Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells

Nature

Volumn 465, Issue 7295, 2010, Pages 175-181

  Stadtfeld, Matthias ^a,b   Apostolou, Effie ^a,b   Akutsu, Hidenori ^c   Fukuda, Atsushi ^d   Follett, Patricia ^a   Natesan, Sridaran ^e   Kono, Tomohiro ^d   Shioda, Toshi ^b   Hochedlinger, Konrad ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR CHILD HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Japan)

^d TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Japan)

^e Sanofi Aventis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIO3 PROTEIN; DLK1 PROTEIN; GTL2 PROTEIN; HISTONE DEACETYLASE INHIBITOR; MESSENGER RNA; MICRORNA; PROTEIN; RIAN PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CHROMOSOME; CLONE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; RNA; RODENT;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL CLONE; CELL MATURATION; CHIMERA; CHROMOSOME 12Q; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENE REPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME IMPRINTING; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE SILENCING; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; INTERCELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MICE; MICRORNAS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PROTEINS; RNA, MESSENGER; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

ANIMALIA; CHIMAERIFORMES; MURINAE; MUS;

EID: 77952425747     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature09017     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-676 (2006).
2. Hochedlinger, K. & Plath, K. Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development 136, 509-523 (2009).
3. Maherali, N. et al. A high-efficiency system for the generation and study of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 3, 340-345 (2008).
4. Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454, 49-55 (2008).
5. Wernig, M. et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318-324 (2007). (Pubitemid 47080337)
6. Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448, 313-317 (2007).
7. Boland, M. J. et al. Adult mice generated from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 461, 91-94 (2009).
8. Zhao, X. Y. et al. iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation. Nature 461, 86-90 (2009).
9. Kang, L., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Kou, Z. & Gao, S. iPS cells can support full-term development of tetraploid blastocyst-complemented embryos. Cell Stem Cell 5, 135-138 (2009).
10. Nagy, A. et al. Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Development 110, 815-821 (1990).
11. Eggan, K. et al. Hybrid vigor, fetal overgrowth, and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6209-6214 (2001).
12. Kim, J. B. et al. Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature 454, 646-650 (2008).
13. Hanna, J. et al. Direct reprogramming of terminally differentiated mature B lymphocytes to pluripotency. Cell 133, 250-264 (2008).
14. Meissner, A., Wernig, M. & Jaenisch, R. Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 25, 1177-1181 (2007).
15. Chin, M. H. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. Cell Stem Cell 5, 111-123 (2009).
16. Marchetto, M. C. et al. Transcriptional signature and memory retention of human-induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS One 4, e7076 (2009).
17. Wilson, K. D. et al. MicroRNA profiling of human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 18, 749-758 (2009).
18. Pick, M. et al. Clone-and gene-specific aberrations of parental imprinting in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 27, 2686-2690 (2009).
19. Doi, A. et al. Differential methylation of tissue-and cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts. Nature Genet. 41, 1350-1353 (2009).
20. Deng, J. et al. Targeted bisulfite sequencing reveals changes in DNA methylation associated with nuclear reprogramming. Nature Biotechnol. 27, 353-360 (2009).
21. Brambrink, T., Hochedlinger, K., Bell, G. & Jaenisch, R. ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 933-938 (2006).
22. Wakayama, S. et al. Equivalency of nuclear transfer-derived embryonic stem cells to those derived from fertilized mouse blastocysts. Stem Cells 24, 2023-2033 (2006).
23. Soldner, F. et al. Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell 136, 964-977 (2009).
24. Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Borkent, M. & Hochedlinger, K. A reprogrammable mouse strain from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells. Nature Methods 7, 53-55 (2009).
25. Sommer, C. A. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell generation using a single lentiviral stem cell cassette. Stem Cells 27, 543-549 (2009).
26. Beard, C., Hochedlinger, K., Plath, K., Wutz, A. & Jaenisch, R. Efficient method to generate single-copy transgenic mice by site-specific integration in embryonic stem cells. Genesis 44, 23-28 (2006).
27. da Rocha, S. T., Edwards, C. A., Ito, M., Ogata, T. & Ferguson-Smith, A. C. Genomic imprinting at the mammalian Dlk1-Dio3 domain. Trends Genet. 24, 306-316 (2008).
28. Humpherys, D. et al. Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice. Science 293, 95-97 (2001).
29. Seitz, H. et al. Imprinted microRNA genes transcribed antisense to a reciprocally imprinted retrotransposon-like gene. Nature Genet. 34, 261-262 (2003).
30. Seitz, H. et al. A large imprinted microRNA gene cluster at the mouse Dlk1-Gtl2 domain. Genome Res. 14, 1741-1748 (2004).
31. Takahashi, N. et al. Deletion of Gtl2, imprinted non-coding RNA, with its differentially methylated region induces lethal parent-origin-dependent defects in mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 1879-1888 (2009).
32. Lin, S. P. et al. Differential regulation of imprinting in the murine embryo and placenta by the Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting control region. Development 134, 417-426 (2007).
33. Steshina, E. Y. et al. Loss of imprinting at the Dlk1-Gtl2 locus caused by insertional mutagenesis in the Gtl2 59 region. BMC Genet. 7, 44 (2006).
34. da Rocha, S. T. et al. Gene dosage effects of the imprinted delta-like homologue 1 (dlk1/pref1) in development: implications for the evolution of imprinting. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000392 (2009).
35. Lin, S. P. et al. Asymmetric regulation of imprinting on the maternal and paternal chromosomes at the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted cluster on mouse chromosome 12. Nature Genet. 35, 97-102 (2003).
36. Carr, M. S., Yevtodiyenko, A., Schmidt, C. L. & Schmidt, J. V. Allele-specific histone modifications regulate expression of the Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted domain. Genomics 89, 280-290 (2007).
37. Dean, W. et al. Altered imprinted gene methylation and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse fetuses: association with aberrant phenotypes. Development 125, 2273-2282 (1998).
38. Tevendale, M., Watkins, M., Rasberry, C., Cattanach, B. & Ferguson-Smith, A. C. Analysis of mouse conceptuses with uniparental duplication/deficiency for distal chromosome 12: comparison with chromosome 12 uniparental disomy and implications for genomic imprinting. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 113,215-222 (2006).
39. Schmidt, J. V., Matteson, P. G., Jones, B. K., Guan, X. J. & Tilghman, S. M. The Dlk1 and Gtl2 genes are linked and reciprocally imprinted. Genes Dev. 14, 1997-2002 (2000).
40. Eggan, K. et al. Mice cloned from olfactory sensory neurons. Nature 428, 44-49 (2004).
41. Li, J., Ishii, T., Feinstein, P. & Mombaerts, P. Odorant receptor gene choice is reset by nuclear transfer from mouse olfactory sensory neurons. Nature 428, 393-399 (2004). (Pubitemid 38419679)
42. Ono, Y. & Kono, T. Irreversible barrier to the reprogramming of donor cells in cloning with mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells. Biol. Reprod. 75, 210-216 (2006).
43. Stadtfeld, M., Nagaya, M., Utikal, J., Weir, G. & Hochedlinger, K. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration. Science 322, 945-949 (2008).
44. Yu, J. et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cells free of vector and transgene sequences. Science 324, 797-801 (2009).
45. Navarro, P. et al. Molecular coupling of Xist regulation and pluripotency. Science 321, 1693-1695 (2008).
46. Donohoe, M. E., Silva, S. S., Pinter, S. F., Xu, N. & Lee, J. T. The pluripotency factor Oct4 interacts with Ctcf and also controls X-chromosome pairing and counting. Nature 460, 128-132 (2009).
47. Eminli, S. et al. Differentiation stage determines potential of hematopoietic cells for reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Genet. 41, 968-976 (2009).
48. Hochedlinger, K., Yamada, Y., Beard, C. & Jaenisch, R. Ectopic expression of Oct-4 blocks progenitor-cell differentiation and causes dysplasia in epithelial tissues. Cell 121, 465-477 (2005).
49. Coser, K. R. et al. Global analysis of ligand sensitivity of estrogen inducible and suppressible genes in MCF7/BUS breast cancer cells by DNA microarray. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13994-13999 (2003).
50. Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O. & Botstein, D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14863-14868 (1998).