Evolutionary active transposable elements in the genome of the coelacanth

Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution

Volumn 322, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 322-333

  Chalopin, Domitille ^a   Fan, Shaohua ^b   Simakov, Oleg ^b,c   Meyer, Axel ^b   Schartl, Manfred ^d   Volff, Jean Nicolas ^a  

^a Univ Lyon 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^c EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coelacanth; Genome landscape; Transposable elements

Indexed keywords

AVES; COELACANTHIDAE; MAMMALIA; TELEOSTEI;

RETROPOSON; TRANSPOSON;

ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; FISH; GENETICS; GENOME; LONG TERMINAL REPEAT; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; RETROPOSON; TRANSPOSON;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FISHES; GENOME; PHYLOGENY; RETROELEMENTS; TERMINAL REPEAT SEQUENCES;

EID: 84905582595     PISSN: 15525007     EISSN: 15525015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.22521     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Alföldi J, Di Palma F, Grabherr M, et al. 2011. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477:587-591.
2. Amemiya CT, Powers TP, Prohaska SJ, et al. 2010. Complete HOX cluster characterization of the coelacanth provides further evidence for slow evolution of its genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:3622-3627.
3. Amemiya CT, Alföldi J, Lee AP, et al. 2013. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496:311-316.
4. Aparicio S, Chapman J, Stupka E, et al. 2002. Whole-genome shotgun assembly and analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes. Science 297:1301-1310.
5. Bejerano G, Lowe CB, Ahituv N, et al. 2006. A distal enhancer and an ultraconserved exon are derived from a novel retroposon. Nature 441:87-90.
6. Biémont C. 2008. Genome size evolution: within-species variation in genome size. Heredity (Edinb) 101:297-298.
7. Böhne A, Brunet F, Galiana-Arnoux D, Schultheis C, Volff JN. 2008. Transposable elements as drivers of genomic and biological diversity in vertebrates. Chromosome Res 16:203-215.
8. Brinkmann H, Venkatesh B, Brenner S, Meyer A. 2004. Nuclear protein-coding genes support lungfish and not the coelacanth as the closest living relatives of land vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:4900-4905.
9. Burch JB, Davis DL, Haas NB. 1993. Chicken repeat 1 elements contain a pol-like open reading frame and belong to the non-long terminal repeat class of retrotransposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8199-8203.
10. Castoe TA, Hall KT, Guibotsy Mboulas ML, et al. 2011. Discovery of highly divergent repeat landscapes in snake genomes using high-throughput sequencing. Genome Biol Evol 3:641-653.
11. Cañestro C, Albalat R. 2012. Transposon diversity is higher in amphioxus than in vertebrates: functional and evolutionary inferences. Brief Funct Genomics 11:131-141.
12. Casane D, Laurenti P. 2013. Why coelacanths are not 'living fossils': a review of molecular and morphological data. Bioessays 35:332-338.
13. Deininger PL, Batzer MA. 1999. Alu repeats and human disease. Mol Genet Metab 67:183-193.
14. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5:113.
15. Eickbush TH, Jamburuthugoda VK. 2008. The diversity of retrotransposons and the properties of their reverse transcriptases. Virus Res 134:221-234.
16. Feschotte C, Pritham EJ. 2007. DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu Rev Genet 41:331-368.
17. Finnegan DJ. 1989. Eukaryotic transposable elements and genome evolution. Trends Genet 5:103-107.
18. Friedman M, Coates MI. 2006. A newly recognized fossil coelacanth highlights the early morphological diversification of the clade. Proc Biol Sci 273:245-250.
19. Gentles AJ, Wakefield MJ, Kohany O, et al. 2007. Evolutionary dynamics of transposable elements in the short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica. Genome Res 17:992-1004.
20. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2010. SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 27:221-224.
21. Haas NB, Grabowski JM, Sivitz AB, Burch JB. 1997. Chicken repeat 1 (CR1) elements, which define an ancient family of vertebrate non-LTR retrotransposons, contain two closely spaced open reading frames. Gene 197:305-309.
22. Haché RJ, Deeley RG. 1988. Organization, sequence and nuclease hypersensitivity of repetitive elements flanking the chicken apoVLDLII gene: extended sequence similarity to elements flanking the chicken vitellogenin gene. Nucleic Acids Res 16:97-113.
23. Han GZ, Worobey M. 2012. An endogenous foamy-like viral element in the coelacanth genome. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002790.
24. Hancks DC, Kazazian HH. 2010. SVA retrotransposons: evolution and genetic instability. Semin Cancer Biol 20:234-245.
25. Hancock JM. 2002. Genome size and the accumulation of simple sequence repeats: implications of new data from genome sequencing projects. Genetica 115:93-103.
26. Hellsten U, Harland RM, Gilchrist MJ, et al. 2010. The genome of the Western clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis. Science 328:633-636.
27. Hollister JD, Gaut BS. 2009. Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression. Genome Res 19:1419-1428.
28. Huang CR, Burns KH, Boeke JD. 2012. Active transposition in genomes. Annu Rev Genet 46:651-675.
29. Ichiyanagi K, Okada N. 2008. Mobility pathways for vertebrate L1, L2, CR1, and RTE clade retrotransposons. Mol Biol Evol 25:1148-1157.
30. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2004. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695-716.
31. Johanson Z, Long JA, Talent JA, Janvier P, Warren JW. 2006. Oldest coelacanth, from the early Devonian of Australia. Biol Lett 2:443-446.
32. Jones FC, Grabherr MG, Chan YF, et al. 2012. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484:55-61.
33. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN, editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press. p 21-132.
34. Jurka J. 2000. Repbase Update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements. Trends Genet 16:418-420.
35. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, et al. 2005. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res 110:462-467.
36. Kaiser VB, van Tuinen M, Ellegren H. 2007. Insertion events of CR1 retrotransposable elements elucidate the phylogenetic branching order in galliform birds. Mol Biol Evol 24:338-347.
37. Kajikawa M, Ohshima K, Okada N. 1997. Determination of the entire sequence of turtle CR1: the first open reading frame of the turtle CR1 element encodes a protein with a novel zinc finger motif. Mol Biol Evol 14:1206-1217.
38. Kasahara M, Naruse K, Sasaki S, et al. 2007. The medaka draft genome and insights into vertebrate genome evolution. Nature 447:714-719.
39. Kazazian HH Jr. 2004. Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science 303:1626-1632.
40. Kojima KK, Jurka J. 2011. Crypton transposons: identification of new diverse families and ancient domestication events. Mob DNA 2:12.
41. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921.
42. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, et al. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438:803-819.
43. Lovšin N, Gubensek F, Kordis D. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics in a novel L2 clade of non-LTR retrotransposons in Deuterostomia. Mol Biol Evol 18:2213-2224.
44. Malik HS, Burke WD, Eickbush TH. 1999. The age and evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements. Mol Biol Evol 16:793-805.
45. Mandal PK, Kazazian HH Jr. 2008. SnapShot: vertebrate transposons. Cell 135:192-192. e1.
46. Meyer A. 1995. Molecular evidence on the origin of tetrapods and the relationships of the coelacanth. Trends Ecol Evol 10:111-116.
47. Meyer A, Dolven SI. 1992. Molecules, fossils, and the origin of tetrapods. J Mol Evol 35:102-113.
48. Meyer A, Wilson AC. 1990. Origin of tetrapods inferred from their mitochondrial DNA affiliation to lungfish. J Mol Evol 31:359-364.
49. Meyer A, Zardoya R. 2003. Recent advances in the (molecular) phylogeny of vertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:311-338.
50. Metcalfe CJ, Filée J, Germon I, Joss J, Casane D. 2012. Evolution of the Australian lungfish (Neoceratodus forsteri) genome: a major role for CR1 and L2 LINE elements. Mol Biol Evol 29:3529-3539.
51. Nishihara H, Smit AF, Okada N. 2006. Functional noncoding sequences derived from SINEs in the mammalian genome. Genome Res 16:864-874.
52. Nobuhisa I, Ogawa T, Deshimaru M, et al. 1998. Retrotransposable CR1-like elements in crotalinae snake genomes. Toxicon 36:915-920.
53. Novick PA, Basta H, Floumanhaft M, McClure MA, Boissinot S. 2009. The evolutionary dynamics of autonomous non-LTR retrotransposons in the lizard Anolis carolinensis shows more similarity to fish than mammals. Mol Biol Evol 26:1811-1822.
54. Novikova OS, Blinov AG. 2009. Origin, evolution, and distribution of different groups of non-LTR retrotransposons among eukaryotes. Genetika 45:149-159.
55. Ogiwara I, Miya M, Ohshima K, Okada N. 2002. V-SINEs: A new superfamily of vertebrate SINEs that are widespread in vertebrate genomes and retain a strongly conserved segment within each repetitive unit. Genome Res 12:316-324.
56. Oliver KR, Greene WK. 2009. Transposable elements: powerful facilitators of evolution. Bioessays 31:703-714.
57. Poulter R, Butler M, Ormandy J. 1999. A LINE element from the pufferfish (fugu) Fugu rubripes which shows similarity to the CR1 family of non-LTR retrotransposons. Gene 227:169-179.
58. Price AL, Jones NC, Pevzner PA. 2005. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 1:i351-i358.
59. Pritham EJ. 2009. Transposable elements and factors influencing their success in eukaryotes. J Hered 100:648-655.
60. Rebollo R, Romanish MT, Mager DL. 2012. Transposable elements: an abundant and natural source of regulatory sequences for host genes. Annu Rev Genet 46:21-42.
61. Schartl M, Walter RB, Shen Y, et al. 2013. The genome of the platyfish, Xiphophorus maculatus, provides insights into evolutionary adaptation and several complex traits. Nature Genet 45:567-572.
62. Shedlock A. 2006. Phylogenomic investigation of CR1 LINE diversity in reptiles. Syst Biol 55:902-911.
63. Sirijovski N, Woolnough C, Rock J, Joss JM. 2005. NfCR1, the first non-LTR retrotransposon characterized in the Australian lungfish genome, Neoceratodus forsteri, shows similarities to CR1-like elements. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 304:40-49.
64. Slotkin RK, Martienssen R. 2007. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat Rev Genet 8:272-285.
65. Smith JLB. 1939. A living fish of Mesozoic type. Nature 143:455-456.
66. Smith JLB. 1956. Old fourlegs: the story of the coelacanth. publisher. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
67. Smith JJ, Sumiyama K, Amemiya CT. 2012. A living fossil in the genome of a living fossil: Harbinger transposons in the coelacanth genome. Mol Biol Evol 29:985-993.
68. Star B, Nederbragt AJ, Jentoft S, et al. 2011. The genome sequence of Atlantic cod reveals a unique immune system. Nature 477:207-210.
69. Stumph WE, Kristo P, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. 1981. A chicken middle-repetitive DNA sequence which shares homology with mammalian ubiquitous repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 9:5383-5397.
70. Sugano T, Kajikawa M, Okada N. 2006. Isolation and characterization of retrotransposition-competent LINEs from zebrafish. Gene 365:74-82.
71. Suh A, Kriegs JO, Donnellan S, Brosius J, Schmitz J. 2012. A universal method for the study of CR1 retroposons in nonmodel bird genomes. Mol Biol Evol 29:2899-2903.
72. Sun C, Shepard DB, Chong RA, et al. 2012. LTR retrotransposons contribute to genomic gigantism in plethodontid salamanders. Genome Biol Evol 4:168-183.
73. Takezaki N, Figueroa F, Zaleska-Rutczynska Z, Takahata N, Klein J. 2004. The phylogenetic relationship of tetrapod, coelacanth, and lungfish revealed by the sequences of forty-four nuclear genes. Mol Biol Evol 21:1512-1524.
74. Thomson KS. 1991. Living fossil: the story of the coelacanth. New York: WW Norton.
75. Vandergon TL, Reitman M. 1994. Evolution of chicken repeat 1 (CR1) elements: evidence for ancient subfamilies and multiple progenitors. Mol Biol Evol 11:886-898.
76. Vieira C, Nardon C, Arpin C, Lepetit D, Biémont C. 2002. Evolution of genome size in Drosophila. Is the invader's genome being invaded by transposable elements? Mol Biol Evol 19:1154-1161.
77. Volff JN, Körting C, Schartl S. 2000. Multiple lineages of the non-LTR retrotransposon Rex1 with varying success in invading fish genomes. Mol Biol Evol 17:1673-1684.
78. Volff JN, Bouneau L, Ozouf-costaz C, Fischer C. 2003. Diversity of retrotransposable elements in compact pufferfish genomes. Trends Genet 19:674-678.
79. Volff JN. 2005. Genome evolution and biodiversity in teleost fish. Heredity (Edinb) 94:280-294.
80. Volff JN. 2006. Turning junk into gold: domestication of transposable elements and the creation of new genes in eukaryotes. Bioessays 28:913-922.
81. Warren WC, Hillier LW, Marshall Graves JA, et al. 2008. Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution. Nature 453:175-183.
82. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420:520-562.
83. Wicker T, Robertson JS, Schulze SR, et al. 2005. The repetitive landscape of the chicken genome. Genome Res 15:126-136.
84. Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A, et al. 2007. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat Rev Genet 8:973-982.
85. Zardoya R, Meyer A. 1996a. The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the African lungfish, Protopterus dolloi, supports its phylogenetic position as a close relative of land vertebrates. Genetics 142:1249-1263.
86. Zardoya R, Meyer A. 1996b. Evolutionary relationships of the coelacanth, lungfishes, and tetrapods based on the 28S ribosomal RNA gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5449-5454.
87. Zardoya R, Meyer A. 1997a. Molecular phylogenetic information on the identity of the closest living relatives(s) of land vertebrates. Naturwissenschaften 84:389-397.
88. Zardoya R, Meyer A. 1997b. The complete DNA sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the "living fossil" the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae. Genetics 146:995-1010.
89. Zardoya R, Cao Y, Hasegawa M, Meyer A. 1998. Searching for the closest living relative(s) of tetrapods through analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data sets. Mol Biol Evol 15:506-517.