A 10-second fluid challenge guided by transthoracic echocardiography can predict fluid responsiveness

Critical Care

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Wu, Yunfan ^a   Zhou, Shusheng ^a   Zhou, Zhihua ^b   Liu, Bao ^a  

^a ANHUI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ANHUI UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VELOCITY TIME INDEX; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; CRYSTALLOID; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPH; FEMALE; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPTIC SHOCK; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VENTILATED PATIENT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SEPSIS; SHOCK; SHOCK, SEPTIC; SHOCK, TRAUMATIC;

CRYSTALLOID; ISOTONIC SOLUTION; ORAL REHYDRATION SOLUTION;

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REHYDRATION SOLUTIONS; SEPSIS; SHOCK; SHOCK, SEPTIC; SHOCK, TRAUMATIC;

EID: 84904617333     PISSN: 13648535     EISSN: 1466609X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/cc13891     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2642-2647. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da, 19602972.
2. Levitov A, Marik PE. Echocardiographic assessment of preload responsiveness in critically ill patients. Cardiol Res Pract 2012, 2012:819696. 3171766, 21918726.
3. Cordemans C, De Laet I, Van Regenmortel N, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Huber W, Malbrain ML. Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance. Ann Intensive Care 2012, 2:S1. 10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S1, 3390304, 22873410.
4. Rivers EP, Jaehne AK, Eichhorn-Wharry L, Brown S, Amponsah D. Fluid therapy in septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010, 16:297-308. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833be8b3, 20601867.
5. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011, 39:259-265. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15, 20975548.
6. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, Prasser C, Keyl C. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005, 22:658-665. 10.1017/S0265021505001092, 16163911.
7. Machare-Delgado E, Decaro M, Marik PE. Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study. J Intensive Care Med 2011, 26:116-124. 10.1177/0885066610384192, 21595098.
8. Smith SH, Perner A. Higher vs. lower fluid volume for septic shock: clinical characteristics and outcome in unselected patients in a prospective, multicenter cohort. Crit Care 2012, 16:R76. 10.1186/cc11333, 3580618, 22568926.
9. Bayer O, Reinhart K, Kohl M, Kabisch B, Marshall J, Sakr Y, Bauer M, Hartog C, Schwarzkopf D, Riedemann N. Effects of fluid resuscitation with synthetic colloids or crystalloids alone on shock reversal, fluid balance, and patient outcomes in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective sequential analysis. Crit Care Med 2012, 40:2543-2551. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318258fee7, 22903091.
10. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010, 111:1180-1192. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b, 20736431.
11. Thiel SW, Kollef MH, Isakow W. Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg raising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: an observational cohort study. Crit Care 2009, 13:R111. 10.1186/cc7955, 2750155, 19586543.
12. Guinot PG, Zogheib E, Detave M, Moubarak M, Hubert V, Badoux L, Bernard E, Besserve P, Caus T, Dupont H. Passive leg raising can predict fluid responsiveness in patients placed on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care 2011, 15:R216. 10.1186/cc10451, 3334760, 21923944.
13. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013, 41:1774-1781. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a25fd, 23774337.
14. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol 2008, 74:123-135.
15. Shujaat A, Bajwa AA. Optimization of preload in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Res Pract 2012, 2012:761051. 3420225, 22919473.
16. Mandeville JC, Colebourn CL. Can transthoracic echocardiography be used to predict fluid responsiveness in the critically ill patient? A systematic review. Crit Care Res Pract 2012, 2012:513480. 3286892, 22400109.
17. Prekker ME, Scott NL, Hart D, Sprenkle MD, Leatherman JW. Point-of-care ultrasound to estimate central venous pressure: a comparison of three techniques. Crit Care Med 2013, 41:833-841. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827466b7, 23318493.
18. Brun C, Zieleskiewicz L, Textoris J, Muller L, Bellefleur JP, Antonini F, Tourret M, Ortega D, Vellin A, Lefrant JY, Boubli L, Bretelle F, Martin C, Leone M. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in severe preeclamptic patients with oliguria. Intens Care Med 2013, 39:593-600.
19. Choi DY, Kwak HJ, Park HY, Kim YB, Choi CH, Lee JY. Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow velocity as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in children after repair of ventricular septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol 2010, 31:1166-1170. 10.1007/s00246-010-9776-8, 20703453.
20. Dinh VA, Ko HS, Rao R, Bansal RC, Smith DD, Kim TE, Nguyen HB. Measuring cardiac index with a focused cardiac ultrasound examination in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2012, 30:1845-1851. 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.03.025, 22795411.
21. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Candela D, Zoric L, Suehs C, de La Coussaye JE, Molinari N, Lefrant JY. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 2011, 115:541-547. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a500, 21792056.
22. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb SA, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R, Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric S Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013, 41:580-637. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af, 23353941, Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric S.
23. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007, 13:549-553. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282ec68b2, 17762234.
24. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge?. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011, 17:290-295. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834699cd, 21508838.
25. Cecconi M, Monti G, Hamilton MA, Puntis M, Dawson D, Tuccillo ML, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2012, 78:527-533.
26. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:1333-1337. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000214677.76535.A5, 16557164.
27. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, La Torre G, Mannocci A, De Waure C, Bello G, Maviglia R, Antonelli M. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010, 36:1475-1483. 10.1007/s00134-010-1929-y, 20502865.
28. Preau S, Dewavrin F, Soland V, Bortolotti P, Colling D, Chagnon JL, Durocher A, Saulnier F. Hemodynamic changes during a deep inspiration maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Cardiol Res Pract 2012, 2012:191807. 3238357, 22195286.
29. Lukito V, Djer MM, Pudjiadi AH, Munasir Z. The role of passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012, 13:e155-160. 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182388ab3, 22198809.
30. Teboul JL, Monnet X. Prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity. Curr Opin Crit Care 2008, 14:334-339. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282fd6e1e, 18467896.
31. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N, Lorne E, Hijazi M, Zogheib E, Tinturier F, Slama M, Dupont H. The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010, 38:1824-1829. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eb3c21, 20639753.
32. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:659-663. 10.1007/s00134-008-0994-y, 18214429.
33. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Hocker J, Schottler J, Steinfath M, Bein B. Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients. J Crit Care 2012, 27:325. e327-313.
34. Skulec R, Cermak O, Skalicka H, Kolar J. Variability of aortic blood flow predicts fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing healthy volunteers. Kardiol Pol 2009, 67:265-271.
35. Feissel M, Teboul JL, Merlani P, Badie J, Faller JP, Bendjelid K. Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients. Intens Care Med 2007, 33:993-999.
36. McIlroy DR, Kharasch ED. Acute intravascular volume expansion with rapidly administered crystalloid or colloid in the setting of moderate hypovolemia. Anesth Analg 2003, 96:1572-1577.
37. Verheij J, van Lingen A, Beishuizen A, Christiaans HM, de Jong JR, Girbes AR, Wisselink W, Rauwerda JA, Huybregts MA, Groeneveld AB. Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery. Intensive Care Med 2006, 32:1030-1038. 10.1007/s00134-006-0195-5, 16791665.
38. Perel P, Roberts I, Ker K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 2:CD000567.
39. Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL, Arnout ML, Susic D, Frohlich E, Andrejak M. Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: a new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002, 283:H1729-1733.