A clinical evaluation of the i-gel™ supraglottic airway device in children

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 765-771

  Hughes, Corinna ^a   Place, Kelly ^b   Berg, Simon ^a   Mason, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL BERKSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; Equipment; I gel ; Pediatric; Supraglottic airway

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BREATH HOLDING; BREATHING APPARATUS; CHILD; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COUGHING; FACE MASK; FIBER OPTICS; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNGOSCOPY; LARYNX SPASM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OXYGEN DESATURATION; OXYGEN SATURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGURGITATION; SCHOOL CHILD; STOMACH TUBE; STRIDOR; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE; THROAT DISEASE; VOCAL CORD; WHEEZING;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EPIGLOTTIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; LARYNGOSCOPY; LARYNX; MALE; OPTICAL FIBERS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84863720692     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03893.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Alvarez M,. Safety and Efficiency of the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 969-972.
2. Beylacq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, et al. The i-gel™, a single use supraglottic airway device with a non inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 376-379.
3. Monclus E, Garces A, Vassileva I, et al. Paediatric i-gel™ laryngeal mask. Clinical and radiological evaluation. Abstracts from the ESPA European Congress of Pediatric Anaesthesiology 2-4th September 2011. Pediatr Anesth 2010; 20: 1128-1135.
4. Beringer R, Kelly F, Cook T, et al. A cohort evaluation of the paediatric i-gel™ airway during anaesthesia in 120 children. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 1121-1126.
5. Gatward JJ, Cook TM, et al. Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel™ airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 1124-1130.
6. Uppal V, Fletcher G,. Comparison of the i-gel™ with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 264-268.
7. Bamgbade O, MacNab W, et al. Evaluation of the i-gel™ airway in 300 patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 860-868.
8. Gibbison B, Cook TM, et al. Case series: Protection from aspiration and failure of protection from aspiration with the i-gel™ airway. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 415-417.
9. Mason D, Bingham R,. The laryngeal mask airway in children. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 760-763.
10. Kelly F, Slae S, Bayley G, et al. Pediatr Anesth 2008; 18: 947-951.
11. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, et al. Comparison of the LMA-Proseal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 528-531.
12. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Garcia G,. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 827-830.
13. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Pediatr Anesth 2005; 15: 229-234.
14. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C,. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2001; 11: 319-321.
15. Goldmann K, Jakob C,. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway:a randomized crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2004; 94: 385-389.
16. Sinha A, Sharma B, Sood J,. ProSeal as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in pediatric laparoscopy. Pediatr Anesth 2007; 17: 327-332.
17. Miller D,. A proposed classification and scoring system for supraglottic sealing airways: A brief review. Anaesth Anal 2004; 99: 1443-1339.
18. Cook T, Howes B,. Supraglottic airway devices:recent advances. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2011; 11: 56-61.
19. Wheeler M,. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 120 pediatric surgical patients: a prospective evaluation of characteristics and performance. Pediatr Anesth 2006; 16: 297-301.
20. Anon. Intersurgical i-gel™ User Guide.
21. Goldmann F, Jakob C,. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2.5 laryngeal mask airway proseal versus laryngeal mask airway-classic in paediatric patients. Anaesth Analg 2005; 100: 1605-1610.
22. Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H,. The size 1.5 proseal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized crossover investigation with the classic laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Analg 2006; 102: 405-410.
23. Mizushima A, Wardall G, Simpson D,. The laryngeal mask airway in infants. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 849-851.
24. Bagshaw O,. The size 1.5 laryngeal mask airway in paediatric practice. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12: 420-423.
25. Dubreuil M, Laffon M, Plaud B, et al. Complications of and fibreoptic assessment of size 1 laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 527-529.