Effects of ultrasound on cross-flow ultrafiltration of skim milk: CHARACTERIZATION from macro-scale to nano-scale

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 470, Issue , 2014, Pages 205-218

  Jin, Y ^a,b   Hengl, N ^a,b   Baup, S ^a,b   Pignon, F ^a,b   Gondrexon, N ^a,b   Sztucki, M ^c   Gesan Guiziou G ^d   Magnin, A ^a,b   Abyan, M ^a,b   Karrouch, M ^a,b   Bleses D ^a,b  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b Univ Joseph Fourier Grenoble 1   (France)

^c EUROPEAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FACILITY   (France)

^d UMR1253   (France)

Author keywords

Casein micelles; Fouling control; SAXS; Ultrafiltration; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CASEIN; MICELLES; ULTRAFILTRATION; ULTRASONICS;

CASEIN MICELLES; CONCENTRATION PROFILES; CROSS FLOW FILTRATION; CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION; FOULING CONTROL; RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIORS; SAXS; SMALL ANGLE X-RAY SCATTERING;

SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

CASEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSFLOW FILTRATION; FLOW KINETICS; FOULING CONTROL; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MICELLE; MILK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION SCATTERING; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SHEAR RATE; SHEAR STRESS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; STEADY STATE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SUSPENSION; ULTRAFILTRATION; ULTRASOUND; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 84905703252     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.07.043     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Winzeler H.B., Belfort G. Enhanced performance for pressure-driven membrane processes: the argument for fluid instabilities. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80:35-47.
2. Krstić D.M., Tekić M.N., Carić M.D., Milanović S.D. The effect of turbulence promoter on cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208:303-314.
3. Al-Akoum O., Ding L.H., Jaffrin M.Y. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration of UHT skim milk with a vibrating membrane module. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 28:219-234.
4. Akoum O., Jaffrin M.Y., Ding L.-H. Concentration of total milk proteins by high shear ultrafiltration in a vibrating membrane module. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247:211-220.
5. Ding L., Al-Akoum O., Abraham A., Jaffrin M.Y. Milk protein concentration by ultrafiltration with rotating disk modules. Desalination 2002, 144:307-311.
6. Mores W.D., Davis R.H. Yeast-fouling effects in cross-flow microfiltration with periodic reverse filtration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42:130-139.
7. Redkar S., Kuberkar V., Davis R.H. Modeling of concentration polarization and depolarization with high-frequency backpulsing. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 121:229-242.
8. Curcio S., Calabrò V., Iorio G. Monitoring and control of TMP and feed flow rate pulsatile operations during ultrafiltration in a membrane module. Desalination 2002, 145:217-222.
9. Jaffrin M.Y., Gupta B.B., Paullier P. Energy saving pulsatile mode cross flow filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 86:281-290.
10. Cui Z.F., Wright K.I.T. Flux enhancements with gas sparging in downwards crossflow ultrafiltration: performance and mechanism. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 117:109-116.
11. Cui Z.F., Chang S., Fane A. The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 221:1-35.
12. Mercier-Bonin M., Gésan-Guiziou G., Fonade C. Application of gas/liquid two-phase flows during crossflow microfiltration of skimmed milk under constant transmembrane pressure conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 218:93-105.
13. Mercier-Bonin M., Fonade C., Gésan-Guiziou G. Application of gas/liquid two-phase flows during crossflow microfiltration of skimmed milk under constant flux conditions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004, 59:2333-2341.
14. Noordman T.R., de Jonge A., Wesselingh J.A., Bel W., Dekker M., Voorde E.T., et al. Application of fluidised particles as turbulence promoters in ultrafiltration: improvement of flux and rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208:157-169.
15. Vadi P., Rizvi S.S. Experimental evaluation of a uniform transmembrane pressure crossflow microfiltration unit for the concentration of micellar casein from skim milk. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 189:69-82.
16. Piry A., Heino A., Kühnl W., Grein T., Ripperger S., Kulozik U. Effect of membrane length, membrane resistance, and filtration conditions on the fractionation of milk proteins by microfiltration. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:1590-1602.
17. Gésan G., Daufin G., Merin U., Labbé J.-P., Quémerais A. Fouling during constant flux crossflow microfiltration of pretreated whey. Influence of transmembrane pressure gradient. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80:131-145.
18. Brans G., Schroën C.G.P.H., van der Sman R.G.M., Boom R.M. Membrane fractionation of milk: state of the art and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243:263-272.
19. Okahata Y., Noguchi H. Ultrasound-responsive permeability control of bilayer-coated capsule membranes. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1:1517-1520.
20. Lamminen M.O., Walker H.W., Weavers L.K. Effect of fouling conditions and cake layer structure on the ultrasonic cleaning of ceramic membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41:3569-3584.
21. Gonzalez-Avila S.R., Prabowo F., Kumar A., Ohl C.-D. Improved ultrasonic cleaning of membranes with tandem frequency excitation. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415:776-783.
22. Ahmad A.L., Lah N.F.C., Ismail S., Ooi B.S. Membrane antifouling methods and alternatives: ultrasound approach. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2012, 41:318-346.
23. Muthukumaran S., Kentish S.E., Stevens G.W., Ashokkumar M., Mawson R. The application of ultrasound to dairy ultrafiltration: the influence of operating conditions. J. Food Eng. 2007, 81:364-373.
24. Mirzaie A., Mohammadi T. Effect of ultrasonic waves on flux enhancement in microfiltration of milk. J. Food Eng. 2012, 108:77-86.
25. Lamminen M.O., Walker H.W., Weavers L.K. Mechanisms and factors influencing the ultrasonic cleaning of particle-fouled ceramic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 237:213-223.
26. Villamiel M., de Jong P. Influence of high-intensity ultrasound and heat treatment in continuous flow on fat, proteins, and native enzymes of milk. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48:472-478.
27. Masselin I., Chasseray X., Durand-Bourlier L., Lainé J.-M., Syzaret P.-Y., Lemordant D. Effect of sonication on polymeric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 181:213-220.
28. Kallioinen M., Manttari M. Influence of ultrasonic treatment on various membrane materials: a review. Sep. Sci. Technol 2011, 46:1388-1395.
29. Muthukumaran S., Kentish S.E., Ashokkumar M., Stevens G.W. Mechanisms for the ultrasonic enhancement of dairy whey ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 258:106-114.
30. Shanmugam A., Chandrapala J., Ashokkumar M. The effect of ultrasound on the physical and functional properties of skim milk. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012, 16:251-258.
31. Hengl N., Jin Y., Pignon F., Baup S., Mollard R., Gondrexon N., et al. A new way to apply ultrasound in cross-flow ultrafiltration: application to colloidal suspensions. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2014, 21:1018-1025.
32. Jin Y., Hengl N., Baup S., Pignon F., Gondrexon N., Magnin A., et al. Effects of ultrasound on colloidal organization at nanometer length scale during cross-flow ultrafiltration probed by in-situ SAXS. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 453:624-635.
33. Schuck P., Piot M., Méjean S., Le Graet Y., Fauquant J., Brulé G., et al. Déshydratation par atomisation de phosphocaséinate natif obtenu par microfiltration sur membrane. Le Lait 1994, 74:375-388.
34. David C., Pignon F., Narayanan T., Sztucki M., Gesan-Guiziou G., Magnin A. Spatial and temporal in situ evolution of the concentration profile during casein micelle ultrafiltration probed by small-angle X-ray scattering. Langmuir 2008, 24:4523-4529.
35. Magnin A., Piau J.M. Cone-and-plate rheometry of yield stress fluids. Study of an aqueous gel. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 1990, 36:85-108.
36. Narayanan T., Diat O., Bösecke P. SAXS and USAXS on the high brilliance beamline at the ESRF. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2001, 467-468(Part 2):1005-1009.
37. Pignon F., Abyan M., David C., Magnin A., Sztucki M. In situ characterization by SAXS of concentration polarization layers during cross-flow ultrafiltration of laponite dispersions. Langmuir 2012, 28:1083-1094.
38. Pignon F., Alemdar A., Magnin A., Narayanan T. Small-angle X-ray scattering studies of Fe-montmorillonite deposits during ultrafiltration in a magnetic field. Langmuir 2003, 19:8638-8645.
39. Pignon F., Belina G., Narayanan T., Paubel X., Magnin A., Gésan-Guiziou G. Structure and rheological behavior of casein micelle suspensions during ultrafiltration process. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121:8138-8146.
40. Bouchoux A., Debbou B., Gésan-Guiziou G., Famelart M.-H., Doublier J.-L., Cabane B. Rheology and phase behavior of dense casein micelle dispersions. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131:165106.
41. Dahbi L., Alexander M., Trappe V., Dhont J.K.G., Schurtenberger P. Rheology and structural arrest of casein suspensions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 342:564-570.
42. Kromkamp J., Rijnsent S., Huttenhuis R., Schroën K., Boom R. Differential analysis of deposition layers from micellar casein and milk fat globule suspensions onto ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes. J. Food Eng. 2007, 80:257-266.
43. Macosko C.W. Rheology Principles, Measurements, and Applications 1994, VCH, New York.
44. Piau J.M. Carbopol gels: elastoviscoplastic and slippery glasses made of individual swollen sponges: meso- and macroscopic properties, constitutive equations and scaling laws. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 2007, 144:1-29.
45. Bouchoux A., Gésan-Guiziou G., Pérez J., Cabane B. How to squeeze a sponge: casein micelles under osmotic stress, a SAXS study. Biophys. J. 2010, 99:3754-3762.
46. Dalgleish D.G., Corredig M. The structure of the casein micelle of milk and its changes during processing. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 3:449-467.
47. Ferrer M., Alexander M., Corredig M. Does ultrafiltration have a lasting effect on the physico-chemical properties of the casein micelles?. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2011, 91:151-170.
48. de Kruif C. Casein micelle interactions. Int. Dairy J. 1999, 9:183-188.
49. Alexander M., Rojas-Ochoa L.F., Leser M., Schurtenberger P. Structure, dynamics, and optical properties of concentrated milk suspensions: an analogy to hard-sphere liquids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 253:35-46.
50. Sandra S., Cooper C., Alexander M., Corredig M. Coagulation properties of ultrafiltered milk retentates measured using rheology and diffusing wave spectroscopy. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44:951-956.
51. Marchin S., Putaux J.-L., Pignon F., Léonil J. Effects of the environmental factors on the casein micelle structure studied by cryo transmission electron microscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering/ultrasmall-angle X-ray scattering. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126:045101.
52. Shukla A., Narayanan T., Zanchi D. Structure of casein micelles and their complexation with tannins. Soft Matter 2009, 5:2884.
53. Simon A., Penpenic L., Gondrexon N., Taha S., Dorange G. A comparative study between classical stirred and ultrasonically-assisted dead-end ultrafiltration. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2000, 7:183-186.
54. Rabiller-Baudry M., Bégoin L., Delaunay D., Paugam L., Chaufer B. A dual approach of membrane cleaning based on physico-chemistry and hydrodynamics: application to PES membrane of dairy industry. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2008, 47:267-275.
55. Holt C., de Kruif C.G., Tuinier R., Timmins P.A. Substructure of bovine casein micelles by small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2003, 213:275-284.
56. Gebhardt R. Effect of filtration forces on the structure of casein micelles. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2014, 47:29-34.
57. Gebhardt R., Steinhauer T., Meyer P., Sterr J., Perlich J., Kulozik U. Structural changes of deposited casein micelles induced by membrane filtration. Faraday Discuss. 2012, 158:77.
58. Bouchoux A., Qu P., Bacchin P., Gésan-Guiziou G. A general approach for predicting the filtration of soft and permeable colloids: the milk example. Langmuir 2013, 30:22-34.
59. Wemsy Diagne N., Rabiller-Baudry M., Paugam L. On the actual cleanability of polyethersulfone membrane fouled by proteins at critical or limiting flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 425-426:40-47.
60. Delaunay D., Rabiller-Baudry M., Gozálvez-Zafrilla J.M., Balannec B., Frappart M., Paugam L. Mapping of protein fouling by FTIR-ATR as experimental tool to study membrane fouling and fluid velocity profile in various geometries and validation by CFD simulation. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2008, 47:1106-1117.
61. D.-M. Smilgies, P. Busch, C.M. Papadakis, D. Posselt, Characterization of Polymer Thin Films with Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering Under Grazing Incidence (GISAXS), 2002.
62. Gebhardt R., Kulozik U. Simulation of the shape and size of casein micelles in a film state. Food Funct. 2014, 5:780.
63. Jimenez-Lopez A.J.E., Leconte N., Dehainault O., Geneste C., Fromont L., Gésan-Guiziou G. Role of milk constituents on critical conditions and deposit structure in skimmilk microfiltration (0.1μm). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 61:33-43.
64. Jimenez-Lopez A.J.E., Leconte N., Garnier-Lambrouin F., Bouchoux A., Rousseau F., Gésan-Guiziou G. Ionic strength dependence of skimmed milk microfiltration: relations between filtration performance, deposit layer characteristics and colloidal properties of casein micelles. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 369:404-413.