Randomised crossover comparison of the Ambu® AuraOnce™ Laryngeal Mask with the LMA Classic™ laryngeal mask airway in paralysed anaesthetised patients

Anaesthesia

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 82-85

  Shariffuddin, I I ^a   Wang, C Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATRACURIUM; FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE;

ADULT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DEVICE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNGOSCOPY; LARYNX INJURY; LUNG CLEARANCE; LUNG VENTILATION; MALE; PARALYSIS; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT REUSE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 36849090885     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05284.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brain AIJ. The laryngeal mask: a new concept in airway management. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1983 55 : 801 5.
2. Americian Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003 98 : 1269 77.
3. Antioga K, Meszaros J, Malchesky PS, Mcdonnel GE. Prion disease and medical devices. American Society for Artificial Internal Organ Journal 2000 46 : S69 72.
4. Clery G, Brimacombe J, Stone T, Keller C, Curtis S. Routine cleaning and autoclaving does not remove protein deposits from re-usable laryngeal mask devices. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003 97 : 1189 91.
5. ® Laryngeal Mask in nonparalyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2005 101 : 1862 6.
6. Samsoon GLT, Young JRB. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987 42 : 487 90.
7. Verghese C, Berlet J, Kapila A, Pollard R. Clinical assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway - the LMA-Unique. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1998 80 : 677 9.
8. ® Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Classic in anesthetized, spontaneously breathing patients. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2007 35 : 57 62.
9. TM laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2007 62 : 719 22.
10. Vaida SJ, Yodfat UA. Angulation of the airway tube in the AMBU laryngeal mask could be responsible for improved insertion success. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2006 103 : 264.
11. Yodfat UA. Modified technique for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1999 89 : 1327.
12. Jaffe RA, Brock-Utne JG. A modification of the Yodfat laryngeal mask airway insertion technique. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology 2002 14 : 462 3.
13. Francksen H, Bein B, Cavus E, et al. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2007 24 : 134 40.
14. Brimacombe J. Anatomy. In : Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia: Principles and Practice, 2nd edn. Philadelphia : W.B. Saunders, 2004.
15. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1999 83 : 480 2.