Action-based and vision-based selection of input: Two sources of control

Psychological Research

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 247-259

  Magen, Hagit ^a   Cohen, Asher ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RESPONSE TIME; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0346995721     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-002-0099-0     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Behrmann, M. & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Attention accesses multiple reference frames: Evidence from visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 83-101.
2. Cohen, A. (1994). The Stroop effect: Much less robust than it seems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November 11-13, 1994, St. Louis, MI. USA.
3. Cohen (in preparation). The Stroop effect: multiple causes. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Cohen, A., & Feintuch, U. (2002). The Dimensional-Action system: A distinct visual system. In B. Hommel, & W. Prinz (Eds.), Attention & Performance XIX.
5. Cohen, A., Feintuch, U., Gronau, N., & Magen, H. (in preparation). A response-based selection of input. Unpublished manuscript.
6. Cohen, A. & Magen, H. (1999). Intra-and cross-dimensional visual search for single feature targets. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 291-307.
7. Cohen, A, & Shoup, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints on response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
8. Cohen, A, & Shoup, R. (2000). Response selection processes for conjunctive targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 391-411.
9. Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., & McClelland, J. L. (1992). A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 239-269.
10. Craft, J.L., & Simon, J.R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415-420.
11. Dalrymple-Alford, E.C., & Azkoul, J. (1972). The locus of interference in the Stroop and related tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 11, 385-388.
12. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
13. Egeth, H.E., Blecker, D.L., & Kamlet, A.S. (1969). Verbal interference in a perceptual comparison task. Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 355-356.
14. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
15. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
16. Fagot, C. & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058-1079.
17. Feintuch, U., & Cohen, A. (2002). Visual attention and co-activation of response decisions for features from different dimensions. Psychological Science, 13, 362-370.
18. Gronau, N., Ben Shachar, G., & Cohen, A. (in preparation). Significant stimuli do not capture visual attention involuntarily: Further limitations on the role of exogenous attention.
19. Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 102-110.
20. Hommel, B. (1997). Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59, 248-260.
21. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1386-1384.
22. Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation (tutorial). In S. Monsell and J. Driver (Eds.), Control of Cognitive Processes. Attention and Performance XVIII. MIT Press.
23. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Wolfgang, P. (in press). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24.
24. Johnston, J. C., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (1995). Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
25. Keele, S. W. (1972). Attention demands of memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 245-248.
26. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
27. Kramer, A. F. & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
28. Kramer, A. F., Weber, T. A., & Watson, S. E. (1997). Object-based attentional selection - Grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations? Comment on Vecerra and Farah (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 3-13.
29. LaBerge, D. (1994). Quantitative models of attention and response processes in shape identification tasks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 198-243.
30. LaBerge, D., Brown, V., Carter, M., Bash, D., & Hartley, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 17, 65-76.
31. Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
32. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995) The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 174-207.
33. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
34. McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-484.
35. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of human multiple-task performance: The EPIC information-processing architecture and strategic response deferment model. Psychological Review, 104, 1-65.
36. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of human multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory phenomena. Psychological Review, 107, 749-791.
37. Miller, J. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 270-288.
38. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
39. Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1023-1040.
40. Pashler, H. (1992). Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at the same time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 44-48.
41. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
42. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
43. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
44. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
45. Ruthruff, E., Pashler, H. & Klaassen, A. (2001). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement? Psychological Bulletin and Review, 8, 73-80.
46. Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1999). Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 791-814.
47. Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 121, 101-108.
48. Servan-Schreiber, D. (1990). From physiology to behavior: Computational models of catecholamine modulation of information processing. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Pittsburgh, PA.
49. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
50. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
51. Theeuwes, J. & Godijn, R. (in press). Attentional and oculomotor capture. In C.L. Folk and B.S Gibson (Eds.), Attentional capture.
52. Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
53. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
54. Van Seist, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1997). Decision and response in dual-task interference. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 266-307.
55. Yantis, Y., & Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 135-149.