Morphological Assessment of Embryo Viability

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 114-126

  Abeyta, Michael ^a   Behr, Barry ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

embryo; implantation; in vitro fertilization; morphology

Indexed keywords

HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN; UVOMORULIN;

ARTICLE; BIREFRINGENCE; BLASTOCYST; CELL COUNT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL VIABILITY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENT; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; OOCYTE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PREGNANCY RATE; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; WEAKNESS; ZONA PELLUCIDA; ZYGOTE; ANIMAL EMBRYO; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; NIDATION; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; REVIEW; STANDARD;

CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FEMALE; HUMANS; OOCYTES; PREGNANCY; RESEARCH DESIGN; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER;

EID: 84907677850     PISSN: 15268004     EISSN: 15264564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363553     Document Type: Article

References (168)

1. Arce J. C., Ziebe S., Lundin K., Janssens R., Helmgaard L., Sørensen P. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments. Hum Reprod: 2006; 21 8 2141 2148
2. Baxter Bendus A. E., Mayer J. F., Shipley S. K., Catherino W. H. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. Fertil Steril: 2006; 86 6 1608 1615
3. Paternot G., Wetzels A. M., Thonon F., et al. Intra- and interobserver analysis in the morphological assessment of early stage embryos during an IVF procedure: a multicentre study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol: 2011; 9 127
4. Mio Y., Maeda K. Time-lapse cinematography of dynamic changes occurring during in vitro development of human embryos. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2008; 199 6 e1 e5
5. Chavez S. L., Loewke K. E., Han J., et al. Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage. Nat Commun: 2012; 3 1251
6. Schatten G. The centrosome and its mode of inheritance: the reduction of the centrosome during gametogenesis and its restoration during fertilization. Dev Biol: 1994; 165 2 299 335
7. Mtango N. R., Potireddy S., Latham K. E. Oocyte quality and maternal control of development. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol: 2008; 268 223 290
8. Bergh C., Broden H., Lundin K., Hamberger L. Comparison of fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates of oocytes from large and small follicles. Hum Reprod: 1998; 13 7 1912 1915
9. Rosen M. P., Shen S., Dobson A. T., Rinaudo P. F., McCulloch C. E., Cedars M. I. A quantitative assessment of follicle size on oocyte developmental competence. Fertil Steril: 2008; 90 3 684 690
10. Rodríguez-Fuentes A., Hernández J., García-Guzman R., Chinea E., Iaconianni L., Palumbo A. Prospective evaluation of automated follicle monitoring in 58 in vitro fertilization cycles: follicular volume as a new indicator of oocyte maturity. Fertil Steril: 2010; 93 2 616 620
11. Downs S. M. A gap-junction-mediated signal, rather than an external paracrine factor, predominates during meiotic induction in isolated mouse oocytes. Zygote: 2001; 9 1 71 82
12. Albertini D. F., Combelles C. M., Benecchi E., Carabatsos M. J. Cellular basis for paracrine regulation of ovarian follicle development. Reproduction: 2001; 121 5 647 653
13. Coticchio G., Sereni E., Serrao L., Mazzone S., Iadarola I., Borini A. What criteria for the definition of oocyte quality? Ann N Y Acad Sci: 2004; 1034 132 144
14. Warriach H. M., Chohan K. R. Thickness of cumulus cell layer is a significant factor in meiotic competence of buffalo oocytes. J Vet Sci: 2004; 5 3 247 251
15. Feuerstein P., Cadoret V., Dalbies-Tran R., Guerif F., Bidault R., Royere D. Gene expression in human cumulus cells: one approach to oocyte competence. Hum Reprod: 2007; 22 12 3069 3077
16. Jungheim E. S., Macones G. A., Odem R. R., et al. Associations between free fatty acids, cumulus oocyte complex morphology and ovarian function during in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 6 1970 1974
17. Karuputhula N. B., Chattopadhyay R., Chakravarty B., Chaudhury K. Oxidative status in granulosa cells of infertile women undergoing IVF. Syst Biol Reprod Med: 2013; 59 2 91 98
18. Cheng E. H., Chen S. U., Lee T. H., et al. Evaluation of telomere length in cumulus cells as a potential biomarker of oocyte and embryo quality. Hum Reprod: 2013; 28 4 929 936
19. Xia P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: correlation of oocyte grade based on polar body, perivitelline space and cytoplasmic inclusions with fertilization rate and embryo quality. Hum Reprod: 1997; 12 8 1750 1755
20. Kahraman S., Yakin K., Dönmez E., et al. Relationship between granular cytoplasm of oocytes and pregnancy outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 11 2390 2393
21. Shen Y., Stalf T., Mehnert C., Eichenlaub-Ritter U., Tinneberg H. R. High magnitude of light retardation by the zona pellucida is associated with conception cycles. Hum Reprod: 2005; 20 6 1596 1606
22. Esfandiari N., Burjaq H., Gotlieb L., Casper R. F. Brown oocytes: implications for assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril: 2006; 86 5 1522 1525
23. Setti A. S., Figueira R. C., Braga D. P., Colturato S. S., Iaconelli A. Jr, Borges E. Jr. Relationship between oocyte abnormal morphology and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol: 2011; 159 2 364 370
24. Balakier H., Bouman D., Sojecki A., Librach C., Squire J. A. Morphological and cytogenetic analysis of human giant oocytes and giant embryos. Hum Reprod: 2002; 17 9 2394 2401
25. Rosenbusch B., Schneider M., Gläser B., Brucker C. Cytogenetic analysis of giant oocytes and zygotes to assess their relevance for the development of digynic triploidy. Hum Reprod: 2002; 17 9 2388 2393
26. De Sutter P., Dozortsev D., Qian C., Dhont M. Oocyte morphology does not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod: 1996; 11 3 595 597
27. Ebner T., Moser M., Tews G. Is oocyte morphology prognostic of embryo developmental potential after ICSI? Reprod Biomed Online: 2006; 12 4 507 512
28. ALPHA Scientists In Reproductive Medicine; ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online: 2011; 22 6 632 646
29. De Vos A., Van de Velde H., Joris H., Van Steirteghem A. In-vitro matured metaphase-I oocytes have a lower fertilization rate but similar embryo quality as mature metaphase-II oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod: 1999; 14 7 1859 1863
30. Shu Y., Gebhardt J., Watt J., Lyon J., Dasig D., Behr B. Fertilization, embryo development, and clinical outcome of immature oocytes from stimulated intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril: 2007; 87 5 1022 1027
31. Eichenlaub-Ritter U., Schmiady H., Kentenich H., Soewarto D. Recurrent failure in polar body formation and premature chromosome condensation in oocytes from a human patient: indicators of asynchrony in nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation. Hum Reprod: 1995; 10 9 2343 2349
32. Liu L., Oldenbourg R., Trimarchi J. R., Keefe D. L. A reliable, noninvasive technique for spindle imaging and enucleation of mammalian oocytes. Nat Biotechnol: 2000; 18 2 223 225
33. Waterman-Storer C. M. Microtubules and microscopes: how the development of light microscopic imaging technologies has contributed to discoveries about microtubule dynamics in living cells. Mol Biol Cell: 1998; 9 12 3263 3271
34. Pickering S. J., Johnson M. H. The influence of cooling on the organization of the meiotic spindle of the mouse oocyte. Hum Reprod: 1987; 2 3 207 216
35. Baka S. G., Toth T. L., Veeck L. L., Jones H. W. Jr, Muasher S. J., Lanzendorf S. E. Evaluation of the spindle apparatus of in-vitro matured human oocytes following cryopreservation. Hum Reprod: 1995; 10 7 1816 1820
36. Eichenlaub-Ritter U., Stahl A., Luciani J. M. The microtubular cytoskeleton and chromosomes of unfertilized human oocytes aged in vitro. Hum Genet: 1988; 80 3 259 264
37. Wang W. H., Meng L., Hackett R. J., Odenbourg R., Keefe D. L. The spindle observation and its relationship with fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in living human oocytes. Fertil Steril: 2001; 75 2 348 353
38. Wang W. H., Meng L., Hackett R. J., Keefe D. L. Developmental ability of human oocytes with or without birefringent spindles imaged by Polscope before insemination. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 7 1464 1468
39. Eichenlaub-Ritter U., Shen Y., Tinneberg H. R. Manipulation of the oocyte: possible damage to the spindle apparatus. Reprod Biomed Online: 2002; 5 2 117 124
40. Moon J. H., Hyun C. S., Lee S. W., Son W. Y., Yoon S. H., Lim J. H. Visualization of the metaphase II meiotic spindle in living human oocytes using the Polscope enables the prediction of embryonic developmental competence after ICSI. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 4 817 820
41. Cooke S., Tyler J. PP, Driscoll G. L. Meiotic spindle location and identification and its effect on embryonic cleavage plane and early development. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 11 2397 2405
42. Keefe D., Liu L., Wang W., Silva C. Imaging meiotic spindles by polarization light microscopy: principles and applications to IVF. Reprod Biomed Online: 2003; 7 1 24 29
43. Held E., Mertens E. M., Mohammadi-Sangcheshmeh A., et al. Zona pellucida birefringence correlates with developmental capacity of bovine oocytes classified by maturational environment, COC morphology and G6PDH activity. Reprod Fertil Dev: 2012; 24 4 568 579
44. Payne D., Flaherty S. P., Barry M. F., Matthews C. D. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod: 1997; 12 3 532 541
45. Tesarik J., Greco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod: 1999; 14 5 1318 1323
46. Nagy Z. P., Dozortsev D., Diamond M., et al. Pronuclear morphology evaluation with subsequent evaluation of embryo morphology significantly increases implantation rates. Fertil Steril: 2003; 80 1 67 74
47. Scott L. A., Smith S. The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod: 1998; 13 4 1003 1013
48. Scott L., Alvero R., Leondires M., Miller B. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 11 2394 2403
49. Tesarik J., Kopecny V. Assembly of the nucleolar precursor bodies in human male pronuclei is correlated with an early RNA synthetic activity. Exp Cell Res: 1990; 191 1 153 156
50. Balaban B., Yakin K., Urman B., Isiklar A., Tesarik J. Pronuclear morphology predicts embryo development and chromosome constitution. Reprod Biomed Online: 2004; 8 6 695 700
51. Zollner U., Zollner K. P., Hartl G., Dietl J., Steck T. The use of a detailed zygote score after IVF/ICSI to obtain good quality blastocysts: the German experience. Hum Reprod: 2002; 17 5 1327 1333
52. Salumets A., Hydén-Granskog C., Suikkari A. M., Tiitinen A., Tuuri T. The predictive value of pronuclear morphology of zygotes in the assessment of human embryo quality. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 10 2177 2181
53. James A. N., Hennessy S., Reggio B., Wiemer K., Larsen F., Cohen J. The limited importance of pronuclear scoring of human zygotes. Hum Reprod: 2006; 21 6 1599 1604
54. Nicoli A., Capodanno F., Moscato L., et al. Analysis of pronuclear zygote configurations in 459 clinical pregnancies obtained with assisted reproductive technique procedures. Reprod Biol Endocrinol: 2010; 8 77
55. Jaroudi K., Al-Hassan S., Sieck U., Al-Sufyan H., Al-Kabra M., Coskun S. Zygote transfer on day 1 versus cleavage stage embryo transfer on day 3: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod: 2004; 19 3 645 648
56. Ludwig M., Schöpper B., Al-Hasani S., Diedrich K. Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of the German embryo protection law. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 2 325 329
57. Montag M., van der Ven H.; German Pronuclear Morphology Study Group. Evaluation of pronuclear morphology as the only selection criterion for further embryo culture and transfer: results of a prospective multicentre study. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 11 2384 2389
58. Gardner R. L., Davies T. J. An investigation of the origin and significance of bilateral symmetry of the pronuclear zygote in the mouse. Hum Reprod: 2006; 21 2 492 502
59. Edwards R. G., Beard H. K. Oocyte polarity and cell determination in early mammalian embryos. Mol Hum Reprod: 1997; 3 10 863 905
60. Antczak M., Van Blerkom J. Temporal and spatial aspects of fragmentation in early human embryos: possible effects on developmental competence and association with the differential elimination of regulatory proteins from polarized domains. Hum Reprod: 1999; 14 2 429 447
61. Boiso I., Veiga A., Edwards R. G. Fundamentals of human embryonic growth in vitro and the selection of high-quality embryos for transfer. Reprod Biomed Online: 2002; 5 3 328 350
62. Shoukir Y., Campana A., Farley T., Sakkas D. Early cleavage of in-vitro fertilized human embryos to the 2-cell stage: a novel indicator of embryo quality and viability. Hum Reprod: 1997; 12 7 1531 1536
63. Sakkas D., Shoukir Y., Chardonnens D., Bianchi P. G., Campana A. Early cleavage of human embryos to the two-cell stage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection as an indicator of embryo viability. Hum Reprod: 1998; 13 1 182 187
64. Trounson A. O., Mohr L. R., Wood C., Leeton J. F. Effect of delayed insemination on in-vitro fertilization, culture and transfer of human embryos. J Reprod Fertil: 1982; 64 2 285 294
65. Balakier H., MacLusky N. J., Casper R. F. Characterization of the first cell cycle in human zygotes: implications for cryopreservation. Fertil Steril: 1993; 59 2 359 365
66. Capmany G., Taylor A., Braude P. R., Bolton V. N. The timing of pronuclear formation, DNA synthesis and cleavage in the human 1-cell embryo. Mol Hum Reprod: 1996; 2 5 299 306
67. Van Blerkom J. Occurrence and developmental consequences of aberrant cellular organization in meiotically mature human oocytes after exogenous ovarian hyperstimulation. J Electron Microsc Tech: 1990; 16 4 324 346
68. Meseguer M., Herrero J., Tejera A., Hilligsoe K. M., Ramsing N. B., Remohí J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 10 2658 2671
69. Montag M., Liebenthron J., Köster M. Which morphological scoring system is relevant in human embryo development? Placenta: 2011; 32 03 S252 S256
70. Edwards R. G., Purdy J. M., Steptoe P. C., Walters D. E. The growth of human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1981; 141 4 408 416
71. Van Royen E., Mangelschots K., Vercruyssen M., et al. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 5 1062 1069
72. Munné S., Cohen J. Unsuitability of multinucleated human blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod: 1993; 8 7 1120 1125
73. Lopata A., Kohlman D., Johnston I. The fine structure of normal and abnormal human embryos developed in culture. In: Beier H. M., Lindner H. R., eds. Fertilization of the Human Egg In Vitro. Heidelberg Springer: 1983; 189
74. Tesarík J., Kopecný V., Plachot M., Mandelbaum J. Ultrastructural and autoradiographic observations on multinucleated blastomeres of human cleaving embryos obtained by in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod: 1987; 2 2 127 136
75. Hardy K., Winston R. ML, Handyside A. H. Binucleate blastomeres in preimplantation human embryos in vitro: failure of cytokinesis during early cleavage. J Reprod Fertil: 1993; 98 2 549 558
76. Winston N. J., Braude P. R., Pickering S. J., et al. The incidence of abnormal morphology and nucleocytoplasmic ratios in 2-, 3- and 5-day human pre-embryos. Hum Reprod: 1991; 6 1 17 24
77. Hertig A. T., Rock J., Adams E. C., Mulligan W. J. On the preimplantation stages of the human ovum: a description of four normal and four abnormal specimens ranging from the second to the fifth day of development. Contrib Embryol: 1954; 35 199 220
78. Plachot M., Mandelbaum J., Junca A. M., Salat-Baroux J., Cohen J. Impairment of human embryo development after abnormal in vitro fertilization. Ann N Y Acad Sci: 1985; 442 336 341
79. Sadowy S., Tomkin G., Munné S., Ferrara-Congedo T., Cohen J. Impaired development of zygotes with uneven pronuclear size. Zygote: 1998; 6 2 137 141
80. Pickering S. J., Taylor A., Johnson M. H., Braude P. R. An analysis of multinucleated blastomere formation in human embryos. Hum Reprod: 1995; 10 7 1912 1922
81. Kligman I., Benadiva C., Alikani M., Munne S. The presence of multinucleated blastomeres in human embryos is correlated with chromosomal abnormalities. Hum Reprod: 1996; 11 7 1492 1498
82. Ambroggio J., Gindoff P. R., Dayal M. B., et al. Multinucleation of a sibling blastomere on day 2 suggests unsuitability for embryo transfer in IVF-preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Fertil Steril: 2011; 96 4 856 859
83. Pelinck M. J., De Vos M., Dekens M., Van der Elst J., De Sutter P., Dhont M. Embryos cultured in vitro with multinucleated blastomeres have poor implantation potential in human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod: 1998; 13 4 960 963
84. Saldeen P., Sundström P. Nuclear status of four-cell preembryos predicts implantation potential in in vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Fertil Steril: 2005; 84 3 584 589
85. Guerif F., Le Gouge A., Giraudeau B., et al. Limited value of morphological assessment at days 1 and 2 to predict blastocyst development potential: a prospective study based on 4042 embryos. Hum Reprod: 2007; 22 7 1973 1981
86. Guerif F., Lemseffer M., Leger J., et al. Does early morphology provide additional selection power to blastocyst selection for transfer? Reprod Biomed Online: 2010; 21 4 510 519
87. Ziebe S., Petersen K., Lindenberg S., Andersen A. G., Gabrielsen A., Andersen A. N. Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod: 1997; 12 7 1545 1549
88. Holte J., Berglund L., Milton K., et al. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod: 2007; 22 2 548 557
89. Scott L., Finn A., O'Leary T., McLellan S., Hill J. Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod: 2007; 22 1 230 240
90. Cummins J. M., Breen T. M., Harrison K. L., Shaw J. M., Wilson L. M., Hennessey J. F. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf: 1986; 3 5 284 295
91. Claman P., Armant D. R., Seibel M. M., Wang T. A., Oskowitz S. P., Taymor M. L. The impact of embryo quality and quantity on implantation and the establishment of viable pregnancies. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf: 1987; 4 4 218 222
92. Staessen C., Camus M., Bollen N., Devroey P., Van Steirteghem A. C. The relationship between embryo quality and the occurrence of multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril: 1992; 57 3 626 630
93. Giorgetti C., Terriou P., Auquier P., et al. Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod: 1995; 10 9 2427 2431
94. Van Royen E., Mangelschots K., De Neubourg D., et al. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod: 1999; 14 9 2345 2349
95. Wong C. C., Loewke K. E., Bossert N. L., et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol: 2010; 28 10 1115 1121
96. Cruz M., Garrido N., Herrero J., Pérez-Cano I., Muñoz M., Meseguer M. Timing of cell division in human cleavage-stage embryos is linked with blastocyst formation and quality. Reprod Biomed Online: 2012; 25 4 371 381
97. Lemmen J. G., Agerholm I., Ziebe S. Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online: 2008; 17 3 385 391
98. Lassalle B., Testart J., Renard J. P. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol. Fertil Steril: 1985; 44 5 645 651
99. Alikani M., Calderon G., Tomkin G., Garrisi J., Kokot M., Cohen J. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 12 2634 2643
100. Racowsky C., Combelles C. M., Nureddin A., et al. Day 3 and day 5 morphological predictors of embryo viability. Reprod Biomed Online: 2003; 6 3 323 331
101. Steer C. V., Mills C. L., Tan S. L., Campbell S., Edwards R. G. The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod: 1992; 7 1 117 119
102. Desai N. N., Goldstein J., Rowland D. Y., Goldfarb J. M. Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod: 2000; 15 10 2190 2196
103. Hnida C., Ziebe S. Total cytoplasmic volume as biomarker of fragmentation in human embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet: 2004; 21 9 335 340
104. Scott L. The biological basis of non-invasive strategies for selection of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update: 2003; 9 3 237 249
105. Sela R., Samuelov L., Almog B., et al. An embryo cleavage pattern based on the relative blastomere size as a function of cell number for predicting implantation outcome. Fertil Steril: 2012; 98 3 650 656, e4
106. Roux C., Joanne C., Agnani G., Fromm M., Clavequin M. C., Bresson J. L. Morphometric parameters of living human in-vitro fertilization embryos; importance of the asynchronous division process. Hum Reprod: 1995; 10 5 1201 1207
107. Van Royen E., Mangelschots K., De Neubourg D., Laureys I., Ryckaert G., Gerris J. Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 2 326 332
108. Rienzi L., Ubaldi F., Iacobelli M., et al. Significance of morphological attributes of the early embryo. Reprod Biomed Online: 2005; 10 5 669 681
109. Hardarson T., Hanson C., Sjögren A., Lundin K. Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 2 313 318
110. Magli M. C., Gianaroli L., Ferraretti A. P., Lappi M., Ruberti A., Farfalli V. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil Steril: 2007; 87 3 534 541
111. Ziebe S., Lundin K., Loft A., et al. CEMAS II and Study Group. FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 12 2575 2581
112. Munné S. Chromosome abnormalities and their relationship to morphology and development of human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online: 2006; 12 2 234 253
113. Puissant F., Van Rysselberge M., Barlow P., Deweze J., Leroy F. Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod: 1987; 2 8 705 708
114. Alikani M., Cohen J., Tomkin G., Garrisi G. J., Mack C., Scott R. T. Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation. Fertil Steril: 1999; 71 5 836 842
115. Plachot M., Junca A. M., Mandelbaum J., de Grouchy J., Salat-Baroux J., Cohen J. Chromosome investigations in early life. II. Human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod: 1987; 2 1 29 35
116. Pellestor F., Sèle B. Assessment of aneuploidy in the human female by using cytogenetics of IVF failures. Am J Hum Genet: 1988; 42 2 274 283
117. Munné S., Cohen J. Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Hum Reprod Update: 1998; 4 6 842 855
118. Magli M. C., Gianaroli L., Ferraretti A. P. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos. Mol Cell Endocrinol: 2001; 183 29 34
119. Racowsky C., Ohno-Machado L., Kim J., Biggers J. D. Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day? Hum Reprod: 2009; 24 9 2104 2113
120. Kashyap S., Cedars M., Shen S., Rosen M., Grady D., Wells G. Real data mathematical modeling to predict successful embryo implantation. Fertil Steril: 2008; 90 S224
121. Pelinck M. J., Hoek A., Simons A. H., Heineman M. J., van Echten-Arends J., Arts E. G. Embryo quality and impact of specific embryo characteristics on ongoing implantation in unselected embryos derived from modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 2 527 534
122. Fisch J. D., Sher G., Adamowicz M., Keskintepe L. The graduated embryo score predicts the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies better than a single day 3 evaluation and achieves results associated with blastocyst transfer from day 3 embryo transfer. Fertil Steril: 2003; 80 6 1352 1358
123. Wilding M., Dale B., Marino M., et al. Mitochondrial aggregation patterns and activity in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 5 909 917
124. Lin D. P., Huang C. C., Wu H. M., Cheng T. C., Chen C. I., Lee M. S. Comparison of mitochondrial DNA contents in human embryos with good or poor morphology at the 8-cell stage. Fertil Steril: 2004; 81 1 73 79
125. Zamah A. M., Browne R. W., Conti G., Jaggavarapu S. R., Sridhar V., Fujimoto V. Y. High density lipoprotein (HDL) particle size and composition predicts embryo fragmentation. Fertil Steril: 2009; 92 S96 S97
126. Browne R. W., Bloom M. S., Shelly W. B., Ocque A. J., Huddleston H. G., Fujimoto V. Y. Follicular fluid high density lipoprotein-associated micronutrient levels are associated with embryo fragmentation during IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet: 2009; 26 11-12 557 560
127. Fujimoto V. Y., Kane J. P., Ishida B. Y., Bloom M. S., Browne R. W. High-density lipoprotein metabolism and the human embryo. Hum Reprod Update: 2010; 16 1 20 38
128. Alikani M. Epithelial cadherin distribution in abnormal human pre-implantation embryos. Hum Reprod: 2005; 20 12 3369 3375
129. Liu L., Trimarchi J. R., Smith P. JS, Keefe D. L. Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to telomere attrition and genomic instability. Aging Cell: 2002; 1 1 40 46
130. Kalmbach K. H., Fontes Antunes D. M., Dracxler R. C., et al. Telomeres and human reproduction. Fertil Steril: 2013; 99 1 23 29
131. Liu L., Blasco M. A., Keefe D. L. Requirement of functional telomeres for metaphase chromosome alignments and integrity of meiotic spindles. EMBO Rep: 2002; 3 3 230 234
132. Jurisicova A., Varmuza S., Casper R. F. Programmed cell death and human embryo fragmentation. Mol Hum Reprod: 1996; 2 2 93 98
133. Liu L., Blasco M., Trimarchi J., Keefe D. An essential role for functional telomeres in mouse germ cells during fertilization and early development. Dev Biol: 2002; 249 1 74 84
134. Keefe D. L., Franco S., Liu L., et al. Telomere length predicts embryo fragmentation after in vitro fertilization in womentoward a telomere theory of reproductive aging in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 2005; 192 4 1256 1260, discussion 1260-1261
135. Alikani M., Schimmel T., Willadsen S. M. Cytoplasmic fragmentation in activated eggs occurs in the cytokinetic phase of the cell cycle, in lieu of normal cytokinesis, and in response to cytoskeletal disorder. Mol Hum Reprod: 2005; 11 5 335 344
136. Liu L., Trimarchi J. R., Smith P. J., Keefe D. L. Checkpoint for DNA integrity at the first mitosis after oocyte activation. Mol Reprod Dev: 2002; 62 2 277 288
137. Hardarson T., Löfman C., Coull G., Sjögren A., Hamberger L., Edwards R. G. Internalization of cellular fragments in a human embryo: time-lapse recordings. Reprod Biomed Online: 2002; 5 1 36 38
138. Dozortsev D., Ermilov A., El-Mowafi D. M., Diamond M. The impact of cellular fragmentation induced experimentally at different stages of mouse preimplantation development. Hum Reprod: 1998; 13 5 1307 1311
139. Eftekhari-Yazdi P., Valojerdi M. R., Ashtiani S. K., Eslaminejad M. B., Karimian L. Effect of fragment removal on blastocyst formation and quality of human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online: 2006; 13 6 823 832
140. Buster J. E., Bustillo M., Rodi I. A., et al. Biologic and morphologic development of donated human ova recovered by nonsurgical uterine lavage. Am J Obstet Gynecol: 1985; 153 2 211 217
141. Skiadas C. C., Jackson K. V., Racowsky C. Early compaction on day 3 may be associated with increased implantation potential. Fertil Steril: 2006; 86 5 1386 1391
142. Tao J., Tamis R., Fink K., Williams B., Nelson-White T., Craig R. The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod: 2002; 17 6 1513 1518
143. Feil D., Henshaw R. C., Lane M. Day 4 embryo selection is equal to Day 5 using a new embryo scoring system validated in single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod: 2008; 23 7 1505 1510
144. Pantos K., Makrakis E., Chronopoulou M., Biba M., Perdikaris A., Dafereras A. Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril: 2008; 89 3 573 577
145. Ebner T., Moser M., Shebl O., Sommergruber M., Gaiswinkler U., Tews G. Morphological analysis at compacting stage is a valuable prognostic tool for ICSI patients. Reprod Biomed Online: 2009; 18 1 61 66
146. Gardner D. K., Schoolcraft W. B. In vitro culture of human blastocyst. In: Jansen R., Mortimer D., eds. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Infertility and Genetics Beyond 1999. Carnforth Parthenon Press: 1999; 378 388
147. Ivec M., Kovacic B., Vlaisavljevic V. Prediction of human blastocyst development from morulas with delayed and/or incomplete compaction. Fertil Steril: 2011; 96 6 1473 1478, e2
148. Dokras A., Sargent I. L., Barlow D. H. Human blastocyst grading: an indicator of developmental potential? Hum Reprod: 1993; 8 12 2119 2127
149. Balaban B., Yakin K., Urman B. Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems. Fertil Steril: 2006; 85 3 559 563
150. Ahlström A., Westin C., Reismer E., Wikland M., Hardarson T. Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 12 3289 3296
151. Guerif F., Lemseffer M., Bidault R., et al. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Hum Reprod: 2009; 24 5 1051 1058
152. Papanikolaou E. G., Kolibianakis E. M., Tournaye H., et al. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod: 2008; 23 1 91 99
153. Richter K. S., Harris D. C., Daneshmand S. T., Shapiro B. S. Quantitative grading of a human blastocyst: optimal inner cell mass size and shape. Fertil Steril: 2001; 76 6 1157 1167
154. Hill M. J., Richter K. S., Heitmann R. J., et al. Trophectoderm grade predicts outcomes of single-blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril: 2013; 99 5 1283 1289, e1
155. Dean J. H., Chapman M. G., Sullivan E. A. The effect on human sex ratio at birth by assisted reproductive technology (ART) proceduresan assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2006. BJOG: 2010; 117 13 1628 1634
156. Alfarawati S., Fragouli E., Colls P., et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 2 520 524
157. Kroener L., Ambartsumyan G., Briton-Jones C., et al. The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril: 2012; 98 4 876 880
158. Levens E. D., Whitcomb B. W., Hennessy S., James A. N., Yauger B. J., Larsen F. W. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril: 2008; 90 6 2138 2143
159. El-Toukhy T., Wharf E., Walavalkar R., et al. Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed transfer cycles. BJOG: 2011; 118 13 1551 1556
160. Hashimoto S., Amo A., Hama S., Ito K., Nakaoka Y., Morimoto Y. Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification. Hum Reprod: 2013; 28 6 1528 1535
161. Fisch J. D., Rodriguez H., Ross R., Overby G., Sher G. The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos. Hum Reprod: 2001; 16 9 1970 1975
162. Neuber E., Rinaudo P., Trimarchi J. R., Sakkas D. Sequential assessment of individually cultured human embryos as an indicator of subsequent good quality blastocyst development. Hum Reprod: 2003; 18 6 1307 1312
163. Neuber E., Mahutte N. G., Arici A., Sakkas D. Sequential embryo assessment outperforms investigator-driven morphological assessment at selecting a good quality blastocyst. Fertil Steril: 2006; 85 3 794 796
164. Rienzi L., Ubaldi F., Iacobelli M., et al. Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod: 2002; 17 7 1852 1855
165. Racowsky C., Stern J. E., Gibbons W. E., Behr B., Pomeroy K. O., Biggers J. D. National collection of embryo morphology data into Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere asymmetry, and live birth rate. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 6 1985 1989
166. Vernon M., Stern J. E., Ball G. D., Wininger D., Mayer J., Racowsky C. Utility of the national embryo morphology data collection by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART): correlation between day-3 morphology grade and live-birth outcome. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 8 2761 2763
167. Newmark J. A., Warger W. C. II, Chang C., et al. Determination of the number of cells in preimplantation embryos by using noninvasive optical quadrature microscopy in conjunction with differential interference contrast microscopy. Microsc Microanal: 2007; 13 2 118 127
168. Nagy Z. P., Janssenswillen C., Janssens R., et al. Timing of oocyte activation, pronucleus formation and cleavage in humans after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with testicular spermatozoa and after ICSI or in-vitro fertilization on sibling oocytes with ejaculated spermatozoa. Hum Reprod: 1998; 13 6 1606 1612