Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: A prospective cohort study

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 116-124

  Machare Delgado, Enrique ^a   Decaro, Matthew ^b   Marik, Paul E ^a,c  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

critical care; doppler echocardiography; fluid responsiveness; hemodynamics; inferior vena cava; pulse contour

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ASCITES; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; HEART ARREST; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART PERFORMANCE; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODIALYSIS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; M MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MALE; MONITOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS; RESUSCITATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEPSIS; SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; STROKE VOLUME VARIATION; TIDAL VOLUME; VIGILEO;

AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; STROKE VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR;

EID: 79953903084     PISSN: 08850666     EISSN: 15251489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885066610384192     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2000;4(5):282-289.
2. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(2):419-28; quiz 449-445.
3. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121(6):2000-2008. (Pubitemid 34634425)
4. Axler O, Tousignant C, Thompson CR, et al. Small hemodynamic effect of typical rapid volume infusions in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(6):965-970. (Pubitemid 27264240)
5. Durairaj L, Schmidt GA. Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis: less is more. Chest. 2008;133(1):252-263.
6. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1333-1337.
7. Parker M. Goals for fluid resuscitation: a real challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:295-296. (Pubitemid 46035712)
8. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238(5):641-648. (Pubitemid 38182252)
9. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(21):2213-2224. (Pubitemid 43788136)
10. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(24):2564-2575. (Pubitemid 43882352)
11. Upadya A, Tilluckdharry L, Muralidharan V, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA. Fluid balance and weaning outcomes. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(12):1643- 1647. (Pubitemid 41677239)
12. Epstein CD, Peerless JR. Weaning readiness and fluid balance in older critically ill surgical patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(1):54-64. (Pubitemid 43498191)
13. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, et al. Sepsis in european intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(2):344-353. (Pubitemid 43145611)
14. Rosenberg AL, Dechert RE, Park PK, Bartlett RH, NIH NHLBI ARDS Network. Review of a large clinical series: Association of cumulative fluid balance on outcome in acute lung injury: a retrospective review of the ARDSnet tidal volume study cohort. J Intensive Care Med. 2009;24(1):35-46.
15. Magder S. Central venous pressure monitoring. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12(3):219-227. (Pubitemid 44365950)
16. Magder S, Bafaqeeh F. The clinical role of central venous pressure measurements. J Intensive Care Med. 2007;22(1):44-51. (Pubitemid 46052733)
17. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):691-699. (Pubitemid 38340065)
18. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172-178.
19. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(1):64-68. (Pubitemid 46035678)
20. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74(4):123-135. (Pubitemid 351597303)
21. Marik PE, Baram M. Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23(3):383-400. (Pubitemid 47446136)
22. Breukers RM, Sepehrkhouy S, Spiegelenberg SR, Groeneveld AB. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21(5):632-635. (Pubitemid 47464948)
23. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, Genoni M, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99(3):329-336. (Pubitemid 47316385)
24. Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, Joseph P, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24(10):832-839. (Pubitemid 350194901)
25. Chatti R, de Rudniki S, Marque S, et al. Comparison of two versions of the vigileo-FloTrac system (1.03 and 1.07) for stroke volume estimation: A multicentre, blinded comparison with oesophageal doppler measurements. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(4):463-469.
26. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21(2):132-138. (Pubitemid 38176155)
27. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest. 2005;128(2):848-854. (Pubitemid 41140517)
28. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Hirani A, Vasu T. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):2642-2647.
29. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, Ruyer O, Faller JP, Teboul JL. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest. 2001;119(3):867-873. (Pubitemid 32197661)
30. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(1):134-138. (Pubitemid 30469810)
31. Stephan F, Novara A, Tournier B, et al. Determination of total effective vascular compliance in patients with sepsis syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(1):50-56. (Pubitemid 28071261)
32. Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(10):2810-2816.
33. Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Ultrasonographic examination of the venae cavae. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(2):203-206. (Pubitemid 43251139)
34. Beaulieu Y. Bedside echocardiography in the assessment of the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5 suppl):S235-S249. (Pubitemid 46642638)
35. Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12(3):249-254. (Pubitemid 44365954)
36. Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(9):1740-1746. (Pubitemid 39297177)
37. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(9):1834-1837. (Pubitemid 39297190)
38. Beaulieu Y, Marik PE. Bedside ultrasonography in the ICU: part 1. Chest. 2005;128(2):881-895. (Pubitemid 41140522)
39. Beaulieu Y, Marik PE. Bedside ultrasonography in the ICU: part 2. Chest. 2005;128(3):1766-1781. (Pubitemid 41324475)
40. Beaulieu Y. Specific skill set and goals of focused echocardiography for critical care clinicians. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5 suppl):S144-S149. (Pubitemid 46646769)
41. Manecke GR Jr, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: Clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21(1):3-7. (Pubitemid 46199245)
42. Mayer J, Boldt J, Schollhorn T, Rohm KD, Mengistu AM, Suttner S. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98(2):176-182. (Pubitemid 47071996)
43. Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(2):344-349. (Pubitemid 46221243)
44. Ostergaard M, Nielsen J, Nygaard E. Pulse contour cardiac output: an evaluation of the FloTrac method. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(6):484-489.
45. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: A comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99(3):337-342. (Pubitemid 47316386)
46. Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, Foer A, Muller M, von Heymann C. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R164.
47. Prasser C, Bele S, Keyl C, et al. Evaluation of a new arterial pressure-based cardiac output device requiring no external calibration. BMC Anesthesiol. 2007;7(1):9.
48. Chakravarthy M, Rajeev S, Jawali V. Cardiac index value measurement by invasive, semi-invasive and non invasive techniques: a prospective study in postoperative off pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009;23(3):175-180.
49. de Waal EE, Kalkman CJ, Rex S, Buhre WF. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(8):1904-1909. (Pubitemid 47220365)
50. Zimmermann A, Kufner C, Hofbauer S, et al. The accuracy of the Vigileo/FloTrac continuous cardiac output monitor. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22(3):388-393.
51. Mayer J, Boldt J, Wolf MW, Lang J, Suttner S. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(3):867-872, table of contents.
52. Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(4):451-456. (Pubitemid 351773603)
53. Senn A, Button D, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/Vigileo algorithm in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R32.
54. Critchley LA. Self-calibrating pulse contour cardiac output: do validation studies really show its clinical reliability? Crit Care. 2009;13(2):123.
55. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: Pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(5):1480-1486, table of contents.
56. Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A, et al. Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(1):47-54.
57. Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21(5):636-643. (Pubitemid 47464954)
58. Hadian M, Pinsky MR. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13(3):318-323. (Pubitemid 46789349)
59. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, Revel P, Sztark F. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(6):761-768.
60. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(2):513-517.
61. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care. 2008;12(3):R82.