Genome annotation in plants and fungi: EuGène as a model platform

Current Bioinformatics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 87-97

  Foissac, Sylvain ^a,b   Gouzy, Jérôme ^c   Rombauts, Stephane ^d,e   Mathé, Catherine ^b   Amselem, Joëlle ^f,g   Sterck, Lieven ^d,e   Van De Peer, Yves ^d,e   Rouzé, Pierre ^e   Schiex, Thomas ^h  

^a CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^b Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^c LABORATOIRE DES INTERACTIONS PLANTES MICROORGANISMES LIPM   (France)

^d DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^e GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^f Centre de recherche de Versailles   (France)

^g INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^h CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Fungi; Gene finding; Genome annotation; Plants

Indexed keywords

EID: 66249109710     PISSN: 15748936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157489308784340702     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Burge C, Karlin S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol 1997; 268: 78-94.
2. Rabiner L. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 1989; 77: 257-286.
3. Korf I, Flicek P, Duan D, Brent MR. Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction. Bioinformatics 2001; 17 Suppl 1: p. S140-148.
4. Brown RH, Gross SS, Brent MR. Begin at the beginning: predicting genes with 5' UTRs. Genome Res 2005; 15: 742-747.
5. Decaprio D, Vinson JP, Pearson MD, Montgomery P, Doherty M, Galagan JE. Conrad: gene prediction using conditional random fields. Genome Res 2007; 17(9): 1389-1398.
6. Allen JE, Salzberg SL. Jigsaw: integration of multiple sources of evidence for gene prediction. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 3596-3603.
7. Schiex T, Moisan A, Rouzé P. EuGène: an eucaryotic gene finder that combines several sources of evidence. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2001; 2066: 111-125.
8. Borodovsky M, McIninch JD, Koonin EV, Rudd KE, Médigue C, Danchin A. Detection of new genes in a bacterial genome using markov models for three gene classes. Nucleic Acids Res 1995; 23: 3554-3562.
9. Zhang MQ, Marr TG. A weight array method for splicing signal analysis. Comput Appl Biosci 1993; 9: 499-509.
10. Degroeve S, Saeys Y, De Baets B, Rouzé P, Van De Peer Y. Splicemachine: predicting splice sites from high-dimensional local context representations. Bioinformatics 2005, 21: 1332-1338.
11. Schlueter SD, Dong Q, Brendel V. Geneseqer at plantgdb: gene structure prediction in plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3597-3600.
12. Gremme G, Brendel V, Sparks M, Kurtz S. Engineering a software tool for gene structure prediction in higher organisms. Inf Softw Technol 2005; 47: 965-978.
13. Yeh RF, Lim LP, Burge CB. Computational inference of homologous gene structures in the human genome. Genome Res 2001; 11: 803-816.
14. Gross SS, Brent MR. Using multiple alignments to improve gene prediction. J Comput Biol 2006 13: 379-393.
15. Alexandersson M, Cawley S, Pachter L. Slam: cross-species gene finding and alignment with a generalized pair hidden Markov model. Genome Res 2003; 13: 496-502.
16. th Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2005; 17: 1185-1192 [http//books.nips.cc/nips17.-html]
17. Bellman R, Kalaba R. Dynamic programming and modern control theory. Acadamic Press London 1965.
18. Stanke M, Steinkamp R, Waack S, Morgenstern B. Augustus: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: W309-12.
19. Moskal WAJ, Wu HC, Underwood BA, Wang W, Town CD, Xiao Y. Experimental validation of novel genes predicted in the un-annotated regions of the arabidopsis genome. BMC Genomics 2007; 8: 18.
20. Aubourg S, Martin-Vigniette ML, Brunaud V, et al. Analysis of CATMA transcriptome data identifies hundreds of novel functional genes and improves gene models in the Arabidopsis genome. BMC Genomics 2007; 8: 401.
21. Foissac S, Bardou P, Moisan A, Cros M, Schiex T. EuGene'Hom: a generic similarity-based gene finder using multiple homologous sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3742-3745.
22. Foissac S, Schiex T. Integrating alternative splicing detection into gene prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6: 25.
23. Birney E. Ensembl: a genome infrastructure. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2003; 68: 213-215.
24. Howe KL, Chothia T, Durbin R. Gaze: a generic framework for the integration of gene-prediction data by dynamic programming. Genome Res 2002; 12: 1418-1427.
25. Stanke M, Schöffmann O, Morgenstern B, Waack S. Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7: 62.
26. Majoros WH, Salzberg SL. An empirical analysis of training protocols for probabilistic gene finders. BMC Bioinformatics 2004; 5: 206.
27. Allen JE, Majoros WH, Pertea M, Salzberg SL. Jigsaw, Genezilla, and GlimmerHMM: puzzling out the features of human genes in the encode regions. Genome Biol 2006; 7 Suppl 1: S9.1-13.
28. Stanke M, Tzvetkova A, Morgenstern B. Augustus at EGasp: using EST, protein and genomic alignments for improved gene prediction in the human genome. Genome Biol 2006; 7 Suppl 1: S11-18.
29. Wang X, Shi X, Li Z, Zhu Q, Kong L, Tang W, Ge S, Luo J. Statistical inference of chromosomal homology based on gene colinear-ity and applications to Arabidopsis and rice. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7: 447.
30. Pedersen AG, Nielsen H. Neural network prediction of translation initiation sites in eukaryotes: perspectives for EST and genome analysis. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 1997; 5: 226-233.
31. Hebsgaard SM, Korning PG, Tolstrup N, et al. Splice site prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana pre-mRNA by combining local and global sequence information. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24: 3439-3452.
32. Kleffe J, Hermann K, Vahrson W, Wittig B, Brendel V. Logitlinear models for the prediction of splice sites in plant pre-mRNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24: 4709-4718.
33. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. Improved microbial gene identification with Glimmer. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27: 4636-4641.
34. Pavy N, Rombauts S, Déhais P, et al. Evaluation of gene prediction software using a genomic data set: application to Arabidopsis thaliana sequences. Bioinformatics 1999; 15: 887-899.
35. Korning PG, Hebsgaard SM, Rouzé P, Brunak S. Cleaning the Genbank Arabidopsis thaliana data set. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24: 316-320.
36. Florea L, Hartzell G, Zhang Z, Rubin GM, Miller W. A computer program for aligning a cDNA sequence with a genomic DNA sequence. Genome Res 1998; 8: 967-974.
37. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25: 3389-3402.
38. Crowe ML, Serizet C, Thareau V, et al. CATMA: a complete Arabidopsis GST database. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 156-158.
39. Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P. RepeatMasker Open-3.0. 1996-2004 http://www.repeatmasker.org (accessed on Jan. 2008).
40. Seki M, Narusaka M, Kamiya A, et al. Functional annotation of a full-length Arabidopsis cDNA collection. Science 2002; 296: 141-145.
41. Journet E, van Tuinen D, Gouzy J, et al. Exploring root symbiotic programs in the model legume Medicago truncatula using EST analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30: 5579-5592.
42. Small I, Peeters N, Legeai F, Lurin C. Predotar: a tool for rapidly screening proteomes for n-terminal targeting sequences. Pro-teomics 2004; 4: 1581-1590.
43. Fillinger S, Amselem J, Artiguenave F, et al. The genome projects of the plant pathogenic fungi Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia scle-rotiorum. In: Jeandet P, Clément C, Conreux A Eds, Macromolecules and Secondary Metabolties of Grapevine and Wine. Technique & Documentation, Paris, 2007; 125-133.
44. Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, et al. The genome of black cot-tonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 2006; 313: 1596-1604.
45. Derelle E, Ferraz C, Rombauts S, et al. Genome analysis of the smallest free-living eukaryote ostreococcus tauri unveils many unique features. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 11647-11652.
46. Palenik B, Grimwood J, Aerts A, et al. The tiny eukaryote ostreo-coccus provides genomic insights into the paradox of plankton spe-ciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 7705-7710.
47. Lomsadze A, Ter-Hovhannisyan V, Chernoff YO, Borodovsky M. Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: 6494-6506.
48. Haas BJ, Delcher AL, Mount SM, et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 5654-5666.