Connecting Teacher Assessment and School Reform

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 1996, Pages

  Pecheone, Raymond L ^a   Stansbury, Kendyll ^a  

^a The Connecticut State Department of Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038405283     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/461860     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Armour-Thomas, E., & Szczesiul, E. (n.d.). A review of the knowledge base of the Connecticut Competency Instrument. (Available from Connecticut State Department of Education, P.O. Box 2219, Room 369, Hartford, CT 06145)
2. Ball, D. (1990). Reflections and deflections of policy: The case of Carol Turner. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 247-260.
3. Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mostenthal, P., & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.). (1991). Handbook of reading research (Vols. 1 & 2). White Plains, NY: Longman.
4. Brophy, J. E. (1988). Research on teaching effectiveness. Elementary School Journal, 89, 3-21.
5. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3d ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
6. Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
7. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. (1993). Rational numbers: An integration of research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cohen, D. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 311-330.
9. Collins, A. (1991). Portfolios for biology teacher assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5, 147-167.
10. Connecticut State Department of Education. (1995). Elementary teaching standards. Hartford, CT: Author.
11. Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. (1994). Dance, music, theatre, visual arts: What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
12. Darling-Hammond, L. (1993a). Moving toward performance-based licensing in teaching: Next steps. Washington, DC: Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium, Council of Chief State School Officers.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (1993b). Reframing the school agenda: Developing capacity for school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 753-761.
14. Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, T. (1994). Capturing teachers' knowledge: Performance assessment a) and post-structuralist epistemology, b) from a post-structuralist perspective, c) and post-structuralism, e) none of the above. Educational Researcher, 23, 11-18.
15. Educational Testing Service, (n.d.). Praxis series: Professional assessments for beginning teachers®. Princeton, NJ: Author.
16. Fullan, M (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue (draft). Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
19. Kugliowoski, B., Holdzkom, D., & French, R. (1993). Teacher performance evaluation in the Southeastern states: Forms and functions. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 335-358.
20. Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R., & Hattrup, R. (1992). Analysis of arithmetic for elementary teaching. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Linn, R. (1994). Performance assessment: Policy promises and technical measurement. Educational Researcher, 23, 4-14.
22. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129-151.
23. Lomask, M., Pecheone, R., & Baron, J. (1995). Assessing new science teachers. Educational Leadership, 52, 62-65.
24. Mason, T. (1996). Why assess teaching? Elementary School Journal 97, 101-104.
25. Medley, D. M., Coker, H., & Soares, R. S. (1984). Measurement-based evaluation of teacher performance: An empirical approach. New York: Longman.
26. Moss, P. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62, 229-258.
27. Moss, P. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher, 25, 20-28, 43.
28. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NEPTS). (1990). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession (2d ed.). Detroit: Author.
29. National Council for the Social Studies. (1993). A vision of powerful teaching and learning in the social studies: Building social understanding and civic efficacy. Social Education, 57, 213-223.
30. National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.
31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
33. O'Neal, J., Stansbury, K., & Rigazio-DiGilio, T. (1995). Toward a vision of elementary teaching and learning. Hartford: Connecticut State Department of Education.
34. Porter, A. (1988). Understanding teaching: A model for assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(14), 2-7.
35. Shulman, L. (1987a). Assessment for teaching: An initiative for the profession. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 38-44.
36. Shulman, L. (1987b). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
37. Simon, H. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-202.
38. Spiro, R. (1993, April). Theoretical issues in situation-sensitive construction of under standing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
39. Stansbury, K., & Long, C. (1992). Summary evaluations of innovative assessment methods. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
40. Tomala, G., & Weinland, T. (1991). Social studies: Connecticut's teacher assessment center exercises. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5, 191-204.
41. Tyson, P., & Reynolds, A. (1989). Topic sequencing (math) (Technical Rep. no. M3). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Teacher Assessment Project.
42. Wilson, S. (1990). A conflict of interests: The case of Mark Black. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 293-310.
43. Wineburg, S., & Kerdeman, D. (1989). Exercise prototype: The analysis of textbooks in history (Technical Rep. no. H-7). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Teacher Assessment Project.