Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients

Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 325.e7-325.e13

  Broch, Ole ^a   Renner, Jochen ^a   Gruenewald, Matthias ^a   Meybohm, Patrick ^a   Höcker, Jan ^a   Schöttler, Jan ^a   Steinfath, Markus ^a   Bein, Berthold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fluid responsiveness; Global end diastolic volume index; Monitoring; Preload; Pulse pressure variation; Stroke volume variation; Velocity time integral

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; LEG MOVEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PROGNOSIS; PULSE PRESSURE; REFERENCE VALUE; SURGICAL PATIENT; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

EID: 84859800640     PISSN: 08839441     EISSN: 15578615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.07.073     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Pinsky M.R., Brophy P., Padilla J., et al. Fluid and volume monitoring. Int J Artif Organs 2008, 31:111-126.
2. Rhodes A., Cecconi M., Hamilton M., et al. Goal-directed therapy in high-risk surgical patients: a 15-year follow-up study. Intensive Care Med 2010, 36:1327-1332.
3. Osman D., Ridel C., Ray P., et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007, 35:64-68.
4. De Backer D., Taccone F.S., Holsten R., et al. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009, 110:1092-1097.
5. Rex S., Schalte G., Schroth S., et al. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51:1258-1267.
6. De Backer D., Heenen S., Piagnerelli M., et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31:517-523.
7. Hadian M., Severyn D.A., Pinsky M.R. The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients. J Crit Care 2011, 26:328.
8. Renner J., Gruenewald M., Quaden R., et al. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:650-658.
9. Hofer C.K., Muller S.M., Furrer L., et al. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005, 128:848-854.
10. Renner J., Meybohm P., Gruenewald M., et al. Global end-diastolic volume during different loading conditions in a pediatric animal model. Anesth Analg 2007, 105:1243-1249.
11. Michard F., Alaya S., Zarka V., et al. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 2003, 124:1900-1908.
12. de Waal E.E., Rex S., Kruitwagen C.L., et al. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:510-515.
13. Durand P., Chevret L., Essouri S., et al. Respiratory variations in aortic blood flow predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated children. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:888-894.
14. Slama M., Masson H., Teboul J.L., et al. Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: a new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002, 283:H1729-H1733.
15. Feissel M., Michard F., Mangin I., et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001, 119:867-873.
16. Michard F., Chemla D., Richard C., et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 159:935-939.
17. Rex S., Brose S., Metzelder S., et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004, 93:782-788.
18. Sakka S.G., Ruhl C.C., Pfeiffer U.J., et al. Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2000, 26:180-187.
19. Slama M., Masson H., Teboul J.L., et al. Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:1182-1187.
20. Kumar A., Anel R., Bunnell E., et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004, 32:691-699.
21. Marik P.E., Cavallazzi R., Vasu T., et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2642-2647.
22. Heenen S., De Backer D., Vincent J.L. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?. Crit Care 2006, 10:R102.
23. Hofer C.K., Ganter M.T., Rist A., et al. The accuracy of preload assessment by different transesophageal echocardiographic techniques in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008, 22:236-242.
24. Reuter D.A., Goepfert M.S., Goresch T., et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions. Br J Anaesth 2005, 94:318-323.
25. Renner J., Gruenewald M., Brand P., et al. Global end-diastolic volume as a variable of fluid responsiveness during acute changing loading conditions. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007, 21:650-654.
26. Lamia B., Ochagavia A., Monnet X., et al. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:1125-1132.
27. Belloni L., Pisano A., Natale A., et al. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echocardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008, 22:243-248.
28. Snygg J., Bech-Hanssen O., Lonn L., et al. Fluid therapy in acute myocardial infarction: evaluation of predictors of volume responsiveness. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009, 53:26-33.
29. Pauca A.L., Wallenhaupt S.L., Kon N.D., et al. Does radial artery pressure accurately reflect aortic pressure?. Chest 1992, 102:1193-1198.
30. Lamia B., Teboul J.L., Monnet X., et al. Contribution of arterial stiffness and stroke volume to peripheral pulse pressure in ICU patients: an arterial tonometry study. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:1931-1937.
31. Monnet X., Chemla D., Osman D., et al. Measuring aortic diameter improves accuracy of esophageal Doppler in assessing fluid responsiveness. Crit Care Med 2007, 35:477-482.
32. Monnet X., Rienzo M., Osman D., et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:1402-1407.