Web-based reading annotation system with an attention-based self-regulated learning mechanism for promoting reading performance

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 959-980

  Chen, Chih Ming ^a   Huang, Sheng Hui ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; E-LEARNING; WEBSITES;

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS; RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED; READING COMPREHENSION; READING PERFORMANCE; SELF-REGULATED LEARNING; SELF-REGULATED LEARNING MECHANISMS; SUSTAINED ATTENTION; WEB-BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENT;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84906511723     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12119     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G. & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
2. Baker, F. B. (1992). Item response theory: parameter estimation techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.
3. Belle, A., Hargraves, R. H. & Najarian, K. (2012). An automated optimal engagement and attention detection system using electrocardiogram. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 1-12.
4. Bi, L. & Fan, X. (2011). Emotion recognition from EEG based on Bayesian networks. Energy Procedia, 11, 278-285.
5. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161-186.
6. Boersma, H. & Das, J. P. (2008). Attention, attention rating and cognitive assessment: a review and a study. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 36, 1&2, 1-17.
7. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon press.
8. Butler, D. B. & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Education Research, 65, 3, 245-281.
9. Chang, M. M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction: an investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 3, 217-230.
10. Chen, C. M. (2009). Personalized e-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5, 8816-8829.
11. Chen, C. M. & Sun, Y. C. (2012). Assessing the effects of different multimedia materials on emotions and learning performance for visual and verbal style learners. Computers & Education, 59, 4, 1273-1285.
12. Chen, C. M. & Wang, H. P. (2011). Using emotion recognition technology to assess the effects of different multimedia materials on learning emotion and performance. Library & Information Science Research, 33, 244-255.
13. Chen, C. M., Wang, J. Y. & Chen, Y. C. (in press). Facilitating English-language reading performance by a digital reading annotation system with self-regulated learning mechanisms. Educational Technology & Society.
14. Chen, Y. C., Hwang, R. H. & Wang, C. Y. (2012). Development and evaluation of a Web 2.0 annotation system as a learning tool in an e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 58, 4, 1094-1105.
15. Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M. & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self explanation improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 3, 439-477.
16. Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.
17. Das, J. P. (1986). Attention checklist. Edmonton, Canada: J. P. Das Developmental Disabilities Center, University of Alberta.
18. Driver, J. (2001). A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 53-78.
19. Egner, T. & Gruzelier, J. H. (2004). EEG biofeedback of low beta band components: frequency-specific effects on variables of attention and event-related brain potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 131-139.
20. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
21. Gerě, I. & Jaušcvec, N. (1999). Multimedia: differences in cognitive processes observed with EEG. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 3, 5-14.
22. Goh, T. T., Seet, B. C. & Chen, N. S. (2012). The impact of persuasive SMS on students' self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 4, 624-640.
23. Groner, R. & Groner, M. T. (1989). Attention and eye movement control: an overview. European Archives of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 239, 1, 9-16.
24. Hannafin, M. J. & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202.
25. Hardy, J. L., Drescher, D., Sarkar, K., Kellett, G. & Scanlon, M. (2011). Enhancing visual attention and working memory with a web-based cognitive training program. Mensa Research Journal, 42, 2, 13-20.
26. Harnishferger, K. K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: theories, definitions, research. In F. N. Dempster, & C. J. Brainerd (Eds), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 176-206). San Diego: Academic Press.
27. Hinton, C., Miyamoto, K. & Della Chiesa, B. (2008). Brain research, learning, and emotions: implications for education research, policy, and practice. European Journal of Education, 43, 87-103.
28. Hsu, C. C., Chen, H. C., Su, Y. N. & Huang, K. K. (2012). Developing a reading concentration monitoring system by applying an artificial bee colony algorithm to e-books in an intelligent classroom. Sensors, 12, 10, 14158-14178.
29. Jacobson, M. & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 149-199.
30. James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
31. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: the science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
32. Kilseop, R. & Rohae, M. (2005). Evaluation of mental workload with a combined measure based on physiological indices during a dual task of tracking and mental arithmetic. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 11, 991-1009.
33. Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckman (Eds), Action control: from cognition to behavior (pp. 101-128). New York: Springer.
34. Lam, C. M. & Beale, I. L. (1991). Relations among sustained attention, reading performance, and teachers' ratings of behavior problems. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 40-47.
35. Lee, I. S. (2002). Gender differences in self-regulated on-line learning strategies within Korea's University context. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 1, 101-109.
36. Ley, K. & Young, D. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulated learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49, 2, 93-102.
37. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B. & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford university press.
38. Li, X., Zhao, Q., Liu, L., Peng, H., Qi, Y., Mao, C., et al (2010). Improve affective learning with EEG approach. Computing and Informatics, 29, 557-570.
39. Margolis, J. (1972). Academic correlates of sustained attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
40. Marshall, C. C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. The ninth ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia: links, objects, time and space-structure in hypermedia systems: links, objects, time and space-structure in hypermedia systems, 40-49.
41. Moradi, F., Buračas, G. T. & Buxton, R. B. (2012). Attention strongly increases oxygen metabolic response to stimulus in primary visual cortex. Neuroimage, 59, 1, 601-607.
42. Mory, E. H. (2003). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: a project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed.). (pp. 745-783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. NeuroSky MindWave (2011). Retrieved December 4, 2011, from http://press.neurosky.com/MindWave.html
44. Nideffer, R. M. (1976). Test of attentional and interpersonal style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 3, 394-404.
45. Niemi, H., Nevgi, A. & Virtanen, P. (2003). Towards self-regulation in web-based learning. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 49-71.
46. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47. Pintrich, P. R. & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1, 33-40.
48. Pressley, M. (1995). More about the development of self-regulation: complex, longterm and thoroughly social. Educational Psychologist, 30, 4, 207-212.
49. Rapp, D. N. (2006). The value of attention aware systems in educational settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 4, 603-614.
50. Rau, P. L. P., Chen, S. H. & Chin, Y. T. (2004). Developing web annotation tools for learners and instructors. Interacting with Computers, 16, 163-181.
51. Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Dunwell, I., Martínez-Mirõn, E., Vargas-Cerdán, M., de Freitas, S., Liarokapis, F., et al (2009). Assessing NeuroSky's usability to detect attention levels in an assessment exercise. In: HCI, New Trends, 149-158.
52. Richards, J. E. & Casey, B. J. (1991). Heart rate variability during attention phases in young infants. Psychophysiology, 28, 43-53.
53. Roda, C. & Thomas, J. (2006). Attention aware systems: theories, applications, and research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 4, 557-587.
54. Roscoe, R. D., Segedy, J. R., Sulcer, B., Jeong, H. & Biswas, G. (2013). Shallow strategy development in a teachable agent environment designed to support self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 62, 286-297.
55. Sarter, M., Givens, B. & Bruno, J. P. (2001). The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Research Reviews, 35, 146-160.
56. Shih, K. P., Chang, C. Y., Chen, H. C. & Wang, S. S. (2005). A self-regulated learning system with scaffolding support for self-regulated e/m-learning. The 3rd IEEE international conference on information technology: research and education, 30-34.
57. Sohlberg, M. M. & Mateer, C. A. (1989). Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
58. Solso, R. L. (1995). Cognitive psychology (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
59. Steinmayr, R., Ziegler, M. & Träuble, B. (2010). Do intelligence and sustained attention interact in predicting academic achievement? Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 14-18.
60. Su, A. Y. S., Yang, S. J. H., Hwang, W. Y. & Zhang, J. (2010). A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 55, 2, 752-766.
61. Toet, A. (2006). Gaze directed displays as an enabling technology for attention aware systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 4, 615-647.
62. Wager, T. D., Jonides, J. & Reading, S. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 22, 1679-1693.
63. Wilson, G. F. (2002). An analysis of mental workload in pilots during flight using multiple psychophysiological measures. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 12, 1, 3-18.
64. Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-188.
65. Winne, P. H. & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds), Matecognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Wolfe, J. (2002). Annotation technologies: a software and research review. Computers and Composition, 19, 4, 471-497.
67. Wolfe, J. (2008). Annotations and the collaborative digital library: effects of an aligned annotation interface on student argumentation and reading strategies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 2, 141-164.
68. Wolters, C. A. & Pintrich, R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27-47.
69. Yukselturk, E. & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 3, 12-22.
70. Zhang, W. & Lu, J. (2009). The practice of affective teaching: a view from brain science. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 1, 1, 35-41.
71. Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S. & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learner: beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
72. Zimmerman, B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1, 51-59.
73. Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Reflections on theories, identities, and actions of self-regulated learners. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspectives (pp. 289-307). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.