New starch phenotypes produced by TILLING in barley

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Sparla, Francesca ^a   Falini, Giuseppe ^a   Botticella, Ermelinda ^b   Pirone, Claudia ^a   Talamè, Valentina ^a   Bovina, Riccardo ^a   Salvi, Silvio ^a   Tuberosa, Roberto ^a   Sestili, Francesco ^b   Trost, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYLOPECTIN; AMYLOSE; BETA AMYLASE; OLIGO 1,6 GLUCOSIDASE; STARCH; STARCH SYNTHASE; STARCH SYNTHASE II; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BARLEY; BMY1 GENE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GBSSI GENE; GENE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; LDA1 GENE; MISSENSE MUTATION; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NONSENSE MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PLANT GENOME; SSI GENE; SSIIA GENE; TARGETING INDUCED LOCAL LESION IN GENOME; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HORDEUM; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PLANT SEED; PROCEDURES;

HORDEUM;

AMYLOSE; GENOMICS; HORDEUM; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT PROTEINS; SEEDS; STARCH; STARCH SYNTHASE;

EID: 84907482204     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107779     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Collins HM, Burton RA, Topping D.L., Liao M-L, Bacic A, et al (2010) Variability in fine structures of noncellulosic cell wall polysaccharides from cereal grains: potential importance in human health and nutrition. Cereal Chem 87: 272-282.
2. The International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium (2012) A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. Nature 491: 711-716.
3. Buléon A., Colonna P, Planchot V., Ball S. (1998) Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol 23: 85-112.
4. Ball SG, Morell M.K. (2003) From bacterial glycogen to starch: understanding the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54: 207-233.
5. James MG, Denyer K, Myers A. (2003) Starch synthesis in the cereal endosperm. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 215-222.
6. Jobling S (2004) Improving starch for food and industrial applications. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7: 210-218.
7. Morell MK, Myers A.M. (2005) Towards the rational design of cereal starches. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8: 204-210.
8. Jeon JS, Ryoo N, Hahn T.R., Walia H., Nakamura Y. (2010) Starch biosynthesis in cereal endosperm. Plant Physiol Bioch 48: 383-392.
9. Zeeman SC, Kossmann J, Smith A.M. (2010) Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61: 209-234.
10. Mazanec K, Dycka F, Bobalova J. (2011) Monitoring of barley starch amylolysis by gravitational field flow fractionation and MALDI-TOF MS. J Sci Food Agric 91: 2756-2761.
11. Howard T, Rejab NA, Griffiths S, Leigh F., Leverington-Waite M, et al. (2011) Identification of a major QTL controlling the content of B-type starch granules in Aegilops. J Exp Bot 62: 2217-2228.
12. Slade AJ, Fuerstenberg SI, Loeffler D, Steine M.N., Facciotti D. (2005) A reverse genetic, nontransgenic approach to wheat crop improvement by TILLING. Nat Biotechnol 23: 75-81.
13. Bird AR, Vuaran MS, King R.A., Noakes M., Keogh J, et al. (2008) Wholegrain foods made from a novel high-amylose barley variety (Himalaya 292) improve indices of bowel health in human subjects. Brit J Nutr 99: 1032-1040.
14. Damiran D, Yu P. (2010) Chemical profile, rumen degradation kinetics, and energy value of four hull-less barley cultivars: comparison of the zero-amylose waxy, waxy, high-amylose, and normal starch cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 58: 10553-10559.
15. Morel MK, Kosar-Hashemi B, Cmiel M., Samuel MS, Chandler P, et al. (2003) Barley sex6 mutants lack starch synthase IIa activity and contain a starch with novel properties. Plant J 34: 173-185.
16. Li Z, Li D, Du X., Wang H, Larroque O, et al (2011) The barley amo1 locus is tightly linked to the starch synthase IIIa gene and negatively regulates expression of granule-bound starch synthase genes. J Exp Bot 62: 5217-5231.
17. Asare EK, Jaiswal S, Maley J., Båga M, Sammynaiken R., et al. (2011) Barley grain constituents, starch composition, and structure affect starch in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis. J Agric Food Chem 59: 4743-4754.
18. Nugent AP (2005) Health properties of resistant starch. Nutrition Bulletin 30: 27-54.
19. Topping D (2007) Cereal complex carbohydrates and their contribution to human health. Trends Food Sci Technol 46: 220-229.
20. Dhital S, Shrestha AK, Hasjim J, Gidley M.J. (2011) Physicochemical and structural properties of maize and potato starches as a function of granule size. J Agric Food Chem 59: 10151-10161.
21. MacGregor AW (1991) The effect of barley structure and composition on malt duality, in Proceedings of the European Brewery Convention Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 37-42.
22. Bovina R, Talamè V, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC, Trost P, et al. (2011) Starch metabolism mutants in barley: a TILLING approach Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 9: 170-173.
23. Talamè V, Bovina R, Sanguineti MC, Tuberosa R, Lundqvist U, et al. (2008) TILLMore, a resource for the discovery of chemically induced mutants in barley. Plant Biotechnol J 6: 477-485.
24. Kim K, Johnson W, Graybosch R.A., Gaines C.S. (2003) Physicochemical properties and end-use quality of wheat starch as a function of waxy protein alleles. J Cereal Sci 37: 195-204.
25. Zhao XC, Sharp P.J. (1996) An improved 1-D SDS-PAGE method for the identification of three bread wheat waxy proteins. J Cereal Sci 23: 191-193.
26. Mohammadkhani A, Stoddard FL, Marshall D.R., Uddin MN, Zhao X. (1999) Starch extraction and amylose analysis from half seeds. Starch/Stärke 51: 62-66.
27. Sestili F, Janni M, Doherty A., Botticella E, D'Ovidio R, et al. (2010) Increasing the amylose content of durum wheat through silencing of the SBEIIa genes. BMC Plant Biol 10: 144.
28. Nara S, Komiya T. (1983) Studies on the relationship between water-saturation state and crystallinity by the diffraction method for moistened potato starch. Starch/Stä rke 35: 407-410.
29. Asare EK, Baga M, Rossnagel B.G., Chibbar R.N. (2012) Polymorphism in the barley granule bound starch synthase 1 (gbss1) gene associated with grain starch variant amylose concentration. J Agric Food Chem 60: 10082-10092.
30. Radchuk VV, Borisjuk L, Sreenivasulu N., Merx K, Mock HP, et al (2009) Spatiotemporal profiling of starch biosynthesis and degradation in the developing barley grain. Plant Physiol 150: 190-204.
31. Sestili F, Botticella E, Bedo Z., Phillips A, Lafiandra D. (2010) Production of novel allelic variation for genes involved in starch biosynthesis through mutagenesis. Molecular Breeding 25: 145-154.
32. Vriet C, Welham T, Brachmann A., Pike M, Pike J, et al (2010) A suite of Lotus japonicus starch mutants reveals both conserved and novel features of starch metabolism. Plant Physiol 154: 643-655.
33. Botticella E, Sestili F, Hernandez-Lopez A, Phillips A., Lafiandra D. High resolution melting analysis for the detection of EMS induced mutations in wheat SBEIIa genes. BMC Plant Biol. 10: 156.
34. Hazard B, Zhang X, Colasuonno P., Uauy C, Beckles DM, et al (2012) Induced mutations in the starch branching enzyme II (SBEII) genes increase amylose and resistant starch content in pasta wheat. Crop Sci 52: 1754-1766.
35. Slade AJ, McGuire C, Loeffler D., Mullenberg J, Skinner W, et al (2012) Development of high amylose wheat through TILLING. BMC Plant Biol 12: 69.
36. Bovina R, Brunazzi A, Gasparini G., Sestili F, Palombieri S, et al (2014) Development of a TILLING resource in durum wheat for reverse- and forward-genetics analyses. Crop & Pasture Science 65: 112-124.
37. Nelson OE, Rines H.W. (1962) The enzymatic deficiency in the waxy mutant of maize. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 9: 297-300.
38. Maddelein ML, Libessart N, Bellanger F., Delrue B, D'Hulst C, et al. (1994) Toward an understanding of the biogenesis of the starch granule: determination of granule-bound and soluble starch synthase functions in amylopectin synthesis. J Biol Chem 269: 25150-25157.
39. Denyer K, Waite D, Edwards A., Martin C, Smith A.M. (1999) Interaction with amylopectin influences the ability of granule-bound starch synthase I to elongate malto-oligosaccharides. Biochem J 342: 647-653.
40. Yoo SH, Jane J-L (2002) Structural and physical characteristics of waxy and other wheat starches. Carbohydr Polym 49: 297-305.
41. Baik BK, Ullrich S.E. (2008) Barley for food: characteristics, improvement and renewed interest. J Cereal Sci 48: 233-242.
42. Howard TP, Fahy B, Leigh F., Howell P, Powell W, et al (2014) Use of advanced recombinant lines to study the impact and potential of mutations affecting starch synthesis in barley. J Cereal Sci 59: 196-202.
43. Waduge R, Hoover R, Vasanthan T., Gao J, Li J. (2006) Effect of annealing on the structure and physicochemical properties of barley starches of varying amylose content. Food Res Int 39: 59-77.
44. Naguleswaran S, Vasanthan T, Hoover R., Bressler D. (2013) The susceptibility of large and small granules of waxy, normal and high-amylose genotypes of barley and corn starches toward amylolysis at sub-gelatinization temperatures. Food Res Int 51: 771-782.
45. Momma M, Fujimoto Z. (2012) Interdomain disulfide bridge in the rice granule bound starch synthase I catalytic domain as elucidated by X-ray structure analysis. Biosci Biotech Bioch 76: 1591-1595.
46. Patron NJ, Smith AM, Fahy B.F., Hylton CM, Naldrett MJ, et al. (2002) The altered pattern of amylose accumulation in the endosperm of low-amylose barley cultivars is attributable to a single mutant allele of granule-bound starch synthase I with a deletion in the 5'-non-coding region. Plant Physiol 130: 190-198.
47. Burton RA, Jenner H, Carrangis L., Fahy B, Fincher GB, et al (2002) Starch granule initiation and growth are altered in barley mutants that lack isoamylase activity. Plant J 31: 97-112.
48. Fujita N, Toyosawa Y, Utsumi Y., Higuchi T, Hanashiro I, et al (2009) Characterization of pullulanase (PUL)-deficient mutants of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and the function of PUL on starch biosynthesis in the developing rice endosperm. J Exp Bot 60: 1009-1023.
49. Huang Y, Cai S, Ye L., Han Y, Wu D, et al (2014) Genetic architecture of limit dextrinase inhibitor (LDI) activity in Tibetan wild barley. BMC Plant Biol 14: 117.
50. Stahl Y, Coates S, Bryce J.H., Morris P.C. (2004) Antisense downregulation of the barley limit dextrinase inhibitor modulates starch granule size distribution, starch composition and amylopectin structure. Plant J 39: 599-611.
51. Vester-Christensen M.B., Abou Hachem M, Svensson B, Henriksen A. (2010) Crystal structure of an essential enzyme in seed starch degradation: barley limit dextrinase in complex with cyclodextrins. J Mol Biol 403: 739-750.
52. Roldán I., Wattebled F, Mercedes Lucas M, Delvallé D, Planchot V, et al. (2007) The phenotype of soluble starch synthase IV defective mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests a novel function of elongation enzymes in the control of starch granule formation. Plant J 49: 492-504.
53. Fujita N, Yoshida M, Asakura N., Ohdan T, Miyao A, et al (2006) Function and characterization of starch synthase I using mutants in rice. Plant Physiol 140: 1070-1084.
54. McMaugh SJ, Thistleton JL, Anschaw E, Luo J., Konik-Rose C, et al. (2014) Suppression of starch synthase I expression affects the granule morphology and granule size and fine structure of starch in wheat endosperm. J Exp Bot 65: 2189-2201.
55. Cuesta-Seijo J.A., Nielsen MM, Marri L, Tanaka H., Beeren SR, et al. (2013) Structure of starch synthase I from barley: insight into regulatory mechanisms of starch synthase activity. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69: 1013-1025.
56. Jane J-L, Kasemsuwa T., Leas S, Ames IA, Zobel H, et al (1994) Anthology of starch granule morphology by scanning electron microscopy. Starch 46: 121-129.
57. Yamamori M, Fujita S, Hayakawa K., Matsuki J, Yasui T. (2000) Genetic elimination of a starch granule protein, SGP-1, of wheat generates an altered starch with apparent high amylose. Theor Appl Genet 101: 21-29.
58. Lafiandra D, Sestili F, D'Ovidio R, Janni M, Botticella E., et al. (2010) Approaches for the modification of starch composition in durum wheat. Cereal chem 87: 28-34.