A dissociation between attention and selection

Psychological Science

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 511-515

  Remington, Roger W ^a   Folk, Charles L ^b  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.;

EID: 0035514668     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00394     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cave, K.R., & Wolfe, J.M. (1990). Modelling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
2. Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
3. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
4. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J.E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155-160.
5. Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., & Johnston, J.C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
6. Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., & Wright, J.H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317-329.
7. Friedrich, J., Henik, A., & Tzelgov, J. (1991). Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 792-806.
8. Henik, A., Friedrich, F.J., & Kellog, W. (1983). The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing. Memory & Cognition, 11, 366-373.
9. Henik, A., Friedrich, F.J., Tzelgov, J., & Tramer, S. (1994). Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Memory & Cognition, 22, 157-168.
10. Jiang, Y., Haxby, J.V., Martin, A., Ungerleider, L.G., & Parasuraman, R. (2000). Complementary neural mechanisms for tracking items in human working memory. Science, 287, 643-646.
11. Johnston, J.C., McCann, R.S., & Remington, R.W. (1995). Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
12. Kahneman, D., & Chajcyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497-509.
13. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing news of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D.R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
15. Kramer, A., & Jacobsen, A. (1991). Perceptual organisation and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
16. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
17. Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197.
18. Maruff, P., Danckert, J., Camplin, G., & Currie, J. (1999). Behavioral goals constrain the selection of visual information. Psychological Science, 10, 522-525.
19. Mounts, J.R., & Melara, R.D. (1999). Attention selection of objects or features: Evidence from a modified search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 322-341.
20. Paquet, L. (1992). Global and local processing in nonattended objects: A failure to induce local processing dominance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 512-529.
21. Paquet, L., & Merikle, P.M. (1988). Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 89-100.
22. Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
23. Posner, M.I., & Petersen, S.E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
24. Proctor, R. W. (1978). Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 413-419.
25. Remington, R.W., Folk, C.L., & McLean, J.P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 298-307.
26. Shih, S.-I., & Sperling, G. (1996). Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 758-779.
27. Smith, M.C. (1979). Context facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 239-251.
28. Smith, M.C., Theodor, L., & Franklin, P.E. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 697-712.
29. Sperling, G., Wurst, S.A., & Lu, Z.-L. (1992). Using repetition detection to define and localize the processes of selective attention. In D. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 265-298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Stoltz, J.A., & Besner, D. (1996). Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1166-1177.
31. Theeuwes, J. (1996). Perceptual selectivity for color and form: On the nature of the interference effect. In A.F. Kramer, M.G.H. Coles, & G.D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 297-314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Burger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727-735.
33. Yantis, S., & Egeth, H.E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 661-676.