Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 12-22

  Yukselturk, Erman ^a   Bulut, Safure ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Gender; Motivational beliefs; Online learner; Self regulated learning strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649309893     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004, Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Learning in Education.
2. Astleitner, H., & Steinberg, R. (2005). Are there gender differences in web-based learning? An integrated model and related effect sizes. AACE Journal, 13 (1), 47-63.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Benson, A.D. (2003). Assessing participant learning in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 69-78.
5. Bidjerano, T. (2005). Gender differences in self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, October 19-21, Kerhonkson, NY, USA.
6. Bong, M. (2001). Role of Self-Efficacy and Task-Value in Predicting College Students' Course Performance and Future Enrollment Intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26 (4), 553-570.
7. Chyung, S. Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy and academic performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8 (3), 213-222.
8. Chapell, M. S., Blanding, Z. B., Silverstein, M. E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A., & McCann, N. (2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (2), 268-274.
9. th Ed.), USA: McGraw-Hill.
10. Gunn, C., McSporran, M., Macleod, H., & French, S. (2003). Dominant or different? Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 14-30.
11. Hargittai, E. & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87 (2), 432-448.
12. Hendricks, N. J., Ekici, C., & Bulut, S.(2000). Adaptation of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire, Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
13. Home, A. M. (1998). Predicting role conflict, overload and contagion in adult women university students with families and jobs. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 85-97.
14. Isler, V. (1998). Sanal universite: Dusunceler ve deneyimler. Paper presented at Bilgi Teknolojileri Isiginda Egitim (BTIE), TBD and IEEE Turkiye Bolumu, Ankara, Turkey.
15. Joo, Y., Bong, M., & Choi, H. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-Based Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (2), 5-17.
16. Kramarae, C. (2003). Gender equity online, when there is no door to knock on. In D. Moore & W. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 261-272), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Lee, I.-S. (2002). Gender differences in self-regulated on-line learning strategies within Korea's University context. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50 (1), 101-109.
18. Lu, J., Yu, C,-S., & Liu, C. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information & Management, 40, 497-507.
19. Mason, R. (2002). Rethinking assessment for the online environment. In C. Vrasidas & C. V. Glass (Ed.), Current Perspectives on Applied Information Technologies (pp. 57-74), Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
20. MoNE (2007). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2006-2007, Ankara: MoNE.
21. Niemcyzk, M., & Savenye, W. (2005). Self-regulation in a computer literacy course. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9 (4), 55-61.
22. Ono H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84 (1), 111-121.
23. Ory, J. C., Bullock, C., & Burnaska, K. (1997). Gender similarity in the use of and attitudes about ALN in a university setting. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1 (1), 1-17.
24. Ozturk, B. (2003). Relationships among self-reulated learning components, motivational beliefs and mathematics achievement, Ancara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
25. Ozturk, B., Bulut, S., & Koc, Y. (2007). Motivation and self-regulation in mathematics. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 11 (1), 149-154.
26. Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich (Ed.), Understanding Self-regulated Learning (pp. 3-12), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31 (6), 459-470.
28. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
30. Price, L. (2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: challenging stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 349-359.
31. Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative Assessment Approaches for Online Learning Environments in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23 (1), 101-111.
32. Rickert, A., & Sacharow, A. (2000). It's a woman's World Wide Web, Reston, VA: Media Matrix and Jupiter Communications.
33. Rovai, A. P., & Baker, J. D. (2005). Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning, and interpersonal interactions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6 (1), 31-44.
34. Sierra, C., & Wang, M. (2002). Gender, discourse style, and equal participation in online learning. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2002 Conference (pp. 2364-2367), Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
35. rd Ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
36. Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 805-818.
37. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
38. Taplin, M., & Jegede, O. (2001). Gender differences in factors influencing achievement of distance education students. Open Learning, 16 (2), 133-154.
39. Turkish Statistical Institute (2004). Turkey' Statistical Year Book: Labor, Ankara: TSI.
40. Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: the role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18 (2), 151-163.
41. Young, S., & McSporran, M. (2001). Confident men-successful women: Gender differences in online Learning. In C. Montgomerie & J. Viteli (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2001 Conference (pp. 2110-2112), Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
42. Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for Student Success in an Online Course. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (2), 71-83.
43. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.
44. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 51-59.