Political rationales and ideological stances of the standards-based reform of teacher education in the US

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-15

  Delandshere, Ginette ^a   Petrosky, Anthony ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum alignment; Equity; Globalization; Reform policy; Standards based reform; Teacher assessment; Teacher autonomy; Teacher education; Teacher knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347568423     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2003.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ball S.J. Educational reform: A critical and post-structural approach 1994 Open University Press Bristol, PA
2. Bull B. National standards in local context: A philosophical and policy analysis In Jones B.A. (Ed.), Educational leadership: Policy dimensions in the 21st century 2000 Ablex Publishing Corporation Stamford, CT
3. Bullock A.A. Hawk P.P. Developing a teaching portfolio: A guide for preservice and practicing teachers 2001 Merrill Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
4. Burbules N.C. Torres C.A. (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives 2000 Routledge New York, NY
5. Campbell D.M. Melenyzer B.J. Nettles D.H. Wyman R.M. Portfolio and performance assessment in teacher education 2001 Allyn & Bacon Boston
6. Cochran-Smith M. Fries M.K. The discourse of reform in teacher education: Extending the dialogue Educational Researcher 31 6 2002 26-28
7. Cole D.J. Ryan C.W. Kick F. Mathies B.K. Portfolios across the curriculum and beyond 2nd ed. 2000 Corwin Thousand Oaks, CA
8. Council of Chief School State Officers (CCSSO), (2002). Key state education policies on k-12 education. Available: http://www.ccsso.org/pdfs/keystate2002.pdf.
9. Cuban L. How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure Teachers College Record 99 3 1998 453-477
10. Darling-Hammond L. Reshaping teaching policy, preparation, and practice: Influences of the national board for professional teaching standards 1999 American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Washington, DC
11. Darling-Hammond L. How teacher education matters Journal of Teacher Education 51 3 2000 166-173
12. Darling-Hammond L. Wise A. Klein S.P. A license to teach: Raising standards for teaching 1999 Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco, CA
13. Delandshere G. Arens S. Representations of teaching in standards-based reform: Are we closing the debate about teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education 17 5 2001 547-566
14. Delandshere G. Arens S. Examining the quality of the evidence in pre-service teacher portfolios Journal of Teacher Education 54 1 2003 57-73
15. Delandshere G. Petrosky A. Capturing teachers' knowledge: Performance assessment (a) and post-structuralist epistemology, (b) from a post-structuralist perspective, (c) and post-structuralism, (d) none of the above Educational Researcher 23 5 1994 11-18
16. Delandshere G. Petrosky A. Assessment of complex performances: Limitations of key measurement assumptions Educational Researcher 27 2 1998 14-24
17. Delandshere G. Petrosky A. It is also possible to quantify colors but that is not the point: A rejoinder to Brookhart Educational Researcher 28 3 1999 28-30
18. Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. (2001). Framing teaching and teachers? National Board English language arts certification in the US. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 1 (pp. 115-133). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Doecke, B. (2002). Professional identity and educational reform: Challenges for teacher education in Australia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, New Orleans.
20. The Future Project. (2000, October). Policy for higher education in a changing world: The universal impact of competition and globalization in higher education. Brown University, Providence, RI. Available: http://www.futuresproject.org.
21. Garm, N., & Karlsen, G. (2002). Teacher education reform in Europe: The case of Norway: trends and tensions in a global perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, New Orleans.
22. Grant S.G. A policy at odds with itself Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 15 1 1997 92-113
23. House E.R. The dominion of economic accountability Educational Forum 37 1 1972 13-23
24. Howe K.R. Understanding equal educational opportunity: Social justice, democracy, and schooling 1997 Teachers College Press New York
25. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Models standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. (Draft). Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC: Author.
26. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium, (2003). How does this help states and districts with NCLB. Available: http://www.ccsso.org/faqs1.doc-3/13/03.
27. Jasman A.M. Addressing teachers for career progression: The level 3 classroom teacher in western Australia Unicorn: Journal of the Australian College of Education 25 2 1999 13-23
28. Kuehn, L. (1999). Responding to globalization of education in the Americas: Strategies to support public education. Paper presented at the Initiatives for Democratic Education in the Americas (IDEA) conference. Quito, Ecuador, October 1999. Available: http://www.bctf.bc.ca/social/globalization/responding.html.
29. Locke T. Curriculum, assessment and the erosion of professionalism New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 36 1 2001 5-23
30. Locke, T. (2002). Someone else's game: Constructing the English teaching professional in New Zealand. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
31. Louden W. Standards for Standards: The development of Australian professional standards for teaching Australian Journal of Education 44 2 2000 44-53
32. Marzano R.J. Kendall J.S. Implementing standards-based education 1998 National Education Association Washington, DC
33. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1989). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession. Detroit, MI: Author.
34. National Commission for Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at risk: The imperatives for educational reform. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
35. National Commission on Teaching & America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
36. National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.
37. National Council of Teachers of English. (2000): NCTE/IRA standards for the English language arts. Available: http://www.ncte.org/standards/standards.shtml.
38. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
39. National Research Council. (1995). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
40. Neave G. In De Groof J. Neave G. Svec J. (Eds.), Democracy and governance in higher education 1998 Kluwer Law International The Hague
41. Petrosky A. Delandshere G. Standards-based reform: Is this the way forward English in Australia The Journal of the Australian Association for the Teaching of English 129-130 9.1 2000 30-38
42. Popkewitz T.S. The denial of change in educational change: Systems of ideas in the construction of national policy and evaluation Educational Researcher 29 1 2000 17-29
43. Porter T.M. Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life 1995 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
44. Sanders, W. L. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Available: http://www.mdk12.org/practices/ ensure/tva/implications.html
45. Sanders W.L. Saxton A.M. Horn S.P. The Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): A quantitative, outcomes-based approach to educational assessment In Millman J. (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools 1997 Corwin Press Thousand Oaks, CA
46. Sanders W.L. Saxton A.M. Schneider J.F. Dearden B.L. Wright S.P. Horn S.P. Effects of building change on indicators of student academic growth Evaluation Perspectives 4 1 1994 3-7
47. Slaughter S. National higher education policies in a global economy In Currie J. Newson J. (Eds.), Universities and globalization: Critical perspectives 1988 Sage Publication Thousand Oaks, CA
48. Stromquist N.P. Monkman K. Globalization and education: Integration and contestation across cultures 2nd ed. 2000 Rowman and Littlefield Publishing Lanham, MD
49. Tabb, W. (2001). Globalization and education as commodity. New York, NY: Queens College and the Graduate Center. Available: http://www.psc-cuny.org/jcglobalization.htm.
50. Thematic Network Teacher Education in Europe. TNTEE, (2000). Synthesis SIGMA Pilot project-Report for 1996-1999. Available: http://tntee.umu.se/archive/sigma_pp/sigma_pr_en.html.
51. Travers R.M. How research has changed American schools 1983 Mythis Press Kalamazoo, MI
52. Tucker M.S. Codding J.B. Standards for our schools: How to set them, measure them, and reach them 1998 Jossey Bass San Francisco
53. United States Government. (March, 2002). A quality teacher in every classroom: Improving teacher quality and enhancing the profession. http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/education/teachers/ quality_teachers.html
54. Wright S.P. Horn S.P. Sanders W.L. Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11 1 1997 57-67
55. Wyatt R.L. Looper S. So you have to have a portfolio: A teachers' guide to preparation and presentation 1999 Sage\par Thousand Oaks, CA