Response selection processes for conjunctive targets

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 391-411

  Cohen, Asher ^b   Shoup, Rachel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034132662     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.391     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R., & Maddox, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object recognition. Psychological Review, 103, 165-192.
2. Bacon, W., & Egeth, H. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
3. Baylis, G. C., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1993). Visual extinction and stimulus repetition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 453-466.
4. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
5. Briand, K. A. (1998). Feature integration and spatial attention: More evidence of a dissociation between endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1243-1256.
6. Briand, K. A., & Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue": On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 228-241.
7. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
8. Cohen, A. (1993). Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 775-797.
9. Cohen, A. (1999). Multiple levels of response competition: Evidence from the Stroop and Flanker paradigms. Manuscript in preparation.
10. Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1989). Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 650-663.
11. Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. (1991). Density effects in conjunction search: Evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 891-901.
12. Cohen, A., & Magen, H. (1999). Intra-and cross-dimensional visual search for single feature targets. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 291-307.
13. Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. (1993). Orientation asymmetry in the flanker task. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 693-703.
14. Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints on response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
15. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
16. Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., & McClelland, J. L. (1992). A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 239-269.
17. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-553.
18. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., & Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2383-2402.
19. Crick, F. (1984). Function of the thalamic reticular complex: The searchlight hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 81, 4586-4590.
20. Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1991). Target-distractor separation and feature integration in visual attention to letters. Acta Psychologica 76, 101-119.
21. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
22. Duncan, J., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1996). Objects and attributes in divided attention: Surface and boundary systems. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 1076-1084.
23. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32-39.
24. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of three dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review, 98, 335-351.
25. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
26. Eriksen, C. W., & Eriksen, B. A. (1979). Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing? Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 195-205.
27. Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
28. Fournier, L. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Bowd, C. (in press). Multiple feature discrimination faster than single feature discrimination within the same object? Perception and Psychophysics.
29. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
30. Humphreys, G. W., Quinlan, P. T., & Riddoch, M. J. (1989). Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single-and combined-feature targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 258-279.
31. Johnston, J. C., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (1995). Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
32. Kanwisher, N. G. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 404-421.
33. Kanwisher, N. G., Driver, J., & Machado, L. (1995). Spatial repetition blindness is modulated by selective attention to color and shape. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 303-337.
34. Keele, S. W., Cohen, A., Ivry, R., Liotti, M., & Yee, P. (1988). Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 444-452.
35. Klein, R. (1994). Perceptual-motor expectancies interact with covert visual orientation under conditions of endogenous but not exogenous control. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 167-181.
36. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive bias for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
37. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
38. Lavie, N. (1997). Visual feature integration and focused attention: Response competition from multiple distractor features. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 543-556.
39. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 174-207.
40. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
41. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
42. Miller, E. K. (in press). The neural basis of top-down control of visual attention in the prefrontal cortex. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 18). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
44. Miller, J. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 270-288.
45. Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 520-538.
46. Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1993). Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence for coactivation. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 357-366.
47. Mordkoff, J. T., Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1990). Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 157-168.
48. Muller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
49. Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
50. O'Leary, M. J., Barber, P. J., & Simon, J. R. (1994). Does stimulus correspondence account for the Simon effect? Comments on Hasbroucq and Guiard (1991). Psychological Research, 56, 203-209.
51. Palmer, S. E., & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 29-55.
52. Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1023-1040.
53. Pashler, H. (1992). Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at the same time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 44-48.
54. Prinzmetal, W. (1981). Principles of feature integration in visual perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 330-340.
55. Prinzmetal, W. (1995). Visual feature integration in a world of objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 90-94.
56. Prinzmetal, W., Presti, D. E., & Posner, M. I. (1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 361-369.
57. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effect in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
58. Saiki, J., & Hummel, J. E. (1998). Connectedness and the integration of parts with relations in shape perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 227-251.
59. Servan-Schreiber, D. (1993). From physiology to behavior: Computational models of catecholamine modulation of information processing. (Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54 (n4-B), 2264.
60. Shoup, R., Cohen, A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1998). Cross-dimensional interference in a focused attention task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
61. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 2, pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
62. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
63. Tarr, M. J., & Bulthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman & Gerhardstein 1993. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
64. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
65. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
66. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like tweedledum and tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54.
67. Treisman, A. M. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31, 156-177.
68. Treisman, A. M. (1986). Properties, parts and objects. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 1-70). New York: Wiley.
69. Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
70. Treisman, A. M. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178.
71. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
72. Treisman, A. M., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
73. Treisman, A. M., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
74. Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 131-139.
75. van der Heijden, A. H. C., Schreuder, R., Maris, L., & Neerincx, M. (1984). Some evidence for correlated separate activations in simple letter-detection task. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 577-585.
76. Van Essen, D. C., Felleman, D. J., De Yoe, E. A., Olavarria, J., & Knierim, J. (1991). Modular and hierarchical organization of extrastriate visual cortex in the macaque monkey. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 55, 679-696.
77. Vecera, S., & Farah, M. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
78. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
79. Wolfe, J. M., & Cave, K. R. (1990). Deploying visual attention: The guided search model. In T. Troscianko & A. Blake (Eds.), Al and the eye (pp. 79-103). Chichester, England: Wiley.
80. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
81. Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., & Bilsky, A. B. (1994). Parallel processing of part-whole information in visual search tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 537-550.
82. Wolfe, J. M., Stewart, M. I., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Yu, K. P., Shorter, A. D., & Cave, K. R. (1990). Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color × Color and Orientation × Orientation conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 879-892.
83. Yantis, Y., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 135-149.
84. Yeh, Y.-Y., & Eriksen, C. W. (1984). Name codes and features in the discrimination of letter forms. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 225-233.
85. Zorzi, M., & Umilta, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193-205.