Decision and Response in Dual-Task Interference

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 266-307

  Van Selst, Mark ^a   Jolicoeur, Pierre ^b  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031525156     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0662     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bertelson, P. (1966). Central intermittency 20 years later. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 153-164.
2. Bertelson, P., & Tisseyre, F. (1969). Refractory period of c-reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 122-128.
3. Broadbent, D. E., & Gregory, M. (1967). Psychological refractory period and the length of time required to make a decision. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 168B, 181-193.
4. Comstock, E. M. (1973). Processing capacity in a letter-match task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 63-72.
5. Craik, K. W. (1947). Theory of the human operator in control systems. I. The operator as an engineering system. British Journal of Psychology, 38, 56-61.
6. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-989.
7. De Jong, R. (1995). The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 2-25.
8. De Jong, R., & Sweet, J. B. (1994). Preparatory strategies in overlapping-task performance. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 142-151.
9. Dimond, S. J. (1966). Facilitation of performance through the use of the timing system. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 181-183.
10. Donders, F. C. Over de snelheid van psychische processen. (On the speed of mental processes.) Onderzoekingen degaan in het physiologisch Laboratorium der Ugtrechtsche Hoogeschool, 1868-69, Tweede reeks, 11, 92-130. [Translated by W. G. Koster, in W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II; Acta Psychologica, 1969, 30, 412-431]
11. Donders, F. C. Over de snelheid van psychische processen. (On the speed of mental processes.) Onderzoekingen degaan in het physiologisch Laboratorium der Ugtrechtsche Hoogeschool, 1868-69, Tweede reeks, 11, 92-130. [Translated by W. G. Koster, in W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II; Acta Psychologica, 1969, 30, 412-431]
12. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058-1079.
13. Fletcher, B. C., & Rabbit, P. M. A. (1978). The changing pattern of perceptual analytic strategies and response selection with practice in a two-choice reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 417-427.
14. Gottsdanker, R. (1979). A psychological refractory period or an unprepared period? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 208-215.
15. Gottsdanker, R. (1980). The ubiquitous role of preparation. In G. E. Stelmach and J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 315-371). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. Gottsdanker, R., Broadbent, L., & Van Sant, C. (1963). Reaction time to single and to first signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 163-167.
17. Gottsdanker, R., & Stelmach, G. E. (1971). The persistence of psychological refractoriness. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 301-312.
18. Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
19. Johnston, J. C., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (1995). Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
20. Jolicoeur, P., & Van Selst, M. (1994). Monte Carlo simulations testing temporary exclusion of the most extreme value when using the modified recursive outlier elimination procedure with moving criterion. [Unpublished raw data]
21. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Karlin & Kestenbaum (1968). Effect of number of alternative on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167-178.
23. Keele, S. W. (1973). Attention and human performance. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.
24. Keele, S. W., & Neill, W. T. (1978). Mechanisms of attention. In Handbook of perception IX. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.
25. Logan, G. (1978). Attention in character classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 1-36.
26. Logan, G. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 189-207.
27. Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549-563.
28. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
29. McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-484.
30. McLeod, P. (1977a). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-667.
31. McLeod, P. (1977b). Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 41, 381-391.
32. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part I. Basic Mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
33. Meyer, D. E., Kieras, D. E., Lauber, E., Schumacher, E. H., Glass, J., Zurbriggen, E., Gmeindl, L., & Apfelblat, D. (1995). Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple-task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks. Acta Psychologica, 90, 163-190.
34. Miller, J. (1991). Reaction time analysis with outlier exclusion: Bias varies with sample size. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 907-912.
35. Mowbray, G. H., & Rhoades, M. V. (1959). On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1-36.
36. Netick, A., & Klapp, S. T. (1994). Hesitations in manual tracking: A single-channel limit in response programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 766-782.
37. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
38. Pashler, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 469-514.
39. Pashler, H. (1990). Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 826-842.
40. Pashler, H. (1994a). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
41. Pashler, H. (1994b). Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 330-342.
42. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
43. Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1969). Effects of complexity in simultaneous reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 289-296.
44. Schweickert, R., & Boggs, G. J. (1984). Models of central capacity and concurrency. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28, 223-281.
45. Smith, M. C. (1967a). Theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 202-213.
46. Smith, M. C. (1967b). The psychological refractory period as a function of performance on a first task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 350-352.
47. Smith, M. C. (1969). The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 30, 220-231.
48. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
49. Stevens, S. S., Volkman, J., & Newman, E. B. (1937). A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude of pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8, 185-190.
50. Telford, C. W. (1931). Refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1-35.
51. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis.
52. Van Selst, M. (1995). Karlin and Kestenbaum's results do not require a dual-task bottleneck. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1995. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]
53. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994a). Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 905-921.
54. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994b). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
55. Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance - A review and theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
56. Welford, A. T. (1959). Evidence of a single-channel decision mechanism limiting performance in a serial reaction task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 193-210.
57. Welford, A. T. (1980). The single-channel hypothesis. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction time (pp. 215-252). New York: Academic Press.