Chemical profile, rumen degradation kinetics, and energy value of four hull-less barley cultivars: comparison of the zero-amylose waxy, waxy, high-amylose, and normal starch cultivars

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Volumn 58, Issue 19, 2010, Pages 10553-10559

  Damiran, Daalkhaijav ^a   Yu, Peiqiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hull less barley; In situ; Protein and energy evaluation; Ruminants; Starch structure

Indexed keywords

BASIC CHEMICALS; CHEMICAL PROFILES; DEGRADABILITY; DEGRADATION KINETICS; DEGRADATION RATE; ENERGY VALUE; HULL-LESS BARLEY; IN-SITU; MODIFIED STARCHES; RUMINANT FEEDS; RUMINANTS; SOLUBLE STARCH; STARCH DEGRADATION; STARCH STRUCTURE;

AMYLOPECTINS; CARBOHYDRATES; CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION; MAMMALS; PROTEINS;

DEGRADATION;

AMYLOPECTIN; AMYLOSE; CARBOHYDRATE; STARCH; VEGETABLE PROTEIN; WAX;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BARLEY; CALORIC INTAKE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PLANT SEED; RUMINANT STOMACH; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AMYLOPECTIN; AMYLOSE; ANIMALS; CARBOHYDRATES; CATTLE; ENERGY INTAKE; HORDEUM; KINETICS; PLANT PROTEINS; RUMEN; SEEDS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STARCH; WAXES;

BOVIDAE; CALAMUS ROTANG; HORDEUM;

EID: 78049250017     PISSN: 00218561     EISSN: 15205118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jf101624a     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Wang, J. Malting barley: situation and outlook. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Publications. Bi-weekly Bull. AAFC 2081/E 2005, 18 (4), 81-82.
2. FAOSTAT. Production and trade, available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/ 339/default.aspx, accessed June 28, 2010.
3. Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). Online at http://www. inspection.gc.ca; CDC Fibar: Registration Number 5649; CDC Rattan: Registration Number 5712; accessed Feb 12, 2009.
4. Ullrich, S. E.; Clancy, J. A.; Eslick, R. F.; Lance, R. β-Glucan content and viscosity of the extract from barley. J. Cereal Sci. 1986, 4, 279-285.
5. Hesselman, K.; Thomke, S. Influence of some factors on development of viscosity in the water-extract of barley. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 1982, 12, 17-22.
6. Camm, G. A. Grain hardness and slow dry matter disappearance rate in barley. M.S. thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2008.
7. Izydorczyk, M. S.; Dexter, J. E. Barley β-glucans and arabinoxylans: molecular structure, physicochemical properties, and uses in food products - a review. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 850-868.
8. Zobel, H. F. Molecules to granules: A comprehensive starch review. Starch/Staerke 1988, 40, 44-50.
9. Takeda, Y.; Tomooka, S.; Hizukuri, S. Structures of branched and linear molecules of rice amylose. Carbohydr. Res. 1993, 246, 267-272.
10. Bhatty, R. S. The potential of hull-less barley - a review. Cereal Chem. 1999, 76 (5), 589-599.
11. Yang, W. Z.; Beauchemin, K. A.; Farr, B. I.; Rode, L. M. Comparison of barley, hull-less barley, and corn in the concentrate of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80, 2885-2895.
12. Edney, M.; Tkachuk, R.; MacGregor, A. W. Nutrient composition of hull-less barley cultivar, Condor. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1992, 60, 451-456.
13. Ovenell-Roy, K. H.; Nelson, M. L.; Froseth, J. A.; Parish, S. M.; Martin, E. L. Variation in chemical composition and nutritional quality among barley cultivars for ruminants: steer finishing performance, diet digestibilities and carcass characteristics. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 78, 369-375.
14. Ramsey, P. B.; Mathison, G. W.; Goonewardene, L. A. Relationships between ruminal dry matter and starch disappearance and apparent digestibility of barley grain. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2001, 94, 155-170.
15. Zinn, R. A.;Montano,M.; Shen, Y. Comparative feeding value of hullless vs covered barley for feedlot cattle. J.Anim. Sci. 1996, 74, 1187-1193.
16. Rossnagel, B. G.; Zatorski, T.; Arganosa, G. Food barley development at the Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan. Proceedings of the 18th North American Barley Research Workshop and 4th Canadian Barley Symposium, Red Deer, AB, Canada, July 17-20, 2005.
17. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington,VA, 1990.
18. Van Soest, P. J.; Robertson, J. B.; Lewis, B. A. Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583-3597.
19. Smith, D. Removing and Analyzing Carbohydrates from Plant Tissue, Report R2017; Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station: Madison, WI, 1981.
20. NRC, National Research Council. Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle, 7th ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
21. CNCPS. A manual for using the Cornel Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for evaluating cattle diets. Review CNCPS Release 3; Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, 1994.
22. Sniffen, C. J.; O'Connor, J. D.; Van Soest, P. J.; Fox, D. G.; Russell, J. B. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 70, 3562-3577.
23. Krishnamoorthy, U. C.; Muscato, C. J.; Sniffen, C. J.; Van Soest, P. J. Nitrogen fractions in selected feedstuffs. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65, 217-225.
24. Doiron, K. J.; Yu, P.; McKinnon, J. J.; Christensen, D. A. Heat induced protein structures and protein subfractions in relation to protein degradation kinetics and intestinal availability in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 3319-3330.
25. NRC, National Research Council. Nutrient Requirement of Beef Cattle, 7th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 1996.
26. Ørskov, E. R.; McDonald, I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to the rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 1979, 92, 499-503.
27. Yu, P.; Meier, J. A.; Christensen,D.A.; Rossnagel, B. G.;McKinnon, J. J.Using theNRC-2001model and theDVE/OEB systemto evaluate nutritive values of Harrington (malting-type) and Valier (feed-type) barley for ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2003, 107, 45-60.
28. Canadian Council on Animal Care. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, 2nd ed.; Canadian Council on Animal Care: Ottawa, Canada, 1993; Vol.1.
29. Yu, P.; Goelema, J. O.; Tamminga, S. Using the DVE/OEB model to determine optimal conditions of pressure toasting on horse beans (Vicia faba) for the dairy feed industry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2000, 86, 165-176.
30. Urdl, M.; Gruber, L.; Hausler, J.; Maierhofer, G.; Schauer, A. Influence of distillers dried grains with solubles (Starprot) in dairy cow feeding. Slovak J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 39, 43-50.
31. Tamminga, S.; Van Straalen, W. M.; Subnel, A. P. J.; Meijer, R. G. M.; Steg, A.; Wever, C. J. G.; Block,M. C. The Dutch protein evaluation system: The DVE/OEB-system. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1994, 40, 139-155.
32. Statistical Analysis System Institute. SAS/STAT User's Guide, version 9.1.3; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, 2003.
33. Foley, A. E.; Hristov, A. N.; Melgar, A.; Ropp, J. K.; Etter, R. P.; Zaman, S.; Hunt, C. W. Effect of barley and its amylopectin content on ruminal fermentation and nitrogen utilization in lactation dairy cows. J. Anim Sci. 2006, 89, 4321-4335.
34. Tang, H.; Watanabe, K.; Mitsunaga, T. Structural and functionality of large, medium and small granule starches in normal and waxy barley endosperm. Carbohydr. Polym. 2002, 49, 217-224.
35. McAllister, T. A.; Phillippe, R. C.; Rode, L. M.; Cheng, K. J. Effects of the protein matrix on the digestion of cereal grains by ruminal microorganisms. J. Anim Sci. 1993, 71, 205-212.
36. Yu, P.; Christensen, D. A.; Christensen, C. R.; Drew, M. D.; Rossnagel, B. G.; McKinnon, J. J. Use of synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy to identify chemical differences in barley endosperm tissue in relation to rumen degradation characteristics. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 84, 523-527.
37. Bhatty, R. S. β-Glucan content and viscosities of barleys and their roller milled flour and bran products. Cereal Chem. 1992, 69, 469-471.
38. Surber, L. M.; Bowman, J. G.; Blake, T. K.; Hinman, D. D.; Boss, D. L.; Blackhurst, T. C. Prediction of barley feed quality for beef cattle from laboratory analyses. Proc. West. Sect. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 2000, 51, 454-457.
39. Zheng, G. H.; Rossnagel, B. G.; Tyler, R. T.; Bhatty, R. S. Distribution of β-glucan in the grain of hull-less barley. Cereal Chem. 2000, 77 (2), 140-144.
40. Owens, F. N.; Zinn, R. A.; Kim, Y. K. Limits to starch digestion in the ruminant small intestine. J. Anim. Sci. 1986, 63, 1634-1648.
41. Walker, A. M.; Yu, P.; Christensen, C. R.; Christensen, D. A.; McKinnon, J. J. Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopic analysis of the effects of cereal type and variety within a type of grain on structural make-up in the relation to rumen degradation kinetics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6871-6878.