Reduced representation approaches to interrogate genome diversity in large repetitive plant genomes

Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 257-267

  Hirsch, Cory D ^a   Evans, Joseph ^b   Buell, C Robin ^b   Hirsch, Candice N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Exome capture; Genome diversity; Re sequencing; RNA Seq

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; CROP; ECONOMICS; EXOME; FOOD SECURITY; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; INDEL MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENOME; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPECIES DIVERSITY; GENE DELETION; GENE INSERTION; GENOTYPE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS;

DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; GENOME, PLANT; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84905090589     PISSN: 14739550     EISSN: 14774062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elt051     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000;408:796-815.
2. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan T-H, et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science 2002;296: 92-100.
3. Yu J, Hu S, Wang J, et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science 2002;296: 79-92.
4. The International Rice Genome Sequencing Consortium. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 2005; 436:793-800.
5. Kawahara Y, de la Bastide M, Hamilton J, et al. Improvement of the Oryza sativa Nipponbare reference genome using next generation sequence and optical map data. Rice 2013;6:4.
6. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 2009;326:1112-5.
7. SanMiguel P, Gaut BS, Tikhonov A, etal. The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize. Nat Genet 1998;20: 43-5.
8. Schatz M, Witkowski J, McCombie WR. Current challenges in de novo plant genome sequencing and assembly. Genome Biol 2012;13:243.
9. Bakel HV, Stout JM, Cote AG, et al. The draft genome and transcriptome of Cannabis sativa. Genome Biol 2011;12:R102. http://genomebiology.com/2011/12/10/r102 (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
10. Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S, et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 2006;313:1596-604.
11. Ming R, Hou S, Feng Y, et al. The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature 2008;452:991-6.
12. Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature 2011; 475:189-95.
13. Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A, et al. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 2013;497:579-84.
14. Luo MC, Deal KR, Akhunov ED, et al. Genome comparisons reveal a dominant mechanism of chromosome number reduction in grasses and accelerated genome evolution in Triticeae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:15780-5.
15. Morrell PL, Buckler ES, Ross-Ibarra J. Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13: 85-96.
16. Duan J, Zhang J-G, Deng H-W, et al. Comparative studies of copy number variation detection methods for nextgeneration sequencing technologies. PLoS One 2013;8: e59128.
17. Lai J, Li R, Xu X, et al. Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation among elite maize inbred lines. Nat Genet 2010;42: 1027-30.
18. McHale LK, Haun WJ, Xu WW, et al. Structural variants in the soybean genome localize to clusters of biotic stressresponse genes. Plant Physiol 2012;159:1295-308.
19. Mace ES, Tai SS, Gilding EK, etal. Whole-genome sequencing reveals untapped genetic potential in Africa's indigenous cereal crop sorghum. Nat Commun 2013;4:2320.
20. Korte A, Farlow A. The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 2013;9:29.
21. Atwell S, Huang YS, Vilhjálmsson BJ, et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 2010;465:627-31.
22. Wang M, Jiang N, Jia T, et al. Genome-wide association mapping of agronomic and morphologic traits in highly structured populations of barley cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 2012;124:233-46.
23. Li H, Peng Z, Yang X, et al. Genome-wide association study dissects the genetic architecture of oil biosynthesis in maize kernels. Nat Genet 2013;45:43-50.
24. Huang X, Zhao Y, Wei X, et al. Genome-wide association study of flowering time and grain yield traits in a worldwide collection of rice germplasm. Nat Genet 2012;44:32-9.
25. Ranc N, Munos S, Xu J, et al. Genome-wide association mapping in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Is possible using genome admixture of Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme. G3 2012;2:853-64.
26. Hufford MB, Xu X, van Heerwaarden J, et al. Comparative population genomics of maize domestication and improvement. Nat Genet 2012;44:808-11.
27. Xu X, Liu X, Ge S, et al. Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:105-11.
28. Lam H-M, Xu X, Liu X, etal. Resequencing of 31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifies patterns of genetic diversity and selection. Nat Genet 2010;42:1053-9.
29. Kumar S, Banks TW, Cloutier S. SNP discovery through next-generation sequencing and its applications. Int J Plant Genomics 2012;2012:831460. http://www.hindawi.com/ journals/ijpg/2012/831460/ (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
30. Treangen TJ, Salzberg SL. Repetitive DNA and nextgeneration sequencing: computational challenges and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13:36-46.
31. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ, Price HJ, et al. Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (approximately 100 Mb) and Drosophila (approximately 175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be approximately 157 Mb and thus approximately 25% larger than the Arabidopsis genome initiative estimate of approximately 125 Mb. Ann Bot 2003;91:547-57.
32. Tomato Genome Consortium. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 2012;485:635-41.
33. Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010;463:178-83.
34. Ng SB, Turner EH, Robertson PD, et al. Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature 2009;461:272-6.
35. Bamshad MJ, Ng SB, Bigham AW, et al. Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:745-55.
36. Marian AJ. Molecular genetic studies of complex phenotypes. Transl Res 2012;159:64-79.
37. Veltman JA, Brunner HG. Applications of next-generation sequencing de novo mutations in human genetic disease. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13:565-75.
38. Hodges E, Xuan Z, Balija V, et al. Genome-wide in situ exon capture for selective resequencing. Nat Genet 2007; 39:1522-7.
39. Okou DT, Steinberg KM, Middle C, et al. Microarraybased genomic selection for high-throughput resequencing. Nat Methods 2007;4:907-9.
40. Gnirke A, Melnikov A, Maguire J, et al. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 2009;27:182-9.
41. Bainbridge MN, Wang M, Burgess DL, et al. Whole exome capture in solution with 3 Gbp of data. Genome Biol 2010;11:R62. http://genomebiology.com/2010/11/6/ R62 (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
42. Albert TJ, Molla MN, Muzny DM, et al. Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization. Nat Methods 2007;4:903-5.
43. Fairfield H, Gilbert GJ, Barter M, et al. Mutation discovery in mice by whole exome sequencing. GenomeBiol 2011; 12:R86. http://genomebiology.com/2011/12/9/R86 (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
44. Fu Y, Springer NM, Gerhardt DJ, et al. Repeat subtractionmediated sequence capture from a complex genome. Plant J 2010;62:898-909.
45. Haun WJ, Hyten DL, Xu WW, et al. The composition and origins of genomic variation among individuals of the soybean reference cultivar Williams 82. Plant Physiol 2011; 155:645-55.
46. Mascher M, Richmond TA, Gerhardt DJ, et al. Barley whole exome capture: a tool for genomic research in the genus Hordeum and beyond. Plant J 2013;76:494-505.
47. Saintenac C, Jiang DY, Akhunov ED. Targeted analysis of nucleotide and copy number variation by exon capture in allotetraploid wheat genome. Genome Biol 2011;12: http://genomebiology.com/2011/12/9/R88 (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
48. Zhou LC, Holliday JA. Targeted enrichment of the black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) gene space using sequence capture. BMC Genomics 2012;13:703.
49. Neves LG, Davis JM, Barbazuk WB, et al. Whole-exome targeted sequencing of the uncharacterized pine genome. PlantJ 2013;75:146-56.
50. Winfield MO, Wilkinson PA, Allen AM, et al. Targeted re-sequencing of the allohexaploid wheat exome. Plant BiotechnolJ 2012;10:733-42.
51. Bundock PC, Casu RE, Henry RJ. Enrichment of genomic DNA for polymorphism detection in a nonmodel highly polyploid crop plant. Plant Biotechnol J 2012; 10:657-67.
52. Park G, Gim J, Kim A, et al. Multiphasic analysis of whole exome sequencing data identifies a novel mutation of ACTG1 in a nonsyndromic hearing loss family. BMC Genomics 2013;14:191. http://www.biomedcentral.com/ 1471-2164/14/191 (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
53. Love MI, Mysickova A, Sun RP, et al. Modeling read counts for CNV detection in exome sequencing data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2011;10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC3517018/ (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
54. Sathirapongsasuti JF, Lee H, Horst BAJ, et al. Exome sequencing-based copy-number variation and loss of heterozygosity detection: ExomeCNV. Bioinformatics 2011;27: 2648-54.
55. Deng XT. SeqGene: a comprehensive software solution for mining exome- and transcriptome-sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12:267. http://www.biomedcentral. com/1471-2105/12/267 (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
56. Huang X, Feng Q, Qian Q, et al. High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res 2009; 19:1068-76.
57. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, et al. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 2008;3:e3376.
58. Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, et al. Genomewide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using nextgeneration sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:499-510.
59. Chutimanitsakun Y, Nipper R, Cuesta-Marcos A, et al. Construction and application for QTL analysis of a restriction site associated DNA (RAD) linkage map in barley. BMC Genomics 2011;12:4.
60. Barchi L, Lanteri S, Portis E, et al. A RAD tag derived marker based eggplant linkage map and the location of QTLs determining anthocyanin pigmentation. PLoS One 2012;7:e43740.
61. Hegarty M, Yadav R, Lee M, et al. Genotyping by RAD sequencing enables mapping of fatty acid composition traits in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne (L.)). Plant Biotechnol J 2013;11:572-81.
62. Pfender WF, Saha MC, Johnson EA, et al. Mapping with RAD (restriction-site associated DNA) markers to rapidly identify QTL for stem rust resistance in Loliumperenne.Theor Appl Genet 2011;122:1467-80.
63. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 2011;6:e19379. http://www. plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal. pone.0019379 (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
64. Deschamps S, Llaca V, May GD. Genotyping-bysequencing in plants. Biology 2012;1:460-83.
65. Poland JA, Brown PJ, Sorrells ME, et al. Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach. PLoS One 2012;7:e32253.
66. Lu F, Lipka AE, Glaubitz J, et al. Switchgrass genomic diversity, ploidy, and evolution: novel insights from a network-based SNP discovery protocol. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003215.
67. Crossa J, Beyene Y, Kassa S, et al. Genomic prediction in maize breeding populations with genotyping-by-sequencing. G3 2013;3:1903-26, http://www.g3journal.org/con tent/early/2013/09/05/g3.113.008227.abstract (02 January 2014, date last accessed).
68. Tian F, Bradbury PJ, Brown PJ, et al. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet 2011;43:159-62.
69. Gore MA, Chia JM, Elshire RJ, et al. A first-generation haplotype map of maize. Science 2009;326:1115-7.
70. Myles S, Chia JM, Hurwitz B, et al. Rapid genomic characterization of the genus Vitis. PLoS One 2010;5:e8219.
71. Spindel J, Wright M, Chen C, etal. Bridging the genotyping gap: using genotyping by sequencing (GBS) to add highdensity SNP markers and new value to traditional bi-parental mapping and breeding populations. Theor Appl Genet 2013;126:2699-716.
72. Liu S, Yeh CT, Tang HM, et al. Gene mapping via bulked segregant RNA-Seq (BSR-Seq). PLoS One 2012;7:e36406.
73. Hansey CN, Vaillancourt B, Sekhon RS, et al. Maize (Zea mays L.) genome diversity as revealed by RNA-sequencing. PLoS One 2012;7:e33071.
74. Hamilton JP, Hansey CN, Whitty BR, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in elite North American potato germplasm. BMC Genomics 2011;12:302.
75. Hamilton JP, Sim S-C, Stoffel K, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in cultivated tomato via sequencing by synthesis. Plant Genome 2012;5:17-29.
76. Yang SS, Tu ZJ, Cheung F, et al. Using RNA-Seq for gene identification, polymorphism detection and transcript profiling in two alfalfa genotypes with divergent cell wall composition in stems. BMC Genomics 2011;12:199.
77. Li X, Acharya A, Farmer A, et al. Prevalence of single nucleotide polymorphism among 27 diverse alfalfa genotypes as assessed by transcriptome sequencing. BMC Genomics 2012;13:568.
78. Xia Z, Xu H, Zhai J, et al. RNA-Seq analysis and de novo transcriptome assembly of Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Mol Biol 2011;77:299-308.
79. Meyer E, Logan TL, Juenger TE. Transcriptome analysis and gene expression atlas for Panicum hallii var. filipes, a diploid model for biofuel research. Plant J 2012; 70:879-90.
80. Haseneyer G, Schmutzer T, Seidel M, etal. From RNA-Seq to large-scale genotyping-genomics resources for rye (Secale cereale L.). BMC Plant Biol 2011;11:131.
81. Gongora-Castillo E, Fedewa G, Yeo Y, et al. Genomic approaches for interrogating the biochemistry of medicinal plant species. Methods Enzymol 2012;517:139-59.
82. Góngora-Castillo E, Childs KL, Fedewa G, et al. Development of transcriptomic resources for interrogating the biosynthesis of monoterpene indole alkaloids in medicinal plant species. PLoS One 2012;7:e52506.
83. Felcher KJ, Coombs JJ, Massa AN, et al. Integration of two diploid potato linkage maps with the potato genome sequence. PLoS One 2012;7:e36347.
84. Hirsch CN, Hirsch CD, Felcher K, et al. Retrospective view of North American potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) breeding in the 20th and 21st centuries. G3 2013;3:1003-13.
85. Manrique-Carpintero NC, Tokuhisa JG, Ginzberg I, et al. Sequence diversity in coding regions of candidate genes in the glycoalkaloid biosynthetic pathway of wild potato species. G3 2013;3:1467-79.
86. Hackett CA, McLean K, Bryan GJ. Linkage analysis and QTL mapping using SNP dosage data in a tetraploid potato mapping population. PLoS One 2013;8:e63939.
87. Sim SC, Durstewitz G, Plieske J, et al. Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato. PLoS One 2012;7:e40563.
88. Majewski J, Pastinen T. The study of eQTL variations by RNA-Seq: from SNPs to phenotypes. Trends Genet 2011;27: 72-9.
89. Gan X, Stegle O, Behr J, et al. Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2011;477: 419-23.
90. Delker C, Quint M. Expression level polymorphisms: heritable traits shaping natural variation. Trends Plant Sci 2011; 16:481-8.