Annotation technologies: A software and research review

Computers and Composition

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 471-497

  Wolfe, Joanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Annotation; Collaboration; Computer mediated communication; Instructor feedback; Technology review; Writing from sources

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036898737     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S8755-4615(02)00144-5     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bargeron, David, Gupta, Anoop, Grudin, Jonathan, & Sanocki, Elizabeth. (2001). Annotations for streaming video on the Web. Microsoft Research. Retrieved February 10, 2001, from
2. Baldonado, Michelle, Cousins, Steve, Gwizdka, Jacek, & Paepcke, Andreas. (2000). Notable: At the intersection of annotations and handheld technology. Proceedings of HUC 2000 (pp. 100-113). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
3. Bush, Vannevar. (1945, July). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176, 101-108.
4. Cadiz, J. J., Gupta, Anoop, & Grudin, Jonathan. (2000). Using Web annotations for asynchronous collaboration around documents. Conference on computer supported cooperative work. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
5. Dayton, David. (1998). Technical editing online: The quest for transparent technology. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 28(1), 3-38.
6. Dragga, Sam. (1991). Responding to technical writing. The Technical Writing Teacher, 18(3), 202-221.
7. Farkas, David K., & Poltrock, Steven E. (1995). Online editing, markup models, and the workplace lives of editors and writers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38(2), 110-117.
8. Flower, Linda, Stein, Victoria, Ackerman, John, Kantz, Margaret J., McCormick, Kathleen, & Peck, Wayne C. (1990). Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Golovchinsky, Gene, & Marshall, Catherine. (2000). Hypertext interaction revisited. In Hypertext 2000 (pp. 171-179). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
10. Golovchinsky, Gene, Price, Morgan N., & Schilit, Bill N. (1999). From reading to retrieval: Freeform ink annotations as queries. In Proceedings of SIGIR '99 (pp. 19-25). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
11. Graham, Jamey. (1999). The reader's helper: A personalized document reading environment. CHI '99 (pp. 481-488). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
12. Hardock, Gary, Kurtenbach, Gordon, & Buxton, William. (1993). A Marking-based interface for collaborative writing. Proceedings of the sixth annual association for computing machinery symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 259-266). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
13. Haas, Christina, & Neuwirth, Christine M. (1994). Writing the technology that writes us: Research on literacy and the shape of technology. In C. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 319-340). New York: Modern Language Association.
14. Higgins, Lorraine. (1993). Reading to argue: Helping students transform source texts. In Ann M. Penrose & Barbara M. Sitko (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom (pp. 70-101). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Honneycutt, Lee. (2001). Comparing email and synchronous conferencing in online peer response. Written Communication, 18(1), 26-60.
16. Horn-Christopher, Doris A. Van. (1995). Voice-graded business communication documents. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(3), 35-38.
17. Kraut, Robert, Galegher, Jolene, Fish, Robert, & Chalfonte, Barbara. (1992). Task requirements and media choice in collaborative writing. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 375-407.
18. Lunsford, Andrea, & Ruszkiewicz, John. (1999). The presence of others (3rd ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press.
19. Marshall, Catherine C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Hypertext98 (pp. 40-49). Pittsburgh, PA: Association for Computing Machinery Press.
20. Marshall, Catherine C., Price, Morgan N., Golovchinsky, Gene, & Schilit, Bill N. (1999). Introducing a digital library reading appliance into a reading group. In Digital libraries '99 (pp. 77-84). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
21. Neuwirth, Christine M., Chandhok, Ravinder, Charney, Davida, Wojahn, Patricia, & Kim, Loel. (1994). Distributed collaborative writing: A comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents. In Human factors in computing systems (pp. 51-57). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
22. Neuwirth, Christine, Kaufer, David, Chimera, Rick, & Gillespie, Terilyn. (1987). The NOTES program: A hypertext application for writing-from-source texts. Hypertext '87 (pp. 121-141). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
23. Neuwirth, Christine M., Kaufer, David S., Chandhok, Ravinder, & Morris, James H. (1990). Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting. Proceedings of the conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW '90) (pp. 183-195). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
24. Neuwirth, Christine M., & Wojahn, Patricia G. (1996). Learning to write: Computer support for a cooperative process. In Timothy Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 147-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Nichols, David M., Pemberton, Duncan, Dalhoumi, Salah, Larouk, Omar, Belisle, Clair, & Twidale, Michael B. (2000). DEBORA: Developing an interface to support collaboration in a digital library. In Proceedings of the fourth European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries (ECDL 2000) (pp. 239-248). Lisbon, Portugal: Springer.
26. O'Hara, Kenton, & Sellen, Abigail. (1997). A comparison of reading paper and online documents. In conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 97). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
27. Ovsiannikov, Ilia A., Arbib, Michael A., & McNeil, Thomas H. (1999). Annotation technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50, 329-362.
28. Pearce, C. Glenn, & Ackley, R. Jon. (1995). Audiotaped feedback in business writing: An exploratory study. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(3), 31-35.
29. Salvatori, Mariolina. (1996). The argument of reading in the teaching of composition. In B. Emmel, P. Resch, & D. Tenney (Eds.), Argument revisited, argument redefined: Negotiating meaning in the composition classroom (pp. 181-197). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
30. Say NO To Third Voice! (1999). Retrieved December 21, 2001, from .
31. Schcolnik, Miriam. (2001). A study of reading with dedicated ereaders. Unpublished Dissertation. Nova Southeastern University.
32. Schilit, Bill N., Price, Morgan N., Golovchinsky, Gene, Tanaka, Kei, & Marshall, Catherine C. (1999, January). As we may read: The reading appliance revolution. Computer, 65-73.
33. Shipman, Frank M., III, Richard, Furuta, Brenner, Donald, Chung, Chung-Chi, & Hsieh, Hao-Wei. (1998). Using paths in the classroom: Experiences and adaptations. In Hypertext '98: The proceedings of the ninth association for computing machinery conference on hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 267-276). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
34. Smith, Brian K., Blankinship, Erik, & Lackner, Tamara. (2000). Annotation and education. IEEE Multimedia, 7(2), 84-89.
35. Smith, Brian K., & Reiser, Brian J. (1997). What should a wildebeest say? Interactive nature films for high school classrooms. Proceedings of the fifth association for computing machinery international conference on multimedia. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
36. van Oostendorp, Herre. (1996). Studying and annotating electronic text. In Jean-Francois Rouet, Jarmo J. Levonen, Andrew Dillon, & Rand J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 137-148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Whittaker, Steve, Hyland, Patrick, & Wiley, Myrtle. (1994). FILOCHAT: Handwritten notes provide access to recorded conversations. In conference proceedings of human factors in computing systems: Celebrating interdependence (pp. 271-277). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
38. Wojahn, Patricia G., Neuwirth, Christine M., & Bullock, Barbara. (1998). Effects of interfaces for annotation on communication in a collaborative task. In CHI '98, conference proceedings on human factors in computing systems (pp. 456-463). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
39. Wolfe, Joanna L., & Neuwirth, Christine M. (2001). From the margins to the center: The future of annotation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(3), 333-371.
40. Yee, Ka-Ping. (1999). CRITLINK mediator [web page]. Retrieved May 17, 2001, from .
41. Zellweger, Polle T., Chang, Bay-Wei, & Mackinlay, Jack D. (1998). Fluid links for informed and incremental link transitions. In Hypertext '98, proceedings of the ninth association for computing machinery conference on hypertext and hypermedia: Links, objects, time and space-structure in hypermedia systems (pp. 50-57). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
42. Zellweger, Polle T., Regli, Susan Harkness, Mackinlay, Jack D., & Chang, Bay-Wei. (2000). The impact of FLUID DOCUMENTS on reading and browsing: an observational study. Proceedings of the CHI 2000 conference on computer-human interaction (pp. 249-256). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.