Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: Rebound versus goldmann applanation tonometry

Current Eye Research

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 902-907

  Fuest, Matthias ^a   Mamas, Nikolaos ^a   Walter, Peter ^a   Plange, Niklas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cataract surgery; Corneal edema; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Icare; Intraocular pressure; Rebound tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EDEMA; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REBOUND TONOMETER; TONOMETRY; VERY ELDERLY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEAL EDEMA; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; DEVICES; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORNEAL EDEMA; CORNEAL PACHYMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84904606759     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: 14602202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2014.888451     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38: 1-30.
2. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. 3rd ed. Savona, Italy: European Glaucoma Society; 2008:61-66.
3. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurementcomparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2006;15:2-6.
4. Punjabi OS, Kniestedt C, Stamper RL, Lin SC. Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and use. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;34:837-840.
5. Kontiola AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:142-145.
6. Schreiber W, Vorwerk CK, Langenbucher A, Behrens-Baumann W, Viestenz A. A comparison of rebound tonometry (ICare) with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologe 2007;104:299-304.
7. Rehnman JB, Martin L. Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008;28:382-386.
8. Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, Fujioka M, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, et al. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142: 332-334.
9. Munkwitz S, Elkarmouty A, Hoffmann EM, Pfeiffer N, Thieme H. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246: 875-879.
10. Salim S Fau-Du H, Du H Fau-Wan J, Wan J. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2013; 22:325-329.
11. Yamashita T, Miki A, Ieki Y, Kiryu J, Yaoeda K, Shirakashi M. Central and peripheral intraocular pressure measured by a rebound tonometer. Clin Ophthalmol 2011; 5:1113-1118.
12. Dahlmann-Noor AH, Puertas R, Tabasa-Lim S, El-Karmouty A, Kadhim M, Wride NK, et al. Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study. BMJ Open 2013;3:e001788.
13. Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J, Craig J. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2008;17:43-47.
14. Lau W, Pye D. Changes in corneal biomechanics and applanation tonometry with induced corneal swelling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:3207-3214.
15. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 1957;134:221-242.
16. Moses RA. The Goldmann applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol 1958;46:865-869.
17. Stelzer R. Relationship of the corneal applanations to intraocular pressure in enucleated human eyes (author's transl). Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1973;189:33-41.
18. Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Hali A, Lin C, Kam P, Ngyuen T. The effect of contact lens induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements. J Glaucoma 2007;16:153-158.
19. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pursten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:471-476.
20. Simon G, Small RH, Ren Q, Parel JM. Effect of corneal hydration on Goldmann applanation tonometry and corneal topography. Refract Corneal Surg 1993;9: 110-117.
21. Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307-310.
22. Bland M. How can I decide the sample size for a study of agreement between two methods of measurement?. Available from: http://www-users.york.ac. uk/-mb55/meas/sizemeth.htm [last accessed 12 Jan 2004].
23. Gaton DD, Ehrenberg M, Lusky M, Wussuki-Lior O, Dotan G, Weinberger D, et al. Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements. Curr Eye Res 2010;35:475-479.
24. Sudesh S, Moseley MJ, Thompson JR. Accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1993;71:185-188.
25. Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:892-899.
26. Kwon RO, Price MO, Price Jr FW,, Ambrosio Jr R, Belin MW. Pentacam characterization of corneas with Fuchs dystrophy treated with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Refract Surg 2010;26: 972-979.
27. Suzuki H, Takahashi H, Hori J, Hiraoka M, Igarashi T, Shiwa T. Phacoemulsification associated corneal damage evaluated by corneal volume. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142: 525-528.
28. Park SH, Choi SK, Lee D, Jun EJ, Kim JH. Corneal thickness measurement using Orbscan, Pentacam, Galilei, and ultrasound in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. Cornea 2012;31:978-982.
29. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156-162.
30. Jorge JM, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Queiros A, Fernandes P, Parafita MA. Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the ocular response analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry. J Glaucoma 2008;17: 442-448.
31. Luce D, Taylor D. Reichert ocular response analyzer measures corneal biomechanical properties and IOP. Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments. Depew, NY: Reichert Inc.; 2006.
32. Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology 2008; 115:80-84.
33. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Brusini P. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:642-650.
34. Rosentreter A, Athanasopoulos A, Schild AM, Lappas A, Cursiefen C, Dietlein TS. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas. Cornea 2013;32:313-318.
35. Neuburger M, Maier P, Bohringer D, Reinhard T, Jordan FJ. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model. J Glaucoma 2013;22:584-590.