Separating perceptual processes from decisional processes in identification and categorization

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 63, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 1183-1200

  Maddox, W Todd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MODEL; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035488389     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194533     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. AKAIKE, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
2. ALFONSO-REESE, L. A. (1996). Dynamics of category learning. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
3. ALFONSO-REESE, L. A. (1997). On the dangers of ignoring noise in high-level perception experiments (Technical report). Bloomington: Indiana University.
4. ASHBY, F. G. (1988). Estimating the parameters of multidimensional signal detection theory from simultaneous ratings on separate stimulus components. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 195-204.
5. ASHBY, F. G. (1992a). Multidimensional models of categorization. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 449-484). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. ASHBY, F. G. (1992b). Multivariate probability distributions. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 1-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. ASHBY, F. G., ALFONSO-REESE, L. A., TURKEN, A. U., & WALDRON, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.
8. ASHBY, F. G., & LEE, W. W. (1991). Predicting similarity and categorization from identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 150-172.
9. ASHBY, F. G., & LEE, W. W. (1992). On the relationship among identification, similarity, and categorization: Reply to Nosofsky and Smith (1992). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 385-393.
10. ASHBY, F. G., & LEE, W. W. (1993). Perceptual variability as a fundamental axiom of perceptual science. In S.C. Masin (Ed.), Foundations of perceptual theory (pp. 369-399). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. ASHBY, F. G., & MADDOX, W. T. (1990). Integrating information from separable psychological dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 598-612.
12. ASHBY, F. G., & MADDOX, W. T. (1991). A response time theory of perceptual independence. In J. P. Doignon & J. C. Falmagne (Eds.), Mathematical psychology: Current developments (pp. 389-414). New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. ASHBY, F. G., & MADDOX, W. T. (1993). Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 372-400.
14. ASHBY, F. G., & MADDOX, W. T. (1994). A response time theory of perceptual separability and perceptual integrality in speeded classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 423-466.
15. ASHBY, F. G., MADDOX, W. T., & LEE, W. W. (1994). On the dangers of averaging across subjects when using multidimensional scaling or the similarity-choice model. Psychological Science, 5, 144-150.
16. ASHBY, F. G., & PERRIN, N. A. (1988). Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition. Psychological Review, 95, 124-150.
17. ASHBY, F. G., PRINZMETAL, W., IVRY, R. B., & MADDOX, W. T. (1998). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review, 103, 165-192.
18. ASHBY, F. G., & TOWNSEND, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
19. ASHBY, F. G., & WALDRON, E. M. (1999). On the nature of implicit categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 363-378.
20. ASHBY, F. G., WALDRON, E. M., LEE, W. W., & BERKMAN, A. (2001). Suboptimality in categorization and identification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 77-96.
21. BADDELEY, A. (1995). Working memory. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 755-764). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. BONNEL, A.-M., & HAFTER, E. R. (1998). Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 179-190.
23. BRAIDA, L. D., & DURLACH, N. I. (1972). Intensity perception: II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 483-502.
24. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). Psychophysics software for use with MATLAB. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
25. ESTES, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 134-140.
26. GARNER, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. New York: Wiley.
27. GARNER, W. R., & FELFOLDY, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225-241.
28. GEISLER, W. S. (1989). Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. Psychological Review, 96, 267-341.
29. GEISLER, W. S., & CHOU, K. (1995). Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: Visual search. Psychological Review, 102, 356-378.
30. GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A. (1967). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
31. JOHNSTON, J. C., MCCANN, R. S., & REMINGTON, R. W. (1995). Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
32. KHURI, A. I., & CORNELL, J. A. (1987). Response surfaces: Designs and analyses. New York: Marcel Dekker.
33. LABERGE, D. (1995). Computational and anatomical models of selective attention in object identification. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 649-664). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. LUCE, R. D. (1963). Detection and recognition. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (pp. 103-189). New York: Wiley.
35. LUCE, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. LUCE, R. D., & GREEN, D. M. (1978). Two tests of a neural attention hypothesis for auditory psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 363-371.
37. MACMILLAN, N. A., GOLDBERG, R. F., & BRAIDA, L. D. (1988). Resolution for speech sounds: Basic sensitivity and context memory on vowel and consonant continua. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 1262-1280.
38. MADDOX, W. T. (1992). Perceptual and decisional separability. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 147-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. MADDOX, W. T. (1999). On the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound models and generalized context models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 354-374.
40. MADDOX, W. T., & ASHBY, F. G. (1993). Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 49-70.
41. MADDOX, W. T. & ASHBY, F. G. (1996). Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 795-817.
42. MADDOX, W. T., & ASHBY, F. G. (1998). Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries: Comment on McKinley and Nosofsky (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 301-321.
43. MADDOX, W. T., ASHBY, F. G., & WALDRON, E. M. (2000). Multiple attention systems in perceptual categorization. Manuscript submitted for publication.
44. MADDOX, W. T., & BOGDANOV, S. V. (2000). On the relation between decision rules and perceptual representation in multidimensional perceptual categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 984-997.
45. MADDOX, W. T., PRINZMETAL, W., IVRY, R. B., & ASHBY, F. G. (1994). A probabilistic multidimensional model of location discrimination. Psychological Research, 56, 66-77.
46. MCKINLEY, S. C., & NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1996). Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 294-317.
47. MYUNG, I. J., & PITT, M. A. (1997). Applying Occam's razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 79-95.
48. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1983). Information integration and the identification of stimulus noise and criterial noise in absolute judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 299-309.
49. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
50. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 87-109.
51. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1989). Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 279-290.
52. PASHLER, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 469-514.
53. PASHLER, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 1023-1040.
54. PASHLER, H. (1993). Dual-task interference and elementary mental mechanisms. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 245-263). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. PERRIN, N. A., & ASHBY, F. G. (1991). A test of perceptual independence with dissimilarity data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 79-93.
56. POSNER, M. I. (1993). Attention before and during the decade of the brain. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 342-350). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. POSNER, M. I., SANDSON, J., DHAWAN, M., & SHULMAN, G. L. (1989). Is word recognition automatic? A cognitive-anatomical approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 50-60.
58. SHEPARD, R. N. (1957). Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrika, 22, 325-345.
59. SHEPARD, R. N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54-87.
60. SHEPARD, R. N., & CHANG, J. J. (1963). Stimulus generalization in the learning of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 94-102.
61. SHEPARD, R. N., HOVLAND, C. I., & JENKINS, J. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75(13, Whole No. 517).
62. SMITH, J. D., & MINDA, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1411-1436.
63. TAKANE, Y., & SHIBAYAMA, T. (1992). Structures in stimulus identification data. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 335-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. WICKENS, T. D. (1982). Models for behavior: Stochastic processes in psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
65. WILSON, C. J. (1995). The contribution of cortical neurons to the firing pattern of striatal spiny neurons. In J. C. Houk (Ed.), Models of information processing in the basal ganglia (pp. 29-50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.