Cellular reactions to gene dosage imbalance: genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic effects

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 390-397

  Veitia, Reiner A ^a,b,c   Bottani, Samuel ^c,d,e   Birchler, James A ^f  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b INSTITUT COCHIN   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DIDEROT   (France)

^e INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN;

ANEUPLOIDY; DROSOPHILA; GENE CONTROL; GENE DELETION; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MAMMAL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REVIEW; RNA TRANSLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STOICHIOMETRY; YEAST;

ANEUPLOIDY; DOSAGE COMPENSATION, GENETIC; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOMICS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MODELS, GENETIC; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 48949115115     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.05.005     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Omholt S.W., et al. Gene regulatory networks generating the phenomena of additivity, dominance and epistasis. Genetics 155 (2000) 969-980
2. Birchler J.A., et al. Dosage-dependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. Dev. Biol. 234 (2001) 275-288
3. Veitia R.A. Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency. Bioessays 24 (2002) 175-184
4. Veitia R.A. Nonlinear effects in macromolecular assembly and dosage sensitivity. J. Theor. Biol. 220 (2003) 19-25
5. Papp B., et al. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424 (2003) 194-197
6. Jansen R., et al. Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12 (2002) 37-46
7. Ettwiller L., and Veitia R.A. Protein coevolution and isoexpression in yeast macromolecular complexes. Comp. Funct. Genom. 2007 (2007) 57721
8. Lupski J.R. Genomic disorders: structural features of the genome can lead to DNA rearrangements and human disease traits. Trends Genet. 14 (1998) 417-422
9. Veitia R.A. Gene dosage balance: deletions, duplications and dominance. Trends Genet. 21 (2005) 33-35
10. Yang J., et al. Organismal complexity, protein complexity, and gene duplicability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 15661-15665
11. Blanc G., and Wolfe K.H. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell 16 (2004) 1679-1691
12. Maere S., et al. Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 5454-5459
13. Freeling M., and Thomas B.C. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploid, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res. 16 (2006) 805-814
14. Aury J.-M., et al. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444 (2006) 171-178
15. Veitia R.A. Paralogs in polyploids: one for all and all for one?. Plant Cell 17 (2005) 4-11
16. Koszul R., et al. Eucaryotic genome evolution through the spontaneous duplication of large chromosomal segments. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 234-243
17. Dopman E.B., and Hartl D.L. A protrait of copy-number polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007) 19920-19925
18. Li L., et al. Preferential duplication in the sparse part of yeast protein interaction network. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 (2006) 2467-2473
19. McCarroll S.A., and Altshuler D.M. Copy-number variation and association studies of human disease. Nat. Genet. 39 (2007) S37-S42
20. Cooper G.M., et al. Mutational and selective effects on copy-number variants in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39 (2007) S22-S29
21. Bray D., and Lay S. Computer-based analysis of the binding steps in protein complex formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997) 13493-13498
22. Cole G.M., et al. Stoichiometry of G protein subunits affects the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromone signal transduction pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10 (1990) 510-517
23. Hamm H.E. How activated receptors couple to G proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001) 4819-4821
24. Vincent O., et al. Subcellular localization of the Snf1 kinase is regulated by specific beta subunits and a novel glucose signaling mechanism. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 1104-1114
25. Liang H., et al. Protein under-wrapping causes dosage sensitivity and decreases gene duplicability. PLoS Genet. 4 (2008) e11
26. Sopko R., et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol. Cell 21 (2006) 319-330
27. Hahn M.W., et al. Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: does connectivity equal constraint?. J. Mol. Evol. 58 (2004) 203-211
28. Tong A.H., et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303 (2004) 808-813
29. Wigley W.C., et al. Protein solubility and folding monitored in vivo by structural complementation of a genetic marker protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 19 (2001) 131-136
30. Abruzzi K.C., et al. Protection from free beta-tubulin by the beta-tubulin binding protein Rbl2p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 (2002) 138-147
31. Katz W., et al. Regulation of tubulin levels and microtubule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: consequences of altered tubulin gene copy number. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10 (1990) 5286-5294
32. Gunjan A., et al. 53 kinase-dependent surveillance mechanism that regulates histone protein levels in S. cerevisiae. Cell 115 (2003) 537-549
33. Gunjan A., et al. The emergence of regulated histone proteolysis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16 (2006) 112-118
34. Li B., et al. An RNA structure involved in feedback regulation of splicing and of translation is critical for biological fitness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93 (1996) 1596-1600
35. Chen K.C., et al. Integrative analysis of cell cycle control in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 15 (2004) 3841-3862
36. Guo M., and Birchler J.A. Trans-acting dosage effects on the expression of model gene systems in maize aneuploids. Science 266 (1994) 1999-2002
37. Birchler J.A., and Veitia R.A. The gene balance hypothesis: From classical genetics to modern genomics. Plant Cell 19 (2007) 395-402
38. Birchler J.A. A study of enzyme activities in a dosage series of the long arm of chromosome one in maize. Genetics 92 (1979) 1211-1229
39. Birchler J.A., and Newton K.J. Modulation of protein levels in chromosomal dosage series of maize: The biochemical basis of aneuploid syndromes. Genetics 99 (1981) 247-266
40. Sabl J.F., and Birchler J.A. Dosage dependent modifiers of white alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 62 (1993) 15-22
41. Birchler J.A. Expression of cis-regulatory mutants of the white locus in metafemales of Drosophila melanogaster. Gen. Res. 59 (1992) 11-18
42. Rabinow L., et al. A trans-acting regulatory gene that inversely affects the expression of the white, brown and scarlet loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 129 (1991) 463-480
43. Schulze S.R., and Wallrath L.L. Gene regulation by chromatin structure: Paradigms established in Drosophila melanogaster. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52 (2007) 171-192
44. Aït Yahya-Graison E., et al. Classification of human chromosome 21 gene-expression variations in Down Syndrome: Impact on disease phenotypes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81 (2007) 475-491
45. Lyle R., et al. Gene expression from the aneuploid chromosome in a trisomy mouse model of down syndrome. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 1268-1274
46. Kahlem P., et al. Transcript level alterations reflect gene dosage effects across multiple tissues in a mouse model of down syndrome. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 1258-1267
47. Altug-Teber O., et al. Specific transcriptional changes in human fetuses with autosomal trisomies. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 119 (2007) 171-184
48. Birchler J.A., et al. Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. Trends Genet. 21 (2005) 219-226
49. Lee J.M., and Sonnhammer E.L. Genomic gene clustering analysis of pathways in eukaryotes. Genome Res. 13 (2003) 875-882
50. Teichmann S.A., and Veitia R.A. Genes encoding subunits of stable complexes are clustered on the yeast chromosomes: an interpretation from a dosage balance perspective. Genetics 167 (2004) 2121-2125
51. Nguyen D.K., and Disteche C.M. Dosage compensation of the active X chromosome in mammals. Nat. Genet. 38 (2006) 47-53
52. Lin H., et al. Dosage compensation in the mouse balances up-regulation and silencing of X-linked genes. PLoS Biol. 5 (2007) e326
53. Gupta V., et al. Global analysis of X-chromosome dosage compensation. J. Biol. 5 (2006) 3
54. Parisi M., et al. Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science 299 (2003) 697-700
55. Birchler J.A., et al. Commonalities in compensation. Bioessays 28 (2006) 565-568
56. Straub T., and Becker P.B. Dosage compensation: the beginning and end of generalization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8 (2007) 47-57
57. Asher G., et al. 20S proteasomes and protein degradation 'by default'. Bioessays 28 (2006) 844-849
58. Buchler N.E., et al. Nonlinear protein degradation and the function of genetic circuits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 9559-9564
59. Tompa P., et al. Structural disorder serves as a weak signal for intracellular protein degradation. Proteins 71 (2008) 903-909
60. Hegyi H., et al. Structural disorder promotes assembly of protein complexes. BMC Struct. Biol. 7 (2007) 65
61. Hill W.G., et al. Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits. PLoS Genet. 4 (2008) e1000008