Differential retention and divergent resolution of duplicate genes following whole-genome duplication

Genome Research

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1665-1675

  McGrath, Casey L ^a   Gout, Jean Francois ^a   Johri, Parul ^a   Doak, Thomas G ^a   Lynch, Michael ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ALLOPOLYPLOIDY; ARTICLE; AUTOPOLYPLOIDY; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DUPLICATE GENE; GENE CONVERSION; GENE LOSS; GENE NUMBER; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; GENOME SIZE; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PARAMECIUM; PARAMECIUM AURELIA; PARAMECIUM SEXAURELIA; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; WHOLE GENOME DUPLICATION; CLASSIFICATION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE CONVERSION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME, PROTOZOAN; PARAMECIUM AURELIA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84907528769     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.173740.114     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Amborella Genome Project. 2013. The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 342: 1241089.
2. Amoutzias GD, He Y, Gordon J, Mossialos D, Oliver SG, Van de Peer Y. 2010. Posttranslational regulation impacts the fate of duplicated genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 2967-2971.
3. Arnaiz O, Sperling L. 2011. ParameciumDB in 2011: new tools and new data for functional and comparative genomics of the model ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nucleic Acids Res (Suppl 1) 39: D635-D636.
4. Aury J-M, Jaillon O, Duret L, Noel B, Jubin C, Porcel B, Segurens B, Daubin V, Anthouard V, Aiach N, et al. 2006. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444: 171-178.
5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57: 289-300.
6. Bikard D, Patel D, Le Mette C, Giorgi V, Camilleri C, Bennett MJ, Loudet O. 2009. Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 323: 623-626.
7. Birchler JA, Riddle NC, Auger DL, Veitia RA. 2005. Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. Trends Genet 21: 219-226.
8. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 421.
9. Catania F,Wurmser F, PotekhinAA, Przybos E, LynchM. 2009. Genetic diversity in the Paramecium aurelia species complex.Mol Biol Evol 26: 421-431.
10. Chapman BA, Bowers JE, Feltus FA, Paterson AH. 2006. Buffering of crucial functions by paleologous duplicated genes may contribute cyclicality to angiosperm genome duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 2730-2735.
11. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. 2008. Probabilistic cross-species inference of orthologous genomic regions created by whole-genome duplication in yeast. Genetics 179: 1681-1692.
12. Decatur WA, Hall JA, Smith JJ, Li W, Sower SA. 2013. Insight from the lamprey genome: glimpsing early vertebrate development via neuroendocrine-associated genes and shared synteny of gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH). Gen Comp Endocrinol 192: 237-245.
13. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bull 19: 11-15.
14. Duret L, Galtier N. 2009. Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10: 285-311.
15. Duret L, Cohen J, Jubin C, Dessen P, Gout JF, Mousset S, Aury JM, Jaillon O, Noel B, Arnaiz O, et al. 2008. Analysis of sequence variability in the macronuclear DNA of Paramecium tetraurelia: a somatic view of the germline. Genome Res 18: 585-596.
16. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792-1797.
17. Evangelisti AM, Conant GC. 2010. Nonrandom survival of gene conversions among yeast ribosomal proteins duplicated through genome doubling. Genome Biol Evol 2: 826-834.
18. Foissac S, Gouzy J, Rombauts S, Mathe C, Amselem J, Sterk L, Van de Peer Y, Rouze P, Schiex T. 2008. Genome annotation in plants and fungi: EuGene as a model platform. Current Bioinformatics 3: 87-97.
19. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan Y-I, Postlethwait J. 1999. The preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151: 1531-1545.
20. Freeling M. 2008. The evolutionary position of subfunctionalization, downgraded. Genome Dyn 4: 25-40.
21. Freeling M, Thomas BC. 2006. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res 16: 805-814.
22. Galtier N. 2003. Gene conversion drives GC content evolution in mammalian histones. Trends Genet 19: 65-68.
23. Galtier N, Piganeau G, Mouchiroud D, Duret L. 2001. GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis. Genetics 159: 907-911.
24. Gout J-F, Duret L, Kahn D. 2009. Differential retention of metabolic genes following whole-genome duplication. Mol Biol Evol 26: 1067-1072.
25. Gout J-F, Kahn D, Duret L. 2010. The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution. PLoS Genet 6: e1000944.
26. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, HordijkW, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59: 307-321.
27. Hahn MW. 2009. Distinguishing among evolutionary models for the maintenance of gene duplicates. J Hered 100: 605-617.
28. He X, Zhang J. 2005. Gene complexity and gene duplicability. Curr Biol 15: 1016-1021.
29. Holland PWH, Garcia-Fernandez J, Williams NA, Sidow A. 1994. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Development (Suppl) 1994: 125-133.
30. Huang X, Madan A. 1999. CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res 9: 868-877.
31. Hughes AL. 1994. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 256: 119-124.
32. Hughes T, Liberles DA. 2008. Whole-genome duplications in the ancestral vertebrate are detectable in the distribution of gene family sizes of tetrapod species. J Mol Evol 67: 343-357.
33. Innan H, Kondrashov F. 2010. The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models. Nat Rev Genet 11: 97-108.
34. Jaillon O, Bouhouche K, Gout JF, Aury JM, Noel B, Saudemont B, Nowacki M, Serrano V, Porcel BM, Segurens B, et al. 2008. Translational control of intron splicing in eukaryotes. Nature 451: 359-362.
35. Jiao YN, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, Tomsho LP, Hu Y, Liang HY, Soltis PS, et al. 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473: 97-100.
36. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. 2013. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol 14: R36.
37. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111-120.
38. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memoryefficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10: R25.
39. Lynch M. 2010. Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet 26: 345-352.
40. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151-1155.
41. Lynch M, Force AG. 2000. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am Nat 156: 590-605.
42. Lynch M, O'Hely M,Walsh B, Force A. 2001. The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate. Genetics 159: 1789-1804.
43. Makino T, McLysaght A. 2012. Positionally biased gene loss after whole genome duplication: evidence from human, yeast, and plant. Genome Res 22: 2427-2435.
44. Masly JP, Jones CD, Noor MAF, Locke J, Orr HA. 2006. Gene transposition as a cause of hybrid sterility in Drosophila. Science 313: 1448-1450.
45. McGrath CL, Lynch M. 2012. Evolutionary significance of whole-genome duplication. In Polyploidy and genome evolution (ed. Soltis PS, Soltis DE), pp. 1-20. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
46. McGrath CL, Gout JF, Doak TG, Yanagi A, Lynch M. 2014. Insights into three whole-genome duplications gleaned from the Paramecium caudatum genome sequence. Genetics doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.163287.
47. Meyer A, Van de Peer Y. 2005. From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). BioEssays 27: 937-945.
48. Mi H, Muruganujan A, Thomas PD. 2012. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res 41: D377-D386.
49. Miller JR, Delcher AL, Koren S, Venter E,Walenz BP, Brownley A, Johnson J, Li K, Mobarry C, Sutton G. 2008. Aggressive assembly of pyrosequencing reads with mates. Bioinformatics 24: 2818-2824.
50. Mizuta Y, Harushima Y, Kurata N. 2010. Rice pollen hybrid incompatibility caused by reciprocal gene loss of duplicated genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 20417-20422.
51. Morin RD, Chang E, Petrescu A, Liao N, Griffith M, ChowW, Kirkpatrick R, Butterfield YS, Young AC, Stott J, et al. 2006. Sequencing and analysis of 10,967 full-length cDNA clones from Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis reveals post-tetraploidization transcriptome remodeling. Genome Res 16: 796-803.
52. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
53. Oka HI. 1988. Functions and genetic bases of reproductive barriers. In Origin of cultivated rice (ed. Oka HI), pp. 181-209. Japan Scientific Societies Press/Elsevier, Tokyo.
54. Panopoulou G, Poustka AJ. 2005. Timing and mechanism of ancient vertebrate genome duplications-the adventure of a hypothesis. Trends Genet 21: 559-567.
55. Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD. 2003. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424: 194-197.
56. Postlethwait JH, Woods IG, Ngo-Hazelett P, Yan YL, Kelly PD, Chu F, Huang H, Hill-Force A, Talbot WS. 2000. Zebrafish comparative genomics and the origins of vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res 10: 1890-1902.
57. Putnam NH, Butts T, Ferrier DEK, Furlong RF, Hellsten U, Kawashima T, Robinson-Rechavi M, Shoguchi E, Terry A, Yu J-K, et al. 2008. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature 453: 1064-1071.
58. Scannell DR, Byrne KP, Gordon JL, Wong S, Wolfe KH. 2006. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440: 341-345.
59. Scannell DR, Frank AC, Conant GC, Byrne KP, Woolfit M, Wolfe KH. 2007. Independent sorting-out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole-genome duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104: 8397-8402.
60. Schiex T, Moisan A, Rouze P. 2001. EuGene: an eucaryotic gene finder that combines several sources of evidence. In Computational biology (ed. Gascuel O, Sagot M-F), pp. 111-125. Springer, Berlin.
61. Sharp PM, Li WH. 1987. The codon Adaptation Index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 1281-1295.
62. Shpak M. 2005. The role of deleterious mutations in allopatric speciation. Evolution 59: 1389-1399.
63. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu C, ZabeauM, Van de Peer Y. 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 13627-13632.
64. Sonneborn TM. 1975. The Paramecium aurelia complex of fourteen sibling species. Trans Am Microsc Soc 94: 155-178.
65. Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R, Haussler D. 2008. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24: 637-644.
66. Sung W, Tucker AE, Doak TG, Choi E, Thomas WK, Lynch M. 2012. Extraordinary genome stability in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 19339-19344.
67. Takuno S, Nishio T, Satta Y, Innan H. 2008. Preservation of a pseudogene by gene conversion and diversifying selection. Genetics 180: 517-531.
68. Taylor JS, Raes J. 2004. Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. Annu Rev Genet 38: 615-643.
69. Teshima KM, Innan H. 2004. The effect of gene conversion on the divergence between duplicated genes. Genetics 166: 1553-1560.
70. Thomas BC, Pedersen B, Freeling M. 2006. Following tetraploidy in an Arabidopsis ancestor, genes were removed preferentially from one homeolog leaving clusters enriched in dose-sensitive genes. Genome Res 16: 934-946.
71. Thomson JM, Gaucher EA, Burgan MF, De Kee DW, Li T, Aris JP, Benner SA. 2005. Resurrecting ancestral alcohol dehydrogenases from yeast. Nat Genet 37: 630-635.
72. Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn JL, Lior P. 2012. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol 31: 46-53.
73. Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A. 2009. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet 10: 725-732.
74. Veitia RA. 2002. Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency. BioEssays 24: 175-184.
75. Veitia RA, Bottani S, Birchler JA. 2008. Cellular reactions to gene dosage imbalance: genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic effects. Trends Genet 24: 390-397.
76. Walsh JB. 1987. Sequence-dependent gene conversion: can duplicated genes diverge fast enough to escape conversion? Genetics 117: 543-557.
77. Werth CR,Windham MD. 1991. A model for divergent, allopatric speciation of polyploid Pteridophytes resulting from silencing of duplicate-gene expression. Am Nat 137: 515-526.
78. Wolfe KH, Shields DC. 1997.Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387: 708-713.
79. Woodhouse MR, Schnable JC, Pedersen BS, Lyons E, Damon L, Shabarinath S, Freeling M. 2010. Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homeologs. PLoS Biol 8: 1-15.
80. Woolfit M, Wolfe K. 2005. The gene duplication that greased society's wheels. Nat Genet 37: 566-567.
81. Wu X, Qi X. 2010. Genes encoding hub and bottleneck enzymes of the Arabidopsis metabolic network preferentially retain homeologs through whole genome duplication. BMC Evol Biol 10: 145.
82. Wu Y, Zhu Z, Ligeng M, Chen M. 2008. The preferential retention of starch synthesis genes reveals the impact of whole-genome duplication on grass evolution. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1003-1006.
83. Yamagata Y, Yamamoto E, Aya K, Win KT, Doi K. Sobrizal, Tomoko I, Kanamori H,Wu J, Matsumoto T, et al. 2010. Mitochondrial gene in the nuclear genome induces reproductive barrier in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 1494-1499.
84. Yang ZH. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1586-1591.