Nucleosomal occupancy changes locally over key regulatory regions during cell differentiation and reprogramming

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  West, Jason A ^a,b   Cook, April ^a,b   Alver, Burak H ^c   Stadtfeld, Matthias ^d   Deaton, Aimee M ^a,b   Hochedlinger, Konrad ^e,f   Park, Peter J ^c   Tolstorukov, Michael Y ^a   Kingston, Robert E ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Harvard Medical School Center for Biomedical Informatics   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^f Harvard University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; CHROMATIN; NUCLEOSOME; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

BIOINFORMATICS; DNA; EMBRYO; GENE EXPRESSION; PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL POPULATION; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; NUCLEOSOME; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN MOTIF; SOMATIC CELL; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CHROMATIN; ENHANCER REGION; GENETICS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; CHROMATIN; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MICE; NUCLEOSOMES; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

EID: 84907312810     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5719     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Gao, X. et al. ES cell pluripotency and germ-layer formation require the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling component BAF250a. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6656-6661 (2008). (Pubitemid 351754562)
2. Ho, L. et al. An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5181-5186 (2009).
3. Loh, Y. H., Zhang, W., Chen, X., George, J. & Ng, H. H. Jmjd1a and Jmjd2c histone H3 Lys 9 demethylases regulate self-renewal in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 21, 2545-2557 (2007). (Pubitemid 47607666)
4. Meshorer, E. et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev. Cell 10, 105-116 (2006). (Pubitemid 43025681)
5. Fussner, E. et al. Constitutive heterochromatin reorganization during somatic cell reprogramming. EMBO J. 30, 1778-1789 (2011).
6. Gaspar-Maia, A., Alajem, A., Meshorer, E. & Ramalho-Santos, M. Open chromatin in pluripotency and reprogramming. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 36-47 (2011).
7. Wang, J. et al. A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 444, 364-368 (2006). (Pubitemid 44764111)
8. Yildirim, O. et al. Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 147, 1498-1510 (2011).
9. Sansam, C. G. & Roberts, C. W. Epigenetics and cancer: altered chromatin remodeling via Snf5 loss leads to aberrant cell cycle regulation. Cell Cycle 5, 621-624 (2006).
10. Reisman, D., Glaros, S. & Thompson, E. A. The SWI/SNF complex and cancer. Oncogene 28, 1653-1668 (2009).
11. Kornberg, R. D. Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 184, 868-871 (1974).
12. Luger, K., Mader, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F. & Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2. 8A resolution. Nature 389, 251-260 (1997). (Pubitemid 27406632)
13. Li, B., Carey, M. & Workman, J. L. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 128, 707-719 (2007). (Pubitemid 46273570)
14. Morse, R. H. Transcription factor access to promoter elements. J. Cell. Biochem. 102, 560-570 (2007). (Pubitemid 47557411)
15. Dennis, J. H. et al. Independent and complementary methods for large-scale structural analysis of mammalian chromatin. Genome Res. 17, 928-939 (2007). (Pubitemid 46919727)
16. Li, Z., Schug, J., Tuteja, G., White, P. & Kaestner, K. H. The nucleosome map of the mammalian liver. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 742-746 (2011).
17. Schones, D. E. et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132, 887-898 (2008). (Pubitemid 351312809)
18. Teif, V. B. et al. Genome-wide nucleosome positioning during embryonic stem cell development. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1185-1192 (2012).
19. Valouev, A. et al. Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature 474, 516-520 (2011).
20. Woo, C. J., Kharchenko, P. V., Daheron, L., Park, P. J. & Kingston, R. E. A Region of the Human HOXD Cluster that Confers Polycomb-Group Responsiveness. Cell 140, 99-110 (2010).
21. Li, Z. et al. Foxa2 and H2A. Z mediate nucleosome depletion during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cell 151, 1608-1616 (2012).
22. Tolstorukov, M. Y. et al. Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling/tumor suppressor complex establishes nucleosome occupancy at target promoters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10165-10170 (2013).
23. Weiner, A., Hughes, A., Yassour, M., Rando, O. J. & Friedman, N. High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging. Genome Res. 20, 90-100 (2010).
24. Henikoff, S., Henikoff, J. G., Sakai, A., Loeb, G. B. & Ahmad, K. Genome-wide profiling of salt fractions maps physical properties of chromatin. Genome Res. 19, 460-469 (2009).
25. Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Borkent, M. & Hochedlinger, K. A reprogrammable mouse strain from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells. Nat. Methods 7, 53-55 (2010).
26. Yuan, G. et al. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309, 626-630 (2005). (Pubitemid 41033649)
27. Segal, E. et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442, 772-778 (2006). (Pubitemid 44258903)
28. Kharchenko, P. V., Woo, C. J., Tolstorukov, M. Y., Kingston, R. E. & Park, P. J. Nucleosome positioning in human HOX gene clusters. Genome Res. 18, 1554-1561 (2008).
29. Tolstorukov, M. Y. et al. Histone variant H2A. Bbd is associated with active transcription and mRNA processing in human cells. Mol. Cell. 47, 596-607 (2012).
30. Henikoff, J. G., Belsky, J. A., Krassovsky, K., MacAlpine, D. M. & Henikoff, S. Epigenome characterization at single base-pair resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18318-18323 (2011).
31. Koerber, R. T., Rhee, H. S., Jiang, C. & Pugh, B. F. Interaction of transcriptional regulators with specific nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces genome. Mol. Cell. 35, 889-902 (2009).
32. Gaffney, D. J. et al. Controls of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003036 (2012).
33. Chung, H. R. et al. The effect of micrococcal nuclease digestion on nucleosome positioning data. PLoS ONE 5, e15754 (2010).
34. Johnson, W. E. et al. Model-based analysis of tiling-arrays for ChIP-chip. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12457-12462 (2006).
35. Cheung, M. S., Down, T. A., Latorre, I. & Ahringer, J. Systematic bias in high-throughput sequencing data and its correction by BEADS. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e103 (2011).
36. Benjamini, Y. & Speed, T. P. Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e72 (2012).
37. Kornberg, R. D. & Lorch, Y. Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell 98, 285-294 (1999). (Pubitemid 29380564)
38. Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315-326 (2006).
39. Deaton, A. M. & Bird, A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 25, 1010-1022 (2011).
40. Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish superenhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307-319 (2013).
41. Hnisz, D. et al. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934-947 (2013).
42. Chen, K. et al. DANPOS: dynamic analysis of nucleosome position and occupancy by sequencing. Genome Res. 23, 341-351 (2013).
43. Bilic, J. & Izpisua Belmonte, J. C. Concise review: induced pluripotent stem cells versus embryonic stem cells: close enough or yet too far apart? Stem Cells 30, 33-41 (2012).
44. Papp, B. & Plath, K. Epigenetics of reprogramming to induced pluripotency. Cell 152, 1324-1343 (2013).
45. Loh, Y. H. et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 38, 431-440 (2006).
46. Chen, X. et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106-1117 (2008). (Pubitemid 351787745)
47. Chambers, I. & Tomlinson, S. R. The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency. Development 136, 2311-2322 (2009).
48. Matsuda, T. et al. STAT3 activation is sufficient to maintain an undifferentiated state of mouse embryonic stem cells. EMBO J. 18, 4261-4269 (1999). (Pubitemid 29364128)
49. Fu, Y., Sinha, M., Peterson, C. L. & Weng, Z. The insulator binding protein CTCF positions 20 nucleosomes around its binding sites across the human genome. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000138 (2008).
50. Hu, G. et al. Regulation of nucleosome landscape and transcription factor targeting at tissue-specific enhancers by BRG1. Genome Res. 21, 1650-1658 (2011).
51. Kornberg, R. D. & Stryer, L. Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 6677-6690 (1988).
52. Mavrich, T. et al. Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome. Nature 453, 358-362 (2008). (Pubitemid 351693129)
53. Allan, J., Fraser, R. M., Owen-Hughes, T. & Keszenman-Pereyra, D. Micrococcal nuclease does not substantially bias nucleosome mapping. J. Mol. Biol. 417, 152-164 (2012).
54. Soufi, A., Donahue, G. & Zaret, K. S. Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors initial engagement with the genome. Cell 151, 994-1004 (2012).
55. Stadtfeld, M. et al. Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 465 175-181 2010
56. Soufi, A. & Zaret, K. S. Understanding impediments to cellular conversion to pluripotency by assessing the earliest events in ectopic transcription factor binding to the genome. Cell Cycle 12, 1487-1491 (2013).
57. Hawkins, R. D. et al. Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 479-491 (2010).
58. Hu, G. et al. H2A. Z facilitates access of active and repressive complexes to chromatin in embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 12, 180-192 (2013).
59. Bryant, G. O. et al. Activator control of nucleosome occupancy in activation and repression of transcription. PLoS Biol. 6, 2928-2939 (2008).
60. Zwaka, T. P. & Thomson, J. A. Homologous recombination in human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 319-321 (2003). (Pubitemid 36314818)
61. Bowman, S. K. et al. Multiplexed Illumina sequencing libraries from picogram quantities of DNA. BMC Genomics 14, 466 (2013).
62. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memoryefficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
63. Tolstorukov, M. Y., Kharchenko, P. V., Goldman, J. A., Kingston, R. E. & Park, P. J. Comparative analysis of H2A. Z nucleosome organization in the human and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 19, 967-977 (2009).
64. Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).
65. Machanick, P. & Bailey, T. L. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 1696-1697 (2011).