Foundations of a sociocultural perspective on teacher performance assessment

Designing Performance Assessment Systems for Urban Teacher Preparation

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 19-44

  Conway, Paul F ^a,b   Artiles, Alfredo J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904834096     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612991     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Allal, L., & Pelgrimes Ducrey, G. (2000). Assessment of-or in-the zone of proximal development. Learning & Instruction, 10, 137-152.
2. Ambach, G. (1996). Standards for teachers: Potential for improving practice. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), 207-10.
3. Amrein, A.L., & Berliner, D.C. (2002, March 28). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved July 3, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10nl8/
4. Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum. Journal of Education, 168, 61-80.
5. Artiles, A.J. (1996). Teacher thinking in urban schools: Toward a contextualized research agenda. In F.Ríos (Ed.), Teacher thinking in cultural contexts (pp. 23-52, 355-363). New York: SUNY Press.
6. Artiles, A.J., Gutierrez, K., & Rueda, R. (2002, April). Teacher education in a culturally diverse inclusive era: Implications of a cultural historical vision for teacher learning research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
7. Artiles, A.J., Trent, S.C., Hoffman-Kipp, P., & López-Torres, L. (2000). From individual acquisition to cultural-historical practices in multicultural teacher education. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 79-89.
8. Berliner, D.C., & Biddle, B.J. (1996). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools. New York: Perseus Press.
9. Bernstein, B. (Ed.). (1971-1977). Class, codes and control (Vols. 1-3). London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10. Bernstein, B. (1982). Codes, modalities and the processes of cultural production: A model. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
11. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.
12. Brown, A.L., & Ferrara, R.A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J.Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition (pp. 272-305). New York:Cambridge University Press.
13. Brown, A.L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J.C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G.Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188-228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Bruno, J.E. (2002, July 26). The geographical distribution of teacher absenteeism in large urban school district settings: Implications for school reform efforts aimed at promoting equity and excellence in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(32). Retrieved July 3, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n32/
16. Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Clark, C.M. (1995). Thoughtful teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Clark, C.M., & Peterson, P.L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M.C. Wittock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296)). New York:Macmillan.
19. Claxton, G., & Wells, G. (Eds.). (2002). Learning for life in the 21st century:Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Cochran-Smith, M. (2001, April 2). Constructing outcomes in teacher education:Policy, practice and pitfalls. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 9(11). Retrieved July 5, 2003 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n11-.html
21. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
22. Cole, M., & Wertsch, J.V. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antimony in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39(5), 250-256.
23. Conway, P.F. (2002). Learning in communities of practice: Rethinking teaching and learning in disadvantaged contexts. Irish Educational Studies, 21(3), 61-92.
24. Conway, P.F., & Clark, C.M. (2003). The journey inward and outward: Areexamination of Fuller's concerns-based model of teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(5), 465-482.
25. Conway, P.F., Goodell, J., & Carl, J. (2002). Educational reform in the United States:Politics, purposes, and processes. In R.Griffin (Ed.), Education in transition:International perspectives on the politics and processes of change (pp. 83-108). London: Symposium Books.
26. CREDE. (2002, March). Research evidence five standards for effective pedagogy and student outcomes. (Technical Report No. G1). Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence. http://www.crede.ucsc.edu/research/pdd/5stand_evidence.html
27. Curry, S., & Cruz, J. (2000). Portfolio-based teacher assessment. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 29(3), 34-37.
28. Dalton, S.S. (1998). Pedagogy matters: Standards for effective teaching practice (Research Rep. No. 4). Washington, DC & Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence, http://www.crede.ucsc.edu/products/print/reports.html
29. Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge/Falmer.
30. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Who will speak for the children? How "Teach for America" hurts urban schools and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(1), 21-34.
31. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED415183:75)
32. Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523-545.
33. Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. (2004). Political rationales and ideological stances of the standards-based reform of teacher education in the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 1-15.
34. Doherty, R.W., Hilberg, R.S., Epaloose, G., & Tharp, R.G. (2002). Development and validation of the Standards Performance Continuum: A performance-based measure of the Standards for Effective Pedagogy. Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R.Miettinen, & R.-L.Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Englert, C.S., Tarrant, K.L., & Mariage, T.V. (1992). Defining and redefining instructional practice in special education: Perspectives on good teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15(2), 62-86.
38. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Rosaen, C. (Eds.). (1997). Guiding teacher learning: Insider studies of classroom work with prospective & practicing teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED408278:113)
39. Gadamer, H.G. (1987). The problem of historical consciousness. In P.Rabinow & W. M.Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social science: A second look (pp. 82-140). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1963)
40. Gipps, C.V. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In A.Iran-Nejad & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 335-392). Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association.
41. Gipps, C.V. (2002). Sociocultural perspectives on assessment. In G.Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 73-83). Oxford:Blackwell.
42. Good, T.L., & Brophy, J.E. (1986). School effects. In M.C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 570-602). New York: Macmillan.
43. Hoffman-Kipp, P., Artiles, A.J., & López-Torres, L. (in press). Beyond reflection:Teacher learning as praxis. Theory into Practice.
44. Jackson, P.W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
45. Kozol, J. (1992). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York:HarperCollins.
46. Krei, M.S. (1998). Intensifying the barriers: The problem of inequitable teacher allocation in low-income urban schools. Urban Education, 33(1), 71-94.
47. Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Teaching in dangerous times: Culturally relevant approaches to teacher assessment. Journal of Negro Education, 67(3), 255-67.
48. Leont'ev, A.N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J.V.Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-71). Armonk, NY:M.E.Sharpe.
49. Linn, R.L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
50. Means, B., Chelemer, C., & Knapp, M.S. (Eds.). (1991). Teaching advanced skills to at-risk students: Views from research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Mehrens, W.A. (1992). Using performance assessment for accountability purposes. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(1), 3-9, 20.
52. Moll, L. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of socio-historical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Moss, P.A. (1998). Rethinking validity for the assessment of teaching. In N.Lyons (Ed.), With portfolio in hand: Validating the new teacher professionalism (pp. 202-219). New York: Teachers College Press.
54. Nakkula, M.J., & Ravitch, S.M. (1998). Matters of interpretation: Reciprocal transformation in therapeutic and developmental relationships with youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Oakes, J. (1986). Tracking, inequality, and the rhetoric of school reform: Why schools don't change. Journal of Education, 168(1), 60-80.
56. Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (1999). Teaching to change the world. Boston: McGraw-Hill College.
57. Padron, Y.N., & Waxman, H.C. (1999). Classroom observations of the five standards of effective teaching in urban classrooms with English language learners. Teaching and Change, 7(1), 79-100.
58. Pecheone, R.L., & Stansbury, K. (1996). Connecting teacher assessment and school reform. Elementary School Journal, 97(2), 163-77.
59. Porter, A.C., Youngs, P., & Odden, A. (2001). Advances in teacher assessments and their uses. In V.Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 259-297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
60. Raudenbush, S.W. (1988). Educational applications of hierarchical linear models: A review. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13(2), 85-116.
61. Raudenbush, S.W. (1993). Hierarchical linear models and experimental design. In L.K.Edwards (Ed.), Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science (pp. 459-496). New York: Marcel Dekker.
62. Rogoff, B. (1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice build on each other. In E.Amsel & K.A.E.Renninger (Eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, application, and method (pp. 265-285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Shepard, L. (1991). Psycometrician's beliefs about teaching. Educational Researcher, 20(7), 2-16.
64. Shepel, E.N.L. (1995). Teacher self-identification in culture from Vygotsky's developmental perspective. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26, 425-442.
65. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
66. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Assessment for teaching: An initiative for the profession. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(1), 38-44.
67. Shulman, L.S. (1988). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of educational reform. Educational Leadership, 46(3), 36-41.
68. Tharp, R.G. (1997). From at-risk to excellence: Research, theory, and principles for practice. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence.
69. Tharp, R.G., Estrada, P., Dalton, S.S., & Yamauchi, L. (2000). Teaching transformed:Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
70. Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
71. Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1989). Rousing schools to life. American Educator, 13(2), 20-25, 46-52.
72. Trent, S.C., & Artiles, A.J. (Eds.). (1998). Multicultural teacher education in special and bilingual education: Exploring multiple measurement strategies to assess teacher learning [Special issue]. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 2-58.
73. Tudge, J. (1992). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for classroom practice. In L.C.Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (155-172). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
74. Tudge, J., Putnam, S., & Valsiner, J. (1996). Culture and cognition in developmental perspective. In R.B.Cairns, G.H.J.Elder, & E.J.Costello (Eds.), Developmental science (190-222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
75. Valencia, R.R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: educational thought and practice. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
76. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-78.
77. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Wayne, A.J. (2002, June 13). Teacher inequality: New evidence on disparities in teachers' academic skills. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(30). Retrieved July 3, 2003 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n30/
79. Wertsch, J.V. (1985a). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
80. Wertsch, J.V. (1985b). The semiotic mediation of mental life: L.S.Vygotsky & M.M. Bakhtin. In E.Mertz & R.J.Parmentier (Eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives (49-69). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
81. Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
82. Zvoch, K., & Stevens, J.J. (2003, July 8). A multi-level, longitudinal analysis of middle school math and language achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(20). Retrieved July 9, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n20/