Role of milk constituents on critical conditions and deposit structure in skimmilk microfiltration (0.1 μm)

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 33-43

  Jimenez Lopez, A J E ^a   Leconte, N ^b   Dehainault, O ^b   Geneste, C ^b   Fromont, L ^b   Gesan Guiziou G ^b  

^a La Tremblaye   (France)

^b AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

Critical hydrodynamic conditions; Crossflow microfiltration; Deposit; Milk constituents; Skimmed milk

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; DEPOSITION; HYDRODYNAMICS; MICELLES; MICROFILTRATION;

CRITICAL HYDRODYNAMIC CONDITIONS; CROSSFLOW MICROFILTRATION; MILK CONSTITUENTS; SKIMMED MILK;

CASEIN;

EID: 42249099190     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.09.023     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Brans G., Schroën C.G.P.H., van der Sman R.G.M., and Boom R.M. Membrane fractionation of milk: state of the art and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 243 (2004) 263-272
2. Maubois J.L. New applications of membrane technology in the dairy industry. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 46 (1991) 91-95
3. Maubois J.L., Pierre A., Fauquant J., and Piot M. Industrial fractionation of whey proteins. IDF Bull. 212 (1987) 154-159
4. Pouliot M., Pouliot Y., and Britten M. Characterization of the early stages of fouling during microfiltration of skimmed milk at high tangential velocity. J. Dairy Sci. 74 Suppl. 1 (1991) 131
5. Samuelsson G., Dejmek P., Trägårdh G., and Paulsson M. Minimizing whey protein retention in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk. Int. Dairy J. 7 (1997) 237-242
6. Sachdeva S., and Buchheim W. Separation of native casein and whey proteins during crossflow microfiltration of skim milk. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 52 (1997) 92-97
7. Le Berre O., and Daufin G. Skimmilk crossflow microfiltration performance versus permeation flux to wall shear stress ratio. J. Membr. Sci. 117 (1996) 261-270
8. Gésan-Guiziou G., Boyaval E., and Daufin G. Critical stability conditions in crossflow microfiltration of skimmed milk: transition to irreversible deposit. J. Membr. Sci. 158 (1999) 211-222
9. Chen V., Fane A.G., Madaeni S., and Wenten I.G. Particle deposition during membrane filtration of colloids: transition between concentration polarization and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 125 (1997) 109-122
10. Makardij A., Chen X.D., and Farid M.M. Microfiltration and ultrafiltration of milk: some aspects of fouling and cleaning. Trans. I. ChemE 77(C) (1999) 107-113
11. Vétier C., Bennasar M., and Tarodo de la Fuente B. Etude des interactions entre constituants du lait et membrane minérale de microfiltration. Lait 66 3 (1986) 269-287
12. Vétier C., Bennasar M., and Tarodo de la Fuente B. Study of fouling of a mineral microfiltration membrane using scanning electron microscopy and physicochemical analyses in the processing of milk. J. Dairy Res. 55 (1988) 381-400
13. Attia H., Bennasar M., and Tarodo de la Fuente B. Study of the fouling of inorganic membranes by acidified milks using scanning electron microscopy and electrophoresis. Membrane with pore diameter 0.2 μm. J. Dairy Res. 58 (1991) 39-50
14. Glover F.A., and Brooker B.E. The structure of the deposit formed on the membrane during the concentration of milk by reverse osmosis. J. Dairy Res. 41 (1974) 89-93
15. James B.J., Jing Y., and Chen X.D. Membrane fouling during filtration of milk-a microstructural study. J. Food Eng. 60 (2003) 431-437
16. C. David, F. Pignon, T. Narayanan, M. Sztucki, G. Gésan-Guiziou, A. Magnin, Spatial and temporal in-situ evolution of concentration profile during casein micelle ultrafiltration probed by SAXS, Langmuir (submitted).
17. R.M. Sandblom (Alfa-Laval), Filtering process, Swedish Patent No. 7,416,257 (1974).
18. Gésan-Guiziou G., Daufin G., Boyaval E., and Le Berre O. Wall shear stress: effective parameter for the characterisation of the cross-flow transport in turbulent regime during skimmed milk microfiltration. Lait 79 (1999) 347-354
19. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., and Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 100 (1995) 259-272
20. Aschaffenburg R., and Drewry J. New procedure for the routine determination of the various non casein proteins of milk. Int. Dairy Congr. 3 (1959) 1631-1637
21. Resmini P., Pellegrino L., Andreini R., and Prati F. Determinazione delle sieroproteine solubili del latte per HPLC (cromatographia liquida ad alta prestazione) in fase inversa. Sci. E Technica Latterio-casearia 40 (1989) 7-23
22. Meier J., Klein G.-M., and Kottke V. Crossflow filtration as a new method of wet classification of ultrafine particles. Sep. Purif. Technol. 26 (2002) 43-50
23. O. Le Berre, Microfiltration tangentielle de lait appliquée à la séparation des micelles de caséine des protéines solubles: aspects hydrodynamiques et physico-chimiques, Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Rennes, France.
24. Tunier R., and de Kruif C.G. Stability of casein micelles in milk. J. Chem. Phys. 117 (2002) 1290-1295
25. Kulozik U. Variation of the calcium content in skim milk by diafiltration and ion exchange-effects on permeation rate and structure of deposit layers in RO. J. Membr. Sci. 145 (1998) 91-97
26. Gaucheron F. The minerals of milk. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 45 (2005) 219-270
27. Daufin G., Merin U., Labbé J.P., Quémerais A., and Kerhervé F.L. Cleaning of inorganic membranes after whey and milk ultrafiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38 (1991) 82-89
28. Rabiller-Baudry M., Le Maux M., Chaufer B., and Begoin L. Characterisation of cleaned and fouled membrane by ATR-FTIR and EDX analysis coupled with SEM: application to UF of skimmed milk with a PES membrane. Desalination 146 (2002) 123-128
29. M. Rabiller-Baudry, B. Chaufer, L. Paugam, Chapitre "Nettoyage des équipements à membrane", in: Nettoyage, désinfection et hygiène dans les bio-industries, coordonnateurs J.Y. Leveau, M. Bouix, Tech. et Doc. Lavoisier, 2nd ed., 2007, pp. 1-29.
30. Benaziz L., Barroug A., Legrouri A., Rey C., and Lebugle A. Adsorbtion of O-phospho-l-serine onto poorly crystalline apatite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 238 (2001) 48-53
31. Krstić D.M., Tekić M.N., Carić M.D., and Milanović S.D. Kenics static as turbulence promoter in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk. Sep. Sci. Technol. 38 (2003) 1549-1560
32. Krstić D.M., Tekić M.N., Carić M.D., and Milanović S.D. Kenics static promoter in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk. Desalination 163 (2004) 297-309
33. Mc Donogh R.M., Gruber T., Stroh N., Bauser H., Walitza E., and Chmiel H.H. Criteria for fouling layer disengagement during filtration of feeds containing a wide range of solutes. J. Membr. Sci. 73 (1992) 181-189
34. Bacchin P., Meireles M., and Aimar P. Modelling of filtration: from the polarised layer to deposit formation and compaction. Desalination 145 (2002) 139-146
35. Bacchin P., -Hassen D.S.I., Starov V., Clifton M.J., and Aimar P. A unifying model for concentration polarization, gel layer formation and particle deposition in cross-flow membrane filtration of colloidal suspensions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (2002) 77-91
36. Pignon F., Belina G., Narayanan T., Paubel X., Magnin A., and Gésan-Guiziou G. Structure and rheological behavior of casein micelle suspensions during ultrafiltration process. J. Chem. Phys. 121 (2004) 8138-8146
37. Lu W.M., and Ju S.C. Selective particle deposition in crossflow filtration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 24 (1989) 517-540
38. Kim K.J., Chen V., and Fane A.G. Some factors determining protein aggregation during ultrafiltration. Biotechol. Bioeng. 42 (1993) 260-265
39. Pouliot M., Pouliot Y., Britten M., and Rodrigue N. Microfiltration de lactosérum doux sur membranes d'alumine: influence des conditions hydrodynamiques sur le colmatage. Lait 75 (1995) 117-131
40. Carić M.D., Spasenija D., Milanović D., Krstić D.M., and Tekić M.N. Fouling of inorganic membranes by adsorption of whey proteins. J. Membr. Sci. 165 (2000) 83-88
41. Mourouzidis S.A., and Karabelas A.J. Whey protein fouling of microfiltration ceramic membranes-pressure effects. J. Membr. Sci. 282 (2006) 124-132
42. Gésan G., Daufin G., Merin U., Labbé J.-P., and Quémerais A. Fouling during constant crossflow microfiltration of preheated whey. Influence of transmembrane pressure gradient. J. Membr. Sci. 80 (1993) 131-145