Hierarchical systems of attention and action

Attention in Action: Advances from Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 27-67

  Cohen, Asher ^a   Magen, Hagit ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905797353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203449226     Document Type: Chapter

References (131)

1. Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & D. F. Saunders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp.395-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
2. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds), Attention and performance XV. Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp.421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Andersen, R. A., & Buneo, C. A. (2002). Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 189-220.
4. Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997). Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 20, 303-330.
5. Anderson, S. J., Yamagishi, N., & Karavia, V. (2002). Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 269, 1225-1232.
6. Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R., & Maddox, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object recognition. Psychological Review, 103, 165-192.
7. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In A. Collins, S. Gathercole, M. Conway, & P. Morris (Eds.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-90). New York: Academic Press.
8. Bashinski, H. S., & Bacharach, B. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selective attending to spatial locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 241-248.
9. Behrmann, M., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Attention accesses multiple reference frames: evidence from visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 83-101.
10. Briand, K. A., & Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue": on the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 228-241.
11. Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
12. Buxbaum, L. J., & Permaul, P. (2001). Hand-centered attentional and motor asymmetries in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 39, 653-664.
13. Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
14. Casey, B. J., Thomas, K. M., Welsh, T. F., Badgaiyan, R. D., Eccard, C. H., Jennings, J. R. et al. (2000). Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 8728-8733.
15. Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1989). Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 650-663.
16. Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1991). Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 891-901.
17. Cohen, A., & Magen, H. (1999). Intra-and cross-dimensional visual search for single feature targets. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 291-307.
18. Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. (1993). Orientation asymmetry in the flanker task. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 693-703.
19. Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints on response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
20. Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. (2000). Response selection processes for conjunctive targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 391-411.
21. Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., & McClelland, J. L. (1992). A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 239-269.
22. Connolly, J. D., Goodale, M. A., Desouza, J. F. X., Menon, R. S., & Vilis, T. (2000). A comparison of frontoparietal fMRI activation during anti-saccades and antipointing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 1645-1655.
23. Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000). Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 292-297.
24. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
25. Craft, J. L., & Simon, J. R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415-420.
26. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umilta, C. (1999). Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673-1692.
27. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980.
28. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional auto-maticity: a dual-process model of the effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
29. DeSoto, M. C., Fabiani, M., Geary, D. C., & Gratton, G. (2001). When in doubt, do it both ways: brain evidence of the simultaneous activation of conflicting motor responses in a spatial Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 523-536.
30. Diedrichsen, J., Ivry, R. B., Cohen, A., & Danziger, S. (2000). Asymmetries in a unilateral flanker task depend on the direction of the response: the role of atten-tional shift and perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 113-126.
31. Di Pace E., Marangolo, P., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1997). Response bias in colour priming. Acta Psychologica, 95, 3-14.
32. Driver, J. (2001). A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. Journal of the British Psychological Society, 92, 53-78.
33. Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448-456.
34. Driver, J., & Spence, C. (1999). Cross-modal links in spatial attention. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action: studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp.130-149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.
36. Duncan, J. (1983). Perceptual selection based on alphanumeric class: evidence from partial reports. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 533-547.
37. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
38. Duncan, J. (2001). An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 820-829.
39. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
40. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
41. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
42. Eriksen, C. W., & Eriksen, B. A. (1979). Target redundancy in visual search: do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing? Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 195-205.
43. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 201-204.
44. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058-1079.
45. Feintuch, U., & Cohen, A. (2002). Visual attention and co-activation of response decisions for features from different dimensions. Psychological Science, 13, 362-370.
46. Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
47. Fuster, J. M. (1989).The prefrontal cortex: anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe. New York: Raven.
48. Gehring, W. J., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 516-520.
49. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information-strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
50. Hillyard, S. A. (1985). Electrophysiology of human selective attention. Trends in Neurosciences, 8, 400-405.
51. Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
52. Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
53. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
54. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
55. Hommel, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392-420.
56. Husain, M., Mattingley, J. B., Rorden, C., Kennard, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Distinguishing sensory and motor biases in parietal and frontal neglect. Brain, 123, 1643-1659.
57. Johnston, J. C., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (1995). Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
58. Kahneman, D. & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.) Varieties of attention (pp.29-62). New York: Academic Press.
59. Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167-178.
60. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive bias for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
61. LaBerge, D. (1994). Quantitative models of attention and response processes in shape identification tasks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 198-243.
62. LaBerge, D., Brown, V, Carter, M., Bash, D., & Hartley, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 65-76.
63. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
64. Lien, M. -C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1260-1280.
65. Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 212-238.
66. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
67. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: a review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 174-207.
68. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
69. Maddox, W. T. (2001). Separating perceptual processes from decisional processes in identification and categorization. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 1183-1200.
70. Magen, H., & Cohen, A. (2002). Action-based and vision-based selection of input: two sources of control. Psychological Research, 66, 247-259.
71. Magen, H., & Cohen, A. (2004). Concurrent response activation in overlapping tasks. Manuscript submitted for publication.
72. McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-484.
73. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of human multiple-task performance: the EPIC information-processing architecture and strategic response deferment model. Psychological Review, 104, 1-65.
74. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of human multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory phenomena. Psychological Review, 107, 749-791.
75. Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., Webb, A., Barad, V., Cohen, N. J., Wszalek, T. et al. (2001). The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 467-473.
76. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
77. Miller, J. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 270-288.
78. Muller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention-time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
79. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
80. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251.
81. Nobre, A. C., Sebestyen, G. N., Gitelman, D. R., Mesulam, M. M., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1997). Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. Brain, 120, 515-533.
82. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum Press.
83. Pashler, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: evidence for a two component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 469-514.
84. Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1023-1040.
85. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
86. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
87. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
88. Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature, 331(6157), 585-589.
89. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
90. Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391-408.
91. Posner, M. I., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks. Trends in Neuroscience, 17, 75-79.
92. Posner, M. I., Inhoff, A. W., Friedrich, F. J., & Cohen, A. (1987). Isolating attentional systems: a cognitive-anatomical analysis. Psychobiology, 15, 107-121.
93. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
94. Posner, M. I., Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240, 1627-1631.
95. Posner, M. I., Sandson, J., Dhawan, M., & Shulman, G. L. (1989). Is word recognition automatic? A cognitive-anatomical approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 50-60.
96. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
97. Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863-1874.
98. Rafal, R. (1994). Neglect. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 4, 231-236.
99. Rafal, R., Danziger, S., Grossi, G., Machado, L., & Ward, R. (2002). Visual detection is gated by attending for action: evidence from hemispatial neglect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 16371-16375.
100. Remington, R. W., & Folk, C. L. (2001). A dissociation between attention and selection. Psychological Science, 12, 511-515.
101. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Edwards, M. G. (2000). Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing object selection from action (effector) selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 547-562.
102. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp.231-266). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
104. Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E. et al. (1999). Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 791-814.
105. Schweickert, R. (1980). Critical-path scheduling of mental processes in a dual task. Science, 209, 704-706.
106. Servan-Schreiber, D. (1990). From physiology to behavior: computational models of catecholamine modulation of information processing. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
107. Seymour, P. H. (1973). Stroop interference in naming and verifying spatial locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 95-100.
108. Shallice T., & Burgess, P. (1993). Supervisory control of action and thought selection. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: selection, awareness, and control (pp.171-187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
109. Shiffrin, R. M. (1988). Attention. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzay, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 2. Learning and cognition (pp.739-811). New York: Wiley.
110. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs, 74(11, Whole No. 498), 29.
111. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp.276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
112. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
113. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for colour and form. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
114. Theeuwes, J., & Godijn, R. (2001). Attentional and oculomotor capture. In C. L. Folk B. S. Gibson (Eds.), Attraction, distraction and action: multiple perspectives on attentional capture. (pp. 121-149). (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 133.) New York: Elsevier.
115. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504.
116. Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905.
117. Treisman, A. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282-299.
118. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
119. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
120. Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 131-139.
121. Turatto, M., Benso, F., Galfano, G., & Umilta, C. (2002). Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 628-639.
122. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1997). Decision and response in dual-task interference. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 266-307.
123. von Wright, J.M. (1968). Selection in visual immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 62-68.
124. von Wright, J. M. (1970). On selection in visual immediate memory. Acta Psychologica, 33, 280-292.
125. von Wright, J. M. (1972). On the problem of selection in iconic memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13, 159-170.
126. Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance: a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
127. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
128. Wong, K. F. E. (2002). The relationship between attentional blink and psychological refractory period. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 54-71.
129. Yantis, Y., & Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 812-825.
130. Yantis, Y., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 135-149.
131. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.