Ecological speciation in mimetic butterflies

BioScience

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 541-548

  Jiggins, Chris D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Heliconius; Pleiotropic effects; Reproductive isolation; Speciation; Sympatry

Indexed keywords

HELICONIUS; HELICONIUS CYDNO; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 45849136368     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1641/B580610     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Bates HW. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae). Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 23: 495-566.
2. Beltrán M. 2004. The speciation history of Heliconius: Inferences from multilocus sequence data. PhD thesis. University College London, London, United Kingdom.
3. Boughman JW. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411: 944-948.
4. Brower AVZ. 1996. A new mimetic species of Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), from southeastern Colombia, revealed by cladistic analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 116: 317-332.
5. _. 2000. On the validity of Heliconius tristero Brower and Heliconius melpomene mocoa Brower, with notes on species concepts in Heliconius Kluk (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 102: 678-687.
6. Brower LP. 1959. Speciation in butterflies of the Papilio glaucus group, II: Ecological relationships and interspecific sexual behavior. Evolution 13: 212-228.
7. Bush GL. 1994. Sympatric speciation in animals: New wine in old bottles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 285-288.
8. Costanzo K, Monteiro A. 2007. The use of chemical and visual cues in female choice in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274: 845-851.
9. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer.
10. Crane J. 1955. Imaginal behaviour of a Trinidad butterfly, Heliconius erato hydara Hewitson, with special reference to the social use of color. Zoologica 40: 167-196.
11. Emelianov I, Dres M, Baltensweiler W, Mallet J. 2001. Host-induced assortative mating in host races of the larch budmoth. Evolution 55: 2002-2010.
12. Estrada C, Jiggins CD. 2002. Patterns of pollen feeding and habitat preference among Heliconius species. Ecological Entomology 27: 448-456.
13. Feder J. 1998. The apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella: Flies in the face of conventional wisdom about speciation? Pages 130-144 in Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Feder JL, Berlocher SH, Roethele JB, Dambroski H, Smith JJ, Perry WL, Gavrilovic V, Filchak KE, Rull J, Aluja M. 2003. Allopatric genetic origins for sympatric host-plant shifts and race formation in Rhagoletis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 10314-10319.
15. Felsenstein J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35: 124-138.
16. Fisher RA. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover.
17. Fordyce JA, Nice CC, Forister ML, Shapiro AM. 2002. The significance of wing pattern diversity in the Lycaenidae: Mate discrimination by two recently diverged species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 871-879.
18. Gavrilets S. 2004. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
19. Grant PR. 1986. Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
20. Heinrich B. 1993. The Hot-Blooded Insects: Strategies and Mechanisms of Thermoregulation. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
21. Jiggins CD, McMillan WO, Neukirchen W, Mallet J. 1996. What can hybrid zones tell us about speciation? The case of Heliconius erato and H. himera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 59: 221-242.
22. Jiggins CD, Linares M, Nasbit RE, Salazar C, Yang ZH, Mallet J. 2001a. Sex-linked hybrid sterility in a butterfly. Evolution 55: 1631-1638.
23. Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J. 2001b. Reproductive isolation caused by color pattern mimicry. Nature 411: 302-305.
24. Jiggins CD, Emelianov I, Mallet J. 2004a. Pleiotropy promotes speciation: Examples from phytophagous moths and mimetic butterflies. Pages 451-473 in Fellowes M, Holloway GJ, Rolff J, eds. Insect Evolutionary Ecology. London: CABI.
25. Jiggins CD, Estrada C, Rodrigues A. 2004b. Mimicry and the evolution of pre-mating isolation in Heliconius melpomene. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 680-691.
26. Jiggins CD, Mallarino R, Willmott KW, Bermingham E. 2006. The phylogenetic pattern of speciation and wing pattern change in Neotropical Ithomia butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution 60: 1454-1466.
27. Joron M, Mallet JLB. 1998. Diversity in mimicry: Paradox or paradigm? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 461-466.
28. Kapan DD. 2001. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of Müllerian mimicry. Nature 409: 338-340.
29. Kirkpatrick M, Barton N. 2006. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173: 419-434.
30. Kronforst M, Young LG, Kapan DD, McNeely C, O'Neill RJ, Gilbert LE. 2006. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 6575-6580.
31. Kronforst M, Young LG, Gilbert LE. 2007. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 278-285.
32. Mallarino R, Bermingham E, Willmott KR, Whinnett A, Jiggins CD. 2005. Molecular systematics of the butterfly genus Ithomia (Lepidoptera: Ithomiinae): A composite phylogenetic hypothesis based on seven genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34: 625-644.
33. Mallet J. 2006. What has Drosophila genetics revealed about speciation? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 186-193.
34. _. 2008. Rapid speciation, hybridization and adaptive radiation in the Heliconiusmel pomene group. In Butlin R, Bride JM, Schluter D, eds. Speciation and Ecology. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press.
35. Mallet J, Barton NH. 1989. Strong natural selection in a warning color hybrid zone. Evolution 43: 421-431.
36. Mallet J, Joron M. 1999. Evolution of diversity in warning color and mimicry: Polymorphisms, shifting balance and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 201-233.
37. Mallet J, McMillan WO, Jiggins CD. 1998. Mimicry and warning color at the boundary between races and species. Pages 390-403 in Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Mavárez J, Salazar C, Bermingham E, Salcedo C, Jiggins CD, Linares M. 2006. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 411: 868-871.
39. Müller F. 1879. Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Transactions of the Entomological of London 1879: xx-xxix.
40. Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Mallet J. 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 268: 1849-1854.
41. Naisbit R, Jiggins CD, Linares M, Salazar C, Mallet J. 2002. Hybrid sterility, Haldane's rule and speciation in Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene. Genetics 161: 1517-1526.
42. Nijhout HF. 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.
43. Nosil P. 2004. Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271: 1521-1528.
44. Nosil P, Vines T, Funk DJ. 2006. Reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 59: 705-719.
45. Podos J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409: 185-188.
46. Puebla O, Bermingham E, Guichard F, Whiteman E. 2007. Color pattern as a single trait driving speciation in Hypoplectrus coral reef fishes? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274: 1265-1271.
47. Rowland HM, Ihalainen E, Lindstrom L, Mappes J, Speed M. 2007. Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences. Nature 448: 64-67.
48. Schluter D. 1998. Ecological speciation in postglacial fishes. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society B 351: 807-814.
49. Schneider CJ, Smith TB, Larison B, Moritz C. 1999. A test of alternative models of diversification in tropical rainforests: Ecological gradients vs. rainforest refugia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96: 13869-13873.
50. Silberglied RE. 1979. Communication in the ultraviolet. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 373-398.
51. Silberglied RE, Taylor OR. 1973. Ultraviolet differences between the sulfur butterflies, Colias eurhtheme and C. philodice, and a possible isolating mechanism. Nature 241: 406-408.
52. Stride GO. 1956. On the courtship behaviour of Hypolimnas misippus L. (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), with notes on the mimetic association with Danaus chrysippus L. (Lepidoptera, Danaidae). British Journal of Animal Behaviour 4: 52-68.
53. _. 1957. Investigations into the courtship behaviour of the male of Hypolimnas misippus L. (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) with special reference to the role of visual stimuli. British Journal of Animal Behaviour 5: 153-167.
54. _. 1958. Further studies on the courtship behaviour of African mimetic butterflies. British Journal of Animal Behaviour 6: 224-230.
55. Vane-Wright RI. 1978. Ecological and behavioural origins of diversity in butterflies. Pages 56-70 in Mound LA, Waloff N, eds. Diversity of Insect Faunas, vol. 9. Oxford (United Kingdom): Blackwell Scientific.
56. Via S. 2002. The ecological genetics of speciation. American Naturalist 159: S1-S7.