. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2009;28.
13. Bopp C, Carrenard G, Chauvin C, Schwaab C, Diemunsch P. The I-gel in paediatric surgery: Initial series. New Orleans, USA: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Annual Meeting; 17-21 October, 2009. p. A147.
14. Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, Cros AM. The i-gel, a single use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: An observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009;53:376-379.
15. TM in children, measured with the manometric stability test. Paediatr Anaesth 2011;21:668-672.
16. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:528-531.
17. Comparison of Two Insertion Techniques of Proseal Laryngeal Mask airway by unskilled personnel in children (Accessed 2010 January 10, 2012, at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01191619).
18. TM in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery. (Accesed 2012 January 10, 2012, at http://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03757.x).
19. Shin WJ, Cheong YS, Yang HS, Nishiyama T. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:598-601.
20. TM in comparison with the laryngeal mask airway Classic TM and ProSealTM using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:135-139.
21. ® Instruction Manual/lma_pro-seal_book_issue_3_aug_2009.pdf. 2009. (Accessed 2011 January 22, 2011, at http://www.intaventdirect.co.uk).
22. Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, Subramanyam R, Wong DT, Chung F. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: A prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology 2010;112:652-657.