Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 355-359

  Goyal, Rakhee ^a   Shukla, Ravindra Nath ^a   Kumar, Gaurav ^a  

^a ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Classic laryngeal mask airway; oropharyngeal sealing pressures; pediatric i gel; ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

Indexed keywords

AIR LEAK; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BREATHING PATTERN; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTUBATION; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OROPHARYNGEAL SEALING PRESSURE; OROPHARYNX; OXYGEN SATURATION; PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUPRAGLOTTITIS;

AIR PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; OXYGEN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84858080863     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03757.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Uppal V, Fletcher G, Kinsella J,. Comparison of the i-gel with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 264-268.
2. Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R, et al. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA Unique in non-paralysed anaesthetised adult patients. Anesthesia 2009; 64: 1118-1124.
3. Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M,. Comparison of clinical performance of i-gel with LMA-Proseal in Elective surgeries. Indian J Anesth 2009; 53: 302-305.
4. i-gel user guide; [ instruction manual 2010.
5. Richez B, Saltel L, Banchereau F, Torrielli R, Cros M,. A new single use supraglottic airway with a noninflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study of the i-gel. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1137-1139. (Pubitemid 351450538)
6. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC,. Initial anatomic investigations of the i-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anesthesia 2005; 60: 1022-1026. (Pubitemid 41387859)
7. Bopp C, Chauvin C, Schwaab C, et al. L'I-gel en chirurgie pédiatrique: série initiale. 51ème Congrès National d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR) Paris, 23-26 September 2009. Ann Fr Anesth Réanim 2009; 28.
8. Bopp C, Carrenard G, Chauvin C, et al. The I-gel in paediatric surgery: initial series. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Annual Meeting; New Orleans, USA, 17-21 October, 2009; A147.
9. Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, et al. The i-gel, a single use supraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 376-379.
10. Karippacheril JG, Varghese E,. Crossover comparison of airway sealing pressures of 1.5 and 2 size LMA-ProSealTM and LMA-ClassicTM in children, measured with the manometric stability test. Pediatr Anesth 2011; 21: 668-672.
11. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, et al. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMAClassic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 528-531.
12. Goldmann K, Jakob C,. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 385-389. (Pubitemid 40352863)
13. Wong JG, Heaney M, Chambers NA, et al. Impact of laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures on the incidence of sore throat in children. Pediatr Anesth 2009; 19: 464-469.